Lot Content

Global notice COVID-19 Important notice
Robert Delaunay (1885-1941)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more Property from the Rothschild Art Foundation
Robert Delaunay (1885-1941)

La Tour Eiffel

Details
Robert Delaunay (1885-1941)
La Tour Eiffel
signed and dated 'R. delaunay 28' (lower right)
oil on canvas
31 7/8 x 25 5/8 in. (81.2 x 65.1 cm.)
Painted in Paris, 1928
Provenance
Pomaret collection, Aix-en-Provence (by 1957).
Galerie Daniel Varenne, Geneva.
Anon. sale, Palais Gallièra, Paris, 31 March 1976, lot 45.
Anon. sale, Sotheby Parke Bernet & Co., London, 6 December 1978, lot 276.
Private collection, Paris.
Sigrid Freundorfer Fine Art, New York (acquired from the above, 1998).
Stanford Z. Rothschild, Jr., Baltimore (acquired from the above, 16 June 1998).
Gift from the above to the present owner.
Literature
P. Francastel and G. Habasque, Robert Delaunay: Du cubisme à l'art abstrait, Paris, 1957, p. 292, no. 262.
Exhibited
Marseille, Musée Cantini, Premières étapes de la peinture moderne, March-May 1955, p. 28, no. 44.
Osaka, Umeda Modern Museum of Art and Gunma, Museum of Modern Art, La Tour Eiffel: un message de 100 ans: architecture, mode, peinture, September-November 1989, p. 195, no. 3 (illustrated).
Baltimore, The Walters Art Museum, Origins of the Russian Avant-Garde, February-March 2003.
Special Notice

On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee.

Where Christie's has provided a Minimum Price Guarantee it is at risk of making a loss, which can be significant, if the lot fails to sell. Christie's therefore sometimes chooses to share that risk with a third party. In such cases the third party agrees prior to the auction to place an irrevocable written bid on the lot. The third party is therefore committed to bidding on the lot and, even if there are no other bids, buying the lot at the level of the written bid unless there are any higher bids. In doing so, the third party takes on all or part of the risk of the lot not being sold. If the lot is not sold, the third party may incur a loss. In most cases, Christie’s compensates the third party in exchange for accepting this risk with remuneration based on a fixed fee if the third party is the successful bidder or, if the third party is not the successful bidder, either a fixed fee or an amount calculated against the lot’s hammer price. The third party may also bid for the lot above the written bid. Where the third party is the successful bidder, Christie’s will report the final purchase price net of the fixed financing fee for taking on the guarantee risk.

Third party guarantors are required by us to disclose to anyone they are advising their financial interest in any lots they are guaranteeing. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, if you are advised by or bidding through an agent on a lot identified as being subject to a third party guarantee you should always ask your agent to confirm whether or not he or she has a financial interest in relation to the lot. This is a lot where Christie’s holds a direct financial guarantee interest that is backed by a third party’s irrevocable bid.
Sale Room Notice
Please note that Jean-Louis Delaunay and Richard Riss have confirmed the authenticity of this work.

Brought to you by

Max Carter
Max Carter Head of Department

Lot Essay

Jean-Louis Delaunay and Richard Riss have confirmed the authenticity of this work.

