Lot Essay
"The underground map is recognisable although it is an abstraction that seems representative of place; people who are not interested in art might like it, because it is comfortable. And I like using something that allows the viewer to enter into the work. So, initially, people are comfortable with the work. It is almost like figurative art - people forget that it is a construction, an illusion, and they feel quite comfortable with it. The original design of the Underground Map is a complete abstraction - it's just a graphic solution to a problem. But people relate to it and accept it. Then you can undermine the work as an object, give it a new use. It has a new rationale. I didn't alter it arbitrarily. It has my own logic but it is a completely personal, idiosyncratic one.R ("Names are words for things", Sculpture, Jan. 1997, vol. 16, no. 1).