Lot Essay
Gerbrand van den Eeckhout is best known as a painter of religious and historical subjects, the areas in which his style comes closest to that of Rembrandt, of whom he seems to have been a great friend as well as one of the most talented pupils. An artist of great versatility, he also painted genre pictures, landscapes and portraits, executed etchings and designs for gold and silverwork and occasionally wrote poetry. Peter Sutton, following Valentiner, has noted the significance of van den Eeckhout's genre paintings in the development of the simplified form of genre scene, with only a few figures and in an upright format, first seen in the years around 1650 and so popular in Dutch art in the following decades. The present picture, which would seem to be van den Eeckhout's earliest dated genre painting, probably antedates the first genre paintings of the new type by Pieter de Hooch, such as his 'Tric-Trac Players' in the National Gallery, Dublin (Sutton, op. cit., 1980, p.77, no.12, colour pl.II and pl.11). The development is demonstrated in the work of Gerard ter Borch, from his early horizontal genre scenes such as the 'Tric-Trac Players' of c.1640 formerly in the Bremen Kunsthalle (Gudlaugsson, op. cit., I, 1959, illustrated p.187), reminiscent of Willem Duyster's work in the early 1630s, to mature works such as the 'Unwelcome News' of 1653 in the Mauritshuis.
The present picture has regularly been incorrectly described in the recent literature. The errors all seem to stem from Valentiner, who,
while giving the date correctly as 1651 on his p.XXIV (although on p.288 in the notes to the plates, the caption for the present picture is exchanged for that of a Maes illustrated on the same page), describes the support as panel. The present painting must be the work included in the Raleigh exhibition in 1956 (part of a Raleigh loan label remains on the stretcher), but it was described in the catalogue written by Valentiner as dated 1655, on panel and measuring 13½ x 11½in. Sumowski, while illustrating what is undoubtedly the present picture, follows the description given in the Raleigh catalogue (although with the date as 1653) and is forced to suggest that there were two versions of identical composition but different size and support. Roy inexplicably gives the date as 1657
The present picture has regularly been incorrectly described in the recent literature. The errors all seem to stem from Valentiner, who,
while giving the date correctly as 1651 on his p.XXIV (although on p.288 in the notes to the plates, the caption for the present picture is exchanged for that of a Maes illustrated on the same page), describes the support as panel. The present painting must be the work included in the Raleigh exhibition in 1956 (part of a Raleigh loan label remains on the stretcher), but it was described in the catalogue written by Valentiner as dated 1655, on panel and measuring 13½ x 11½in. Sumowski, while illustrating what is undoubtedly the present picture, follows the description given in the Raleigh catalogue (although with the date as 1653) and is forced to suggest that there were two versions of identical composition but different size and support. Roy inexplicably gives the date as 1657