In his Premier Cahier, a compilation of writings dating from 1939-1940, Robert Delaunay called the Eiffel Tower “my barometer,” in the sense that this Paris landmark, an enduring symbol of pioneering modernity, had served him throughout his career as the subject in which he traced the evolution of his art (A.A. Cohen, ed., The New Art of Color: The Writings of Robert and Sonia Delaunay, New York, 1978, p. 23). The Tower was the motif that had guided Delaunay to the cutting edge of Cubism on the eve of the First World War, and it remained at the center of his pictorial world during the inter-war period. In preparation for the decorations that Delaunay had been commissioned to provide for the 1937 Paris Exposition Universelle, his final works, the artist painted Air, Fer, Eau, in which he placed the Three Graces of antiquity beneath the Eiffel Tower. The many pavilions of the Exposition likewise lay within the shadow of the great Tower.
The present bird’s-eye view of the Eiffel Tower, created with the aid of an aerial photograph, is one of two vantage points that Delaunay typically employed in his treatment of this motif during the 1920s. The alternative view is that which the artist studied from the ground, looking upward along one of the legs of the structure to the very tip of the spire. Whereas there are few things that may be suitable as meaningful secondary motifs in an empty sky, the downward view, placing the Tower at the center of a horizonless composition—flat all around in perfect adherence with the modernist concept of the picture plane—inspired numerous compositional possibilities. Seen from a northerly prospect, the present view shows the Champs-de-Mars extending into the distance, with its Bassin in the upper left corner.
Gustave Eiffel constructed his ironwork tower as the entrance arch to the 1889 Paris Exposition Universelle. Georges Seurat painted the Tower upon its completion (Hauke, no. 196). This landmark appears distantly in several landscapes of Paris suburbs that the Douanier Rousseau painted during 1890-1904 (Vallier, nos. 56, 157a and b). While then the tallest man-made structure in the world, and the pride of France, it was not until Delaunay first painted the Tower in 1909 that this subject attracted the interest of the early 20th century modernist avant-garde. “During the years 1910 and 1911,” the poet Blaise Cendrars wrote in 1924, “Robert Delaunay and I were possibly the only people in Paris to speak of machines and art and to have the vaguest awarenesss of the great transformation of the modern world” (“The Eiffel Tower” in ibid., p. 171).
While recovering from a broken leg in a room at the Hôtel du Paris, Cendrars had a clear view of the Eiffel Tower. “Delaunay came almost every day to keep me company,” the poet reminisced. “He was always haunted by the Tower... I was able to be present at an unforgettable drama: the struggle of one artist with a subject so completely new that he did not know how to seize and subdue it... As soon as I was able to go out, I accompanied Delaunay to see the Tower... Delaunay wanted nothing less than to show Paris all around her with the Tower situated in her midst. We tried every vantage point, from every angle, from all sides...Delaunay wanted to interpret it plastically. He disarticulated the Tower in order to get inside its structure. He truncated it and he tilted it in order to disclose all of its three hundred dizzying meters of height. He adopted ten points of view, fifteen perspectives—one part seen from above, another from below...from the height of a bird in flight, from the depths of the earth itself” (ibid., pp. 174 and 175).
This initial Tower series of 1911-1912 was the outcome of Delaunay’s transformative journey through Cubism, during which he experienced, as he later wrote, “Visions of catastrophic insight, prejudices, neurasthenias, neurosis, sweeping the old away; cosmic shakings, desire for the great cleanup, for burying the old, the past. Light deforms everything, breaks everything; no more geometry, Europe crumbles. Breath of madness (futurism before the theory): dislocation of the successive object. Planetary waves” (ibid., p. 13).
Delaunay retained the Eiffel Tower as the recognizable focal point in the nearly abstract Fenêtres series, painted in luminous veils of color, that followed. He had begun to push beyond the boundaries of Cubism—especially its practitioners’ essential preoccupation with the perception and analysis of static objects in space—towards a new frontier, a dynamic simultaneity of contrasts in color forms, a virgin territory that the poet and critic Apollinaire called “pure painting.” In 1913 Delaunay created the formes circulaires of his Soleil series and Le premier disque—widely regarded as the first abstract, non-representational painting—radical, revolutionary works in which, as the artist declared, “Painting becomes painting” (ibid., p. 36).
When Delaunay revived the Tower theme a decade later, following the end of the Great War, he reinstated his defining motif as a more coherently intact architectural representation, in keeping with the classicizing “return to order” of the 1920s. In reasserting the Eiffel Tower as a symbol of modernity, however, amid all the fascination his colleagues were then according to a distant ideal of a classical past, Delaunay was seeking to remind them of the key lessons they had once taken from pre-war innovations in form and color. The Tower once again takes up the entire height of the canvas, in an absolute synergy of the motif and its environment. In counterpoint to the modern city grid, the artist transformed the Tower and the surrounding gardens of the Champs-de-Mars into a kaleidoscopic effusion of curving and semi-spherical forms, including the legs and spire of the Tower itself, to create an abstract quilt of color zones. As if he had fired the sun’s rays through a prism, and commandeered the component hues for his colors, Delaunay rendered this vision of the Tower in the most heated chromatic contrasts that his oil paints were capable of producing.
In 1925 Jean Hans Arp and El Lissitzky requested that Delaunay contribute to their book Die Kunstismen, a compilation of the “isms” that were guiding the art of the day, with a statement from a leading exponent and illustrations of the artist’s work. Each entry was published in German, French, and English. Responding as the artist representing “Simultaneism”, his byword for more than a decade, Delaunay wrote: “Simultaneousness of color, simultaneous contrasts and every uneven proportion that results from color, as they are expressed in their representative movement: this is the only reality with which to construct a picture” (ibid., p. 75).

More from Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale Including Property from The Collection of Nancy Lee and Perry R. Bass

View All
View All