ARTURO LUZ (b. The Philippines 1926)
The primary preoccupation of Arturo Luz is to explore all variations and possibilities of lines. In the works of Luz, the quality of drawing is the single most important quality in rendering the works with visually novel and challenging compositions of linear forms. "Fernando Zobel once said 'Bright colours cancel each other out.' If you use colours in excess, the effect is drab. The colours kill each other instead of enhancing each other. But just look at a Zobel painting. It's almost nothing but black and white tomes, and suddenly this little strip of brilliant explodes. The painting is beautiful, because colours has been used with restraint and skill." (Cid Reyes, Arturo Luz, Ayala Foundation and the Crucible, Manila, 1999, p. 16). "I cannot paint flowers. They are by nature too decorative and pretty. I like things that are very stark, elemental, simple, like a stone, a shell." (Ibid., p. 26). The renunciation of colours would be another characteristic of the work of Luz which he explained in many occasions, "I admire artists for loving colours. But I couldn't possibly go that way. It is not in my nature to be gaudy. A colourful painting is something I can admire. But is also something I will never do." (Ibid., p.50). Lineal aesthetics, architectural chic and a monochromatic tendency, these words describes the work of Arturo Luz but no one expounds the principle of painting better than the artist himself, "Everything I do I invent. I invent my material, I invent my own anatomy. I am after the gesture of the figure, the bone, the structure, and not the surface." (Ibid., p. 67).
ARTURO LUZ (b. The Philippines 1926)

Estudiantina (Travelling musician)

Details
ARTURO LUZ (b. The Philippines 1926)
Estudiantina (Travelling musician)
enamel on canvas
45 5/8 x 32 1/8 in. (116 x 81.5 cm.)
Provenance
Alfredo J. Luz, Manila.
Thence by descent to the present owner.
The artist has kindly confirmed the provenance of the present lot.

Lot Essay

"The constructional tendency easily identifies itself with the immediate post war pioneers of the modern art movement in the Philippines. Vicente Manansala and Arturo Luz fit in this category. Both artists, in their individual idiom, are pushing this direction to a point of refinement where the perceiving sensibility operates in instant oneness with the essence-reducing tectonic activity. Thus, Luz makes a procedural statement such as 'I start with a definite figure in a particular stance. Then I geometricise. But I do not impose geometry on the figure. The ordering springs from the figure. I reduce it to its essenceand I do this almost mathematically.' " (Cid Reyes, Arturo Luz, Ayala Foundation and the Crucible, Manila, 1999, p. 37.).

The words of Dr. Rod Paras-Perez and the quotation he used from the artist aptly sums up the essence of the work of Luz. It is strange that for a composition that is approached with such a clinical and mathematical manner could be richly evocative of a poetic elegance that tickles ones imagination.

Painted in 1957 Estudiantina is one of the earliest attempts of the artist's foray into the musician subject which he continued to develop over the years, in fact, one which he continues to explore today. Painted after the artist's one year stay in Madrid in 1954, the title of the work referred to a band of young students who the artist chanced in the street of Madrid. In this aspect, the present work is a fine prototype which offers a glimpse at the origin of the celebrated musician series. It is therefore significant to see the 'first musician' in a fuller form then its later version. Eventually the torso of the subject would be completely geometricised to mere triangle and his arms and legs would be unabashedly lineal. Nevertheless, this first prototype contains the quintessential elements of the Luz, which the inter-play of lines and geometric forms creates a balance and harmony that is as elegant as it is poetic.

More from Modern and Contemporary Southeast Asian Art

View All
View All