Lot Essay
An identical vase in the Beijing Palace Museum collection is illustrated in Qing Dai Yu Yao Ciqi, I, Forbidden City Publishing House, Beijing, 2005, p.24-25 (fig.1).
A second vase, in the W. W. Winkworth Collection, was sold at Sotheby's London, 12 December 1972, lot 99, and again at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 31 October 1974, lot 198, now in the Au Bak Ling collection.
The most unusual shape of this vase appears to owe a considerable amount to a bronze original, probably a holy water flask. The styling of this vase is particularly unusual with the non-functional double ribs around the neck and cup-shaped rim. The most likely explanation for this stylistic detail is that it revives what would have been a metal flange, to assist a user to hold it when pouring water from the bottle. Holy water bottles are recorded in porcelain from the Yongle period onwards; a fragmentary flask, described as a holy water jar and measuring 27 cm. high, was excavated from the Yongle-period strata at Zhushan, cf. Ceramic Finds from Jingdezhen, Fung Ping Shan Museum, Hong Kong, 1992, Catalogue, fig. 201. The shape continued through the Ming dynasty, with rare blue and white examples recorded from the Xuande and Wanli periods; a turquoise-ground Fahua vase of similar shape is illustrated by R. L. Hobson, The Wares of the Ming Dynasty, 1923, front cover.
The form seems to have been revived during the Yongzheng period, probably as part of a fashion in archaism, which drew on ceramics and bronzes readily available in Beijing as design models for potters responding to the taste for antiques at the Imperial court. Compare a Yongzheng-marked vase of closely related shape, with a crackled glaze imitating guanyao, illustrated by J. Ayers in the Baur Collection, Catalogue, vol. III, no. A348, which the author suggests may be based on a Song or Ming bronze original. Compare also to a flambé-glazed vase of this form, illustrated in Kangxi, Yongzheng, Qianlong, Hong Kong, 1989, p. 257, pl. 86.
The expert rendition of the painting is of particular note on this vase. The finely pencilled swirling waves are executed in a blue of much lighter tone than the saturated cobalt-blue dragons and provides an attractive contrast which places the dragons in prominence on an otherwise busy ground.
A second vase, in the W. W. Winkworth Collection, was sold at Sotheby's London, 12 December 1972, lot 99, and again at Sotheby's Hong Kong, 31 October 1974, lot 198, now in the Au Bak Ling collection.
The most unusual shape of this vase appears to owe a considerable amount to a bronze original, probably a holy water flask. The styling of this vase is particularly unusual with the non-functional double ribs around the neck and cup-shaped rim. The most likely explanation for this stylistic detail is that it revives what would have been a metal flange, to assist a user to hold it when pouring water from the bottle. Holy water bottles are recorded in porcelain from the Yongle period onwards; a fragmentary flask, described as a holy water jar and measuring 27 cm. high, was excavated from the Yongle-period strata at Zhushan, cf. Ceramic Finds from Jingdezhen, Fung Ping Shan Museum, Hong Kong, 1992, Catalogue, fig. 201. The shape continued through the Ming dynasty, with rare blue and white examples recorded from the Xuande and Wanli periods; a turquoise-ground Fahua vase of similar shape is illustrated by R. L. Hobson, The Wares of the Ming Dynasty, 1923, front cover.
The form seems to have been revived during the Yongzheng period, probably as part of a fashion in archaism, which drew on ceramics and bronzes readily available in Beijing as design models for potters responding to the taste for antiques at the Imperial court. Compare a Yongzheng-marked vase of closely related shape, with a crackled glaze imitating guanyao, illustrated by J. Ayers in the Baur Collection, Catalogue, vol. III, no. A348, which the author suggests may be based on a Song or Ming bronze original. Compare also to a flambé-glazed vase of this form, illustrated in Kangxi, Yongzheng, Qianlong, Hong Kong, 1989, p. 257, pl. 86.
The expert rendition of the painting is of particular note on this vase. The finely pencilled swirling waves are executed in a blue of much lighter tone than the saturated cobalt-blue dragons and provides an attractive contrast which places the dragons in prominence on an otherwise busy ground.