Lot Essay
The inscription, ce ce, is possibly later added.
The noted Chinese scholar Chen Mengjia examined this ding along with the other three bronzes from the Doris Duke Collection in this sale, (lots 145, 148 and 150) while he was in the United States from 1944 to 1947. Like the others, it was included in his comprehensive survey of 845 Chinese ritual bronzes in Amercian Collections later published in 1962 by The Academia Sinica, Beijing, under the title, Mei diguo zhuyi jielue di woguo Yin Zhou tongqi tulu as no. A79.
This ding is almost identical to one in the Shanghai Museum, illustrated by Chen Peifen, Ancient Chinese Bronzes in the Shanghai Museum, London, 1995, p. 60, no. 33, and also in Rites et festins de la Chine antique: Bronzes du musée de Shanghai, Musée Cernuschi, Paris, 1998, pp. 108-9, no. 22.
The noted Chinese scholar Chen Mengjia examined this ding along with the other three bronzes from the Doris Duke Collection in this sale, (lots 145, 148 and 150) while he was in the United States from 1944 to 1947. Like the others, it was included in his comprehensive survey of 845 Chinese ritual bronzes in Amercian Collections later published in 1962 by The Academia Sinica, Beijing, under the title, Mei diguo zhuyi jielue di woguo Yin Zhou tongqi tulu as no. A79.
This ding is almost identical to one in the Shanghai Museum, illustrated by Chen Peifen, Ancient Chinese Bronzes in the Shanghai Museum, London, 1995, p. 60, no. 33, and also in Rites et festins de la Chine antique: Bronzes du musée de Shanghai, Musée Cernuschi, Paris, 1998, pp. 108-9, no. 22.