Lot Essay
In his 1976 discussion on the present painting Archer notes the similarity of various features of the composition to those of Guler painting. Is it by chance that the two figures are very similarly arranged and the spatial composition similarly empty to that of the same subject painted by Manaku, the brother of Nainsukh of Guler (W.G. Archer: Indian Paintings from the Punjab Hills, London, 1973, Basohli no.19(vi), vol.2, p.34). B.N. Goswamy suggests that Manaku's series was influential in the work of his brother (Nainsukh of Guler, Zurich, 1997, pp.33-4). Archer in the end however concludes that it is from Kangra on the basis of the colouration of the figures and the decoration of the spandrels. This would be fully consistent with the influence having arrived through Manaku's son Fattu who was known to have moved to Kangra (see lot 49), rather than by his brother. A series of paintings with very similar spandrels form a Sat Sai series attributed to Kangra 1780-90 (B.N. Goswamy and Eberhart Fischer: Pahari Masters, Zurich, 1992, no.150, p.350). One of these in the National Museum New Delhi is signed by Fatttu.