Daniel Buren (B. 1938)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more
Daniel Buren (B. 1938)

Peinture aux Formes Variables

Daniel Buren (B. 1938)
Peinture aux Formes Variables
inscribed and dated ‘215 x 180 cm MAI 66’ (on the overlap)
paint on cotton cloth woven with red and white stripes, alternating and vertical 8.7 cm wide each
81 1/4 x 70 7/8 in. (206.5 x 180 cm.)
Painted in May 1966. This work is accompanied by a certificate of authenticity, known as ‘Avertissement,’ which will be delivered by the artist in the name of the new buyer.
Collection of the artist, Paris
Galerie Kamel Mennour, Paris
Acquired from the above by the present owner
U. Allemandi, Daniel Buren: Photos-Souvenirs 1965-1988, Villeurbanne, 1988, no. 3 (illustrated in color).
A. Boisnard and D. Buren, Daniel Buren 1964/1966: Catalogue raisonné chronologique Tome II, Paris, 2000, T II-293 (illustrated in color).
L. Wolf, "Daniel Buren ou le malentendu," Le Temps: Le Samedi Culturel, Geneva, 25 January 2000, p. 1 (illustrated).
Villeurbanne, Le Nouveau Musée, Comme Lieu–Situation I, November 1985-February 1986.
Paris and Abu Dhabi, Galerie Kamel Mennour, Daniel Buren & Alberto Giacometti: Oeuvres Contemporaines 1964-1966, April-November 2010, pp. 41, 77-78 and 80 (illustrated in color).
Paris, Kraemer Gallery, Kraemer Gallery / Kamel Mennour, October 2015.
Special notice

On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee. Where Christie's has provided a Minimum Price Guarantee it is at risk of making a loss, which can be significant, if the lot fails to sell. Christie's therefore sometimes chooses to share that risk with a third party. In such cases the third party agrees prior to the auction to place an irrevocable written bid on the lot. The third party is therefore committed to bidding on the lot and, even if there are no other bids, buying the lot at the level of the written bid unless there are any higher bids. In doing so, the third party takes on all or part of the risk of the lot not being sold. If the lot is not sold, the third party may incur a loss. The third party will be remunerated in exchange for accepting this risk based on a fixed fee if the third party is the successful bidder or on the final hammer price in the event that the third party is not the successful bidder. The third party may also bid for the lot above the written bid. Where it does so, and is the successful bidder, the fixed fee for taking on the guarantee risk may be netted against the final purchase price.

Third party guarantors are required by us to disclose to anyone they are advising their financial interest in any lots they are guaranteeing. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, if you are advised by or bidding through an agent on a lot identified as being subject to a third party guarantee you should always ask your agent to confirm whether or not he or she has a financial interest in relation to the lot.

Brought to you by

Saara Pritchard
Saara Pritchard

Lot Essay

Peinture aux Formes Variables from May 1966 is one of Daniel Buren’s earliest and most significant paintings, made when the artist first began experimenting with the stripes that would establish him as one the most important artists of the postwar period. Here, the red-and-white striped fabric functions as a canvas for Buren to paint on.

In this painting, Buren applied white paint to the red and white striped fabric in curved lines—the “variable forms” of the works title—that interfere with the straightness of printed pattern. White paint frames areas of print, but unlike a traditional painting where a frame would lead to a scene, the striped fabric interrupts any illusion. As art historian Anne Rorimer has noted, “Buren’s work is rooted in the artist’s initial search for ways to strip painting of illusionistic and expressive reference as per his decision in 1965 to reduce the pictorial content of his canvases to the repetition of mechanically printed, alternating white and colored vertical bands 8.7 cm in width painted white on its outer stripes” (A. Rorimer, “Daniel Buren: From Painting to Architecture,” Parkett 66, 2003, n.p.). By using commercial fabric, Buren was able to distance himself from the idea of artistic authorship, an idea fraught with notions of individual expression that artists of the 1960s rallied against after decades of expressionist painting before them.

For Buren, the stripes are “visual tools.” Buren considers the striped fabric he uses to be equivalent to the support—be it canvas, wood, glass or a wall upon which a fresco or mural would be painted—any painting would be painted on. However, unlike a white canvas or primed surface, the stripes he uses as his support remain visible to the viewer, calling attention to the fact that the support is not a blank or neutral surface.

By bringing the viewer’s attention to the canvas, in addition to that which is painted on it and the paint used to do so, Buren was able to reveal not only the support a painting was painted on, but also the space in which it hung, ultimately referencing the space of the gallery, museum or institution. More so, as art critic Austin Considine has pointed out, “The stripes also tend to transform whatever space they inhabit, rendering familiar public spaces unfamiliar, calling into question the values we attach to these spaces and their role as a forum for competing—and often contentious—artistic, public and state interests” (A. Considine, “Between the Lines,” Art in America, Jan. 24, 2013, http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/daniel-buren-petzel-bortolami-1/ [accessed March 2016]).

Buren first thought to use striped fabric as the support for his paintings in September of 1965. He recalls, “I was working with painting, but I was never satisfied and then one day I found in the marché Saint-Pierre a material, a striped linen, which was in a way much closer to what I wanted to do than what I was able to do with painting. I started using the material with very little paint and little by little the painting reduced to the point I realized I was very close to what I wanted, and that opened the door to something else I hadn’t thought about which was to work with the space and work outside of the art system, galleries and museums” (D. Buren quoted in S. Kolesnikov-Jessop, “Daniel Buren on His Career, Luxury Collaborations, And Why He ‘Hated’ the Venice Biennale,” Blouin ArtInfo, Sept. 3, 2015, via http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/1229428 [accessed March 2016]). In other words, the striped fabric helped Buren strip painting down to its core, what the artist called “degree zero” (D. Buren, quoted by G. Lelong, Daniel Buren, Paris, 2002, p. 37). What was left of painting in this reduced state was an awareness of the context it was placed in.

By 1967, only months after painting Peinture aux Formes Variables, Buren would stop painting on fabric and instead use the landscape of Paris’s streets as his canvas, creating site-specific installations with the stripe motif that directly engaged space and architecture. Peinture aux Formes Variables, May 1966, then is formative in establishing Buren’s trajectory towards institutional critique. For his first solo exhibition at the Apollinaire Gallery in 1968, Buren hung a large swath of striped fabric at the entry way, using the door’s frame to frame the fabric like a painting and simultaneously blocking entrance to the gallery. In 1975, at one of the artist’s first museum exhibitions, at the Municipal Museum of Mönchengladbach in Germany, Buren wallpapered the walls with striped fabric, leaving blank spaces where the museum’s collections of paintings had once hung. Interchanging the canvas that paint is applied to with the wall unto which a painting is hung, Buren asked, “Is the wall a background for the picture or is the picture a decoration for the wall? In any case, the one does not exist without the other” (D. Buren, “On Saturday,” Daniel Buren: Around “Ponctuations,” Lyon, 1980, n.p.). Though his projects would increasingly call attention to the space in which art is presented, his critique of the institution is founded in questions of painting developed in Peinture aux Formes Variables, May 1966.

More from Bound to Fail

View All
View All