AN EXTREMELY RARE AND IMPORTANT PAIR OF HUANGHUALI HORSESHOE-BACK ARMCHAIRS, QUANYI
Prospective purchasers are advised that several co… 顯示更多 Uniquely Styled and Elegantly Crafted: A Pair of Huanghuali Round-Back Chairs The round-back chair emerged simultaneously with other high-back chairs during the late Tang and Song dynasties. The form may well have been developed through a fusion of two more ancient forms—the platform dais and the curved armrest (pinji) with three short legs, the latter which was also placed upon platforms as an accessory backrest (cf. fig. 1). Early evidence from Song period paintings reveals large ponderous chairs with a comb-like arrangement of vertical posts supporting a curved armrest with scrolling ends; such form appears in a detail from Breaking the Balustrade (fig. 2) where upon a Han emperor is seated. Others also depict more ethereal forms with slender cabriole legs and delicately balanced armrests; such is the drawing of an abbots chair as well as the elegant seat depicted in the portrait of the Zen master Dao Yuan (figs. 3-4). By the late Ming and Qing dynasties, streamlined hardwood versions had developed into one of the most graceful forms of traditional Chinese furniture. Notwithstanding, stylistic innovations continued to be experimented with, and archaistic expressions drawn from early forms were also revisited. Such are the uniquely styled and exquisitely crafted pair of round-back armchairs offered in this sale. Decorative art with archaistic characteristics was often favored by the literati class. Wen Zhenheng, a late Ming arbiter of taste, repeatedly cites a preference for furniture styled according to the old patterns from the Song and Yuan dynasties. Several archaistic features may be seen in the chairs offered by Christies. Firstly, the armrests terminate with large scroll-shaped handgrips, a characteristic that is even more pronounced in early illustrations. Secondly is the wide back splat (fig. 5), which is constructed as a tri-sectional panel as illustrated in the Song drawing above. Finally, the acute angle of the “goose-neck” front armrest posts, which is fitted with bracket-like spandrels above and below (fig. 6), recalls those ethereal forms depicted in Song and Yuan paintings. Elegant design aside, the exquisite craftsmanship typical of the Jiangnan region is also apparent in the details of these chairs. The armrest is shaped with three pieces joined with half-lap joints utilizing blind tenons; the use of unique pressure pegs, which are intelligently set at an angle to impart compression, fixes the joint tightly together (fig. 7); this technique, which has been noted on several other chairs from the region, may also indicate the signature of a common workshop. Delicate beading, which is traced around the back-splat medallion, aprons and spandrels, also reflects the refinement typical to the southern furniture-making tradition. A unique feature of these chairs is the removable seat panel. Soft seats of woven cane required periodic replacement; presumably, independent seat panels would have facilitated such necessity. It is more common that beds were made with removable frames; even today it is still possible to happen upon an itinerant craftsman reweaving such a bed frame along the street side in some parts of China. A notable group of early-style huanghuali southern officials chairs with thick headrest reinforced with spandrels, high armrests, and straight side posts also share the feature of removable seat panels (cf. fig. 8); these chairs, which are also typically found throughout the Jiangnan and Weiyang regions, may bear some relationship to the round-back chairs. Nevertheless, chair construction with removable