Workshop of Quinten Metsys (Leuven 1466-1530 Kiel nr. Anterp)
VAT rate of 5% is payable on hammer price plus bu… Read more FROM THE COLLECTION OF THE LATE MR ALFRED HAUSAMMANN, ZURICH (Lots 96-114)
Workshop of Quinten Metsys (Leuven 1466-1530 Kiel nr. Anterp)

The Virgin and Child in a landscape

Details
Workshop of Quinten Metsys (Leuven 1466-1530 Kiel nr. Anterp)
The Virgin and Child in a landscape
oil on panel
18¾ x 12¾ in. (47.6 x 32.4 cm.)
Literature
M.J. Friedländer, 'Über den Zwang der iconographischen Tradition in der vlämischen Kunst', ibid., pp. 21-2, as Quentin Metsys.
E. Panofsky, Early Netherlandish Painting, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1953, I, p. 353.
Count A. Seilern, Flemish Paintings & Drawings at 56 Princes Gate, London, SW7, I, London, 1955, pp. 5-6, under no. 3.
M.J. Friedländer, Early Netherlandish Painting, VII, London, 1971, pp. 63 and 80, supplement no. 166, fig. 32, as Quentin Metsys.
A. de Basque, Quentin Metsys, Brussels, 1975, p. 114, fig. 107, as Quentin Metsys.
L. Silver, Quinten Massys, Oxford, 1984, p. 207, under no. 13.
Exhibited
Schaffhausen, Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausen, Meisterwerke Flämischer Malerei, 1955, no. 58.
Special notice
VAT rate of 5% is payable on hammer price plus buyer's premium.

Lot Essay

This is one of a group of three paintings by Metsys and his studio, the other two both depicting the Madonna standing in a Church with Angels, of which the first (the Seilern Madonna) is in the Princes Gate Collection, Courtauld Institute Galleries, London, and the second is in the Musée des Beaux-Arts, Lyons. Well documented by Metsys scholars, the question of priority amongst the three works would appear currently to stand with the Seilern picture regarded as the prototype, that in Lyons as a subsequent, autograph replica and the present picture as a studio variant, as judged by Silver (op. cit., p. 207).

Friedländer, however, formerly regarded the present picture as the prime version, first publishing it as such in 1938 (loc. cit.). Panofsky questioned that assessment, however, regarding the present picture as 'apparently executed by an assistant', a judgement followed by Count Anton Seilern, who in his 1955 catalogue of his collection wrote: 'Judging from the photograph, this composition seems to be a later, free version of the present one [his own picture].' Friedländer returned to the question in the English edition of his Early Netherlandish Painting, regarding the Lyons painting as the prime, the Seilern painting as 'a precise replica apparently by the master's hand' and the present work as a 'free repetition ....likewise by the master's hand' (op. cit., 1971, p. 63). De Basque followed Friedländer, regarding the present work as being by the same hand as the Seilern painting, which he accepted as autograph. Although, of course, the possibility cannot be discounted that the picture may yet be reaffirmed as fully autograph, the present cataloguing follows Silver's assessment.

As noted by Silver (loc. cit.), most scholars have dated the composition to early in Metsys' career; he, however, compared the 'bright blue gown' of the Seilern Virgin to the 'colourful garments' of those in the Lamentation from the Saint John altarpiece (Antwerp, Musée Royale des Beaux-Arts) and the Rest on the Flight (Worcester, Massachusetts, Art Museum) from the Seven Sorrows Altarpiece. Similarly, he compared the 'high forehead, tiny chin, and firm, straight nose' of the Antwerp and Worcester Virgins to the Seilern Virgin, dating the latter work thereby to Metsys' early maturity. The Lyons painting he dated slightly later, by comparison with the Crucifixion in the National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa.

More from Important Old Master Pictures

View All
View All