Theodoor van Thulden (1606-1669)

Details
Theodoor van Thulden (1606-1669)

An Allegory of Trade leaving Antwerp with the Patroness of the City at the left, Mercury in the centre, and the Rivergod De Schelde to the right

oil on paper, brown ink framing lines
290 x 255 mm.
Provenance
Private collection, Eindhoven
with Theunissen Donders, Nijmegen, 1952
Literature
J.R. Martin, The decorations for the Pompa Introitus Ferdinandi, Corpus Rubenianum, XVI, Brussels, 1972, p. 184-5, under no. 47 (as reversed copy)
Exhibited
Arnhem, 1958, no. 34 (as A. van Diepenbeeck)
Laren, 1963, no. 96 (as Rubens School)
Nijmegen, 1965, no. 43 (as Rubens School)
Leeuwarden, 1966, no. 8 (as Rubens School)
Bonn/Saarbrücken/Bochum, 1968/9, no. 114 (as Rubens School)
Rheydt, 1971, no. 64 (as Rubens School)
Amsterdam, 1975/6, no. 122
Bremen/Braunschweig/Stuttgart, 1979/80, no. 136
Fribourg/Passau/Trier/Aachen/Nuremberg, 1982/4, no. 100
Engraved
in reverse, by the artist (Holl. 133, Martin 47)
in reverse, part of a larger print, by the artist for Pompa Introitus Honori Serenissimi Ferdinandi Austriaci Hispaniarum Infantis ..., Antwerp, 1642 (Holl. 132, Martin 46), an impression is sold with the lot

Lot Essay

After the death of Governess Isabella in 1633 the Southern Netherlands were again reigned by Spain. Don Ferdinand, brother of Philip IV was appointed new Governor and entered Antwerp on 17 April 1635. For this occasion Rubens was asked to deliver decorations, and with others Theodor van Thulden was commissioned to execute these after Rubens' designs. The magistrates later asked Van Thulden to make a series of prints to commemorate the decorations in a book, published in 1642.
One of the main decorations, 'Mercury departing from Antwerp', was painted by Van Thulden after Rubens' oilsketch, now in the Hermitage, St. Petersburg (Martin, op.cit., no. 461, fig. 93). The picture was destroyed in a fire in 1731, but is shown on Teniers' picture of the Gallery of the Archduke, now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna. Van Thulden engraved the subject twice, but probably due to the well-known composition, not in reverse. Martin (op.cit.) described the present lot, which is in reverse to the artist's original decoration, as a reversed copy.
In the catalogue of the Amsterdam exhibition, where the present lot was exhibited as by Van Thulden, is described that J. Richard Judson pointed out that it would seem possible that Van Thulden made a smaller oilstudy of the subject preliminary to the engraver's drawing, in reverse to the original decoration. One of the engravings (Holl. 133, Martin 47) is of the same dimensions and in reverse to the present lot, on which it could well be based

More from The Hans van Leeuwen Collection

View All
View All