seat panels was not a widely adopted practice. The present chairs were originally likely part of larger set of eight or more identical chairs that became separated over time. Four from the Robert Hatfield Ellsworth collection were published in 1970, and in 2015, were sold by Christies for a record-breaking price (fig. 9); another pair was published by Giuseppe Eskenazi in the late 90’s; the pair in this sale bring the group to eight. Known sets of hardwood chairs rarely exceed four; those of eight are very rare. Notwithstanding, inscriptions discovered by this author on several lacquered chairs indicates that sets of twelve, twenty to thirty were not uncommon; thus, opportunities to reunite such chair sets still exist. Finally, the round back chair with cubic base is also a three-dimensional representation of the cosmological concept ‘round heaven and square earth’ (tianyuan difang). An ancient Chinese proverb also advises “external roundness and inner squareness” (waiyuan neifang)—square inside indicating guidance through noble principles; and round outside referring to the ability to exercise relative adaptability. These seats, which rest upon a solidly grounded base, and above, exhibit a welcoming supple openness, certainly reflect such divine balance. Curtis Evarts Independent Academic Consultant Former Curator of the Museum of Classical Chinese Furniture, California. Blue Oaks Farm, California Fall, 2017 Figure 1 Detail from Shi Xianzu, anonymous, album leaf painting, attributed Song dynasty, National Palace Museum, Taipei. Figure 2 Detail from Breaking the Balustrade, anonymous, hanging scroll, Song dynasty, National Palace Museum, Taipei. Figure 3 Abbots chair, wood cut from Wushan shicha tu, Song dynasty. Figure 4 Portrait of Daoyuan, anonymous, hanging scroll, Song dynasty, Japanese collection. Figure 5 Detail of huanghuali round-back armchair, armrest and backrest. Figure 6 Detail of huanghuali round-back armchair, gooseneck support. Figure 7 Detail of huanghuali round-back armchair, half-lap pressure-peg join. Figure 8 Huanghuali southern official’s chair with removable seat panel, after Weiyang Mingshi jiaju, private collection, Hong Kong. Figure 9 Set of huanghuali four round-back armchairs, former Robert Hatfield Ellsworth collection.
明十七世紀 黃花梨圈椅一對來源: 西方私人珍藏; 購自嘉木堂文獻: 伍嘉恩著《明式家具二十年經眼錄》, 北京, 2010年, 第100至101頁唐宋之際,靠背圈椅與其它高背椅應運而生。這些椅子的樣式融合了兩種前朝風格的家具——木製平臺以及帶三條短腿足之弧形扶手。扶手亦能放在平臺上,用作裝飾性的靠背(圖1) 。在存世的宋畫中,可見早期梳形造型的座椅,其扶手兩端以弧形回轉,收尾成扁圓鈕形。該類樣式可參考臺北國立故宮博物院藏宋代《折檻圖》中,西漢成帝的座椅(圖2)。另外其它宋畫亦有描繪腿足較幼細、椅圈更纖巧的扶手椅; 如附圖木刻版畫中所見的圈椅以及一幅道元禪師像中的座椅(圖3及圖4)。晚明及清朝時期,承襲此設計的硬木家具逐漸成為傳統中國家具中的一種經典樣式。中式家具兼具創新風格與復古元素,在回溯傳統中依舊不斷創新前行,而此對清雅高致,巧奪天工的黃花梨靠背圈椅拍品,便是最佳印證。雋永復古的工藝品自古以來便為文人士大夫所鍾愛。晚明名士文徵明,曾多次在文章中提到自己猶愛仿宋元風格的家具。佳士得這次呈獻的一對圈椅便蘊含各種仿古元素。其一,扶手兩末端均以扁圓鈕形收尾,此乃早期畫作中更常見的樣式。其二,圈椅的靠背板較一般寬(圖5),以三段攢框裝板造成,如上述宋畫中所呈現的座椅般。其三,扶手尾端下的鵝勃彎度很大,上下飾有一雙角牙 ,令人聯想起宋元畫作中所見的家具樣式(圖6)。除了高雅脫俗的設計外,江南工藝的匠心獨運,亦可從圈椅其它細節中管窺一二。其扶手三接,兩端出頭回轉收尾成扁圓鈕形;椅腿帶有向內傾斜的挺拔角度令座椅極為穩固,再運用榫卯結構,使座椅穩當且不易變形(圖7)。該工藝技巧在同地區製作的其他座椅上亦有應用到,或許表明它們製成自同一工作坊。玲瓏的雕刻線條環繞背靠板及牙子,充分彰顯獨具匠心的南方家具制作傳統。此拍品獨特之處是其可裝可卸的活屜座面。由柔軟藤條編織而成的座椅需要定期更換,而獨立的座面設計則方便更換。此造法在架子床中更為常見,直至今天,在中國一些街頭,依然能看到流動的工匠在路旁編織新的床面用作更換舊的床面。另外一組聞名遐邇的黃花梨南官帽椅,同樣安有可裝可卸的活動座面 (圖8);這類常在江南和渭陽地區見到的南官帽椅,與圈椅可能有不少關聯。總括而言,此類可隨意裝卸的活屜座面並不是一種廣泛使用的設計,實屬罕見。佳士得這次拍賣的兩把圈椅極有可能源自一組八件甚至更多的組合,然而隨著時間的推移,這些圈椅四散各地。其中,羅伯特·哈特菲爾德·埃爾斯沃思(Robert Hatfield Ellsworth)收藏的四把圈椅於1970年出版過,在2015年在佳士得以破紀錄的價格出售(圖9);另一組則由朱塞佩·埃斯肯納齊(Giuseppe Eskenazi)在90年代後期出版;加之這對將要在倫敦拍賣的圈椅,使我們推斷這組椅子的數量起碼有八把。眾所周知的硬木座椅組合,極少超過四把;八把同組的椅子則極為罕見。儘管如此,在筆者研究過的漆椅銘文中,表明十二、二十到三十件組合的座椅並不少見;因此,藏家將更多件同類椅子組合在一起的機會依然存在。「天圓地方」是傳統中國的陰陽學說,這兩把圈椅上圓下方,猶如張開的雙臂,虛懷若谷。中國成語中的「外圓內方」,指的是內部應以高尚的原則指導思想;而外部應有圓通豁達的適應能力。這對圈椅的曲線造型柔中帶剛,不僅能傳達坐者的威儀與端莊,同時又能予人一種安定平和及舒泰悠然的感覺。柯惕思 客席學術顧問 美國加州中國古典家具博物館前館長2017年秋寫於加州

MING DYNASTY, 17TH CENTURY

細節
明十七世紀 黃花梨圈椅一對

來源: 西方私人珍藏; 購自嘉木堂
文獻: 伍嘉恩著《明式家具二十年經眼錄》, 北京, 2010年, 第100至101頁

唐宋之際,靠背圈椅與其它高背椅應運而生。這些椅子的樣式融合了兩種前朝風格的家具——木製平臺以及帶三條短腿足之弧形扶手。扶手亦能放在平臺上,用作裝飾性的靠背(圖1) 。在存世的宋畫中,可見早期梳形造型的座椅,其扶手兩端以弧形回轉,收尾成扁圓鈕形。該類樣式可參考臺北國立故宮博物院藏宋代《折檻圖》中,西漢成帝的座椅(圖2)。另外其它宋畫亦有描繪腿足較幼細、椅圈更纖巧的扶手椅; 如附圖木刻版畫中所見的圈椅以及一幅道元禪師像中的座椅(圖3及圖4)。晚明及清朝時期,承襲此設計的硬木家具逐漸成為傳統中國家具中的一種經典樣式。中式家具兼具創新風格與復古元素,在回溯傳統中依舊不斷創新前行,而此對清雅高致,巧奪天工的黃花梨靠背圈椅拍品,便是最佳印證。

雋永復古的工藝品自古以來便為文人士大夫所鍾愛。晚明名士文徵明,曾多次在文章中提到自己猶愛仿宋元風格的家具。佳士得這次呈獻的一對圈椅便蘊含各種仿古元素。其一,扶手兩末端均以扁圓鈕形收尾,此乃早期畫作中更常見的樣式。其二,圈椅的靠背板較一般寬(圖5),以三段攢框裝板造成,如上述宋畫中所呈現的座椅般。其三,扶手尾端下的鵝勃彎度很大,上下飾有一雙角牙 ,令人聯想起宋元畫作中所見的家具樣式(圖6)。

除了高雅脫俗的設計外,江南工藝的匠心獨運,亦可從圈椅其它細節中管窺一二。其扶手三接,兩端出頭回轉收尾成扁圓鈕形;椅腿帶有向內傾斜的挺拔角度令座椅極為穩固,再運用榫卯結構,使座椅穩當且不易變形(圖7)。該工藝技巧在同地區製作的其他座椅上亦有應用到,或許表明它們製成自同一工作坊。玲瓏的雕刻線條環繞背靠板及牙子,充分彰顯獨具匠心的南方家具制作傳統。

此拍品獨特之處是其可裝可卸的活屜座面。由柔軟藤條編織而成的座椅需要定期更換,而獨立的座面設計則方便更換。此造法在架子床中更為常見,直至今天,在中國一些街頭,依然能看到流動的工匠在路旁編織新的床面用作更換舊的床面。另外一組聞名遐邇的黃花梨南官帽椅,同樣安有可裝可卸的活動座面 (圖8);這類常在江南和渭陽地區見到的南官帽椅,與圈椅可能有不少關聯。總括而言,此類可隨意裝卸的活屜座面並不是一種廣泛使用的設計,實屬罕見。

佳士得這次拍賣的兩把圈椅極有可能源自一組八件甚至更多的組合,然而隨著時間的推移,這些圈椅四散各地。其中,羅伯特·哈特菲爾德·埃爾斯沃思(Robert Hatfield Ellsworth)收藏的四把圈椅於1970年出版過,在2015年在佳士得以破紀錄的價格出售(圖9);另一組則由朱塞佩·埃斯肯納齊(Giuseppe Eskenazi)在90年代後期出版;加之這對將要在倫敦拍賣的圈椅,使我們推斷這組椅子的數量起碼有八把。眾所周知的硬木座椅組合,極少超過四把;八把同組的椅子則極為罕見。儘管如此,在筆者研究過的漆椅銘文中,表明十二、二十到三十件組合的座椅並不少見;因此,藏家將更多件同類椅子組合在一起的機會依然存在。

「天圓地方」是傳統中國的陰陽學說,這兩把圈椅上圓下方,猶如張開的雙臂,虛懷若谷。中國成語中的「外圓內方」,指的是內部應以高尚的原則指導思想;而外部應有圓通豁達的適應能力。這對圈椅的曲線造型柔中帶剛,不僅能傳達坐者的威儀與端莊,同時又能予人一種安定平和及舒泰悠然的感覺。

柯惕思

客席學術顧問
美國加州中國古典家具博物館前館長

2017年秋寫於加州

Each 26 ¾ in. (68 cm.) wide, 21 in. (53.3 cm.) deep, 36 in. (91.5 cm.) high
來源
With Grace Wu Bruce.
Property from a Distinguished Private Collection.
出版
Grace Wu Bruce, On the Kang and Between the Walls, London, 1998, no.3, p16.
Grace Wu Bruce, Two Decades of Ming Furniture, Beijing, 2010, pp. 100-101.
注意事項
Prospective purchasers are advised that several countries prohibit the importation of property containing materials from endangered species, including but not limited to coral, ivory and tortoiseshell. Accordingly, prospective purchasers should familiarize themselves with relevant customs regulations prior to bidding if they intend to import this lot into another country. This lot will be removed to Christie’s Park Royal. Christie’s will inform you if the lot has been sent offsite. Our removal and storage of the lot is subject to the terms and conditions of storage which can be found at Christies.com/storage and our fees for storage are set out in the table below - these will apply whether the lot remains with Christie’s or is removed elsewhere. Please call Christie’s Client Service 24 hours in advance to book a collection time at Christie’s Park Royal. All collections from Christie’s Park Royal will be by pre-booked appointment only. Tel: +44 (0)20 7839 9060 Email: cscollectionsuk@christies.com. If the lot remains at Christie’s it will be available for collection on any working day 9.00 am to 5.00 pm. Lots are not available for collection at weekends.

榮譽呈獻

Leila de vos van Steenwijk
Leila de vos van Steenwijk

拍品專文

The present pair is among eight known and published chairs of this design. Of the eight extant examples, a set of four, formerly from the Robert H. Ellsworth Collection, were sold at Christie’s New York, 17 March 2015, lot 41 and was illustrated by Robert H. Ellsworth in Chinese Furniture: Hardwood Examples of the Ming and Early Ch'ing Dynasties, New York, 1971, pl. 15 (fig. 10) and another pair was sold at Sotheby's New York, 18-19 April 1989, lot 508, and is now in a private American collection. Of the eight known, all have been lacquered on the reverse of the backsplat and the seat frames are fitted with drop in mat seats.
 
This pair of chairs displays the unparalleled grace and finesse seen only in the finest furniture dated to the Ming dynasty. Several features distinguish this magnificent pair: the elegant curve of the crest rail, the exceptionally well-carved sweeping hook handles, the three-part backsplat with finely carved openwork panel, and the beautifully figured huanghuali panels. The chairs were constructed by a master craftsman, as evidenced by the confident carving of the well-molded hook handles, which are made rarer by the flattened, rounded ends. The unusual tri-part backsplat can also be seen on a single huanghuali side chair illustrated by G. Wu Bruce in Two Decades of Ming Furniture, Beijing, 2010, p. 136, suggesting that the set of eight horseshoe-back armchairs and the side chair were constructed in the same workshop. See, also, a Wanli-period woodblock print from the Story of the Red Pear, Hong Li Ji,  which depicts two scholars seated in tall ‘official’s hat’ armchairs with similar three-part backsplat (fig. 11).
 
The sweeping crestrail is constructed in three sections, which is rarer than the more commonly found five-section crestrail. Three-section crestrails demand larger sections of timber to achieve the dramatic curves of the arms and would have resulted in a significant amount of wastage, thus indicating the enormous financial resources of the gentleman who commissioned the set. For a detailed description and explanation of the sophisticated joinery utilized by the Chinese craftsmen to construct the curved rails of the elegant and graceful horseshoe-back armchair, see Curtis Evarts, "Continuous Horseshoe Arms And Half-Lapped Pressure Peg Joins," Journal of The Classical Chinese Furniture Society, Spring, 1991, pp. 14-18.

The Chinese name for this type of chair, quanyi, is literally translated as 'chair with a circular back' or 'circle chair'. During the Song dynasty (960-1279) this form was known as kaolaoyang, which refers to a large round basket made from split bamboo. The English name for this form, however, refers to the overall shape of the back and arm rests, which resembles a horseshoe. Wang Shixiang and Curtis Evarts have suggested that the horseshoe-back armchair emerged simultaneously with other examples of high-back chairs during the Tang (618-907) and Song (960-1279) dynasties. See, Wang Shixiang and Curtis Evarts, op. cit., p. 56, for a further discussion of the form.

Figure 10 One of a set of four huanghuali horseshoe-back armchairs from the Robert H. Ellsworth Collection as published by Robert Ellsworth. Courtesy of Hei Hung Lu.

Figure 11 Woodblock print from Story of the Red Pear (Hong Li Ji), Ming dynasty.

更多來自 中國瓷器及工藝精品

查看全部
查看全部