Joan Miró (1893-1983)
signed and dated ‘Joan Miró. 5.6.33.’ (on the reverse)
oil on canvas
51 ¼ x 38 ¼ in. (130 x 96.8 cm.)
Painted in Barcelona on 5 June 1933
André Lefèvre, Paris; Estate sale, Palais Galliéra, Paris, 25 November 1965, lot 63.
Perls Galleries, New York (acquired at the above sale).
Mr. and Mrs. Alexander Calder, Roxbury, Connecticut (acquired from the above, 1966 and transferred to the Estate of Alexander Calder in 1976).
Galerie Maeght, Paris and New York (acquired from the above, 1979).
Placido Arango, Madrid (by 1985); sale, Sotheby's, New York, 11 November 1999, lot 134.
Acquired at the above sale by the present owner.
J. Dupin, Joan Miró, Life and Work, New York, 1962, p. 527, no. 340 (illustrated; with incorrect dimensions).
M. Rowell, Miró, New York, 1968, no. 42 (illustrated; with incorrect dimensions).
A. Cirici Pellicer, Miró en su obra, Barcelona, 1970, p. 81, no. 21 (illustrated; with incorrect dimensions).
J.J. Sweeney, Joan Miró, Barcelona, 1970 (illustrated in color, pl. 68; illustrated in situ at the Barcelona exhibition of 1968-1969, pl. 5; with incorrect dimensions).
M. Tapié, Joan Miró, Milan, 1970, no. 42 (illustrated; with incorrect dimensions).
A. Cirici Pellicer, Miró-Mirall, Barcelona, 1977, p. 43, no. 28 (illustrated in color; with incorrect dimensions).
P. Gimferrer, The Roots of Miró, Barcelona, 1993, p. 191, no. 591 (illustrated, fig. 338 ; with incorrect dimensions).
J. Dupin and A. Lelong-Mainaud, Joan Miró: Catalogue raisonné, Paintings, 1931-1941, Paris, 2000, vol. II, p. 82, no. 429 (illustrated in color; with incorrect dimensions).
A. de la Beaumelle, Joan Miró 1917-1934, exh. cat., Musée national d'art moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, 2004 (illustrated in situ at the Pierre Matisse Gallery Exhibtion in 1933-1934, p. 361).
Paris, Galerie Georges Bernheim, Dernières oeuvres de Joan Miró, October-November 1933.
New York, Pierre Matisse Gallery, Joan Miró: Paintings, December 1933-January 1934, no. 10 (titled Composition).
Paris, Musée national d'Art Moderne, Collection André Lefèvre, March-April 1964, no. 199 (titled Composition).
New York, Perls Galleries, Twenty-One Major Acquisitions, March-April 1966, no. 13 (illustrated; titled Composition).
Tokyo, National Museum of Modern Art and Kyoto, National Museum of Modern Art, Joan Miró, August-November 1966, p. 53, no. 40 (illustrated in color; with incorrect dimensions).
Saint-Paul-de-Vence, Fondation Maeght, Miró, July-September 1968, p. 74, no. 26 (illustrated; with incorrect dimensions).
Barcelona, Recinto del Antiguo Hospital de la Santa Cruz, Miró, November 1968-January 1969, p. 60, no. 29 (illustrated, p. 100; with incorrect dimensions).
Paris, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Joan Miró, May-October 1974, p. 120, no. 43 (illustrated upside-down; with incorrect dimensions).
Charleroi, Palais des Beaux-Arts, Picasso-Miró-Dalí: Evocations d'Espagne, September-November 1985, p. 189, no. 17 (illustrated in color).
Kunsthaus Zürich and Städtische Kunsthalle Düsseldorf, Joan Miró, November 1986-April 1987, no. 81 (illustrated in color; with incorrect dimensions).
New York, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Joan Miró: A Retrospective, May-August 1987, p. 139, no. 65 (illustrated in color, p. 138; with incorrect dimensions).
Buffalo, New York, Albright-Knox Art Gallery (on extended loan, March 2017-January 2018).
Durham, North Carolina, Nasher Museum of Art, Duke University (on extended loan, 2019).
Special notice
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee. Where Christie's has provided a Minimum Price Guarantee it is at risk of making a loss, which can be significant, if the lot fails to sell. Christie's therefore sometimes chooses to share that risk with a third party. In such cases the third party agrees prior to the auction to place an irrevocable written bid on the lot. The third party is therefore committed to bidding on the lot and, even if there are no other bids, buying the lot at the level of the written bid unless there are any higher bids. In doing so, the third party takes on all or part of the risk of the lot not being sold. If the lot is not sold, the third party may incur a loss. The third party will be remunerated in exchange for accepting this risk based on a fixed fee if the third party is the successful bidder or on the final hammer price in the event that the third party is not the successful bidder. The third party may also bid for the lot above the written bid. Where it does so, and is the successful bidder, the fixed fee for taking on the guarantee risk may be netted against the final purchase price.

Third party guarantors are required by us to disclose to anyone they are advising their financial interest in any lots they are guaranteeing. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, if you are advised by or bidding through an agent on a lot identified as being subject to a third party guarantee you should always ask your agent to confirm whether or not he or she has a financial interest in relation to the lot.

Brought to you by

Ana Maria Celis
Ana Maria Celis

Lot Essay

Between March and June of 1933, Joan Miró created an extraordinary series of eighteen majestic paintings that are universally considered to be amongst the most accomplished of his career. Executed on 5 June 1933, Peinture is an important work from this much-celebrated group, one of only four of the eighteen in an imposing vertical format. Enigmatic biomorphic shapes float atop lushly modulated backgrounds of subdued, yet still radiant, color. Miró based these canvases, some of the largest he had created up to that point, on a parallel sequence of collages depicting mechanical instruments and tools. Jacques Lassaigne praised these fascinating and complex collage-based paintings:
"This group of pictures represents one of the peak points of his oeuvre; they are charged with a concentrated power, a plastic dynamism, that, surely, has never been surpassed. Without the least recourse to any anecdotal allusion that might distract our attention, the signs and figures they contain achieve a breath-taking expressiveness and fully justify the unusual procedure that went to their making" (op. cit., p. 71).
Miró painted the present work in a studio he had set up the previous year in his mother's apartment in the Passatge del Crèdit in Barcelona. The financial obligations of supporting a new wife and child in the economically precarious years of the early 1930s had forced him to leave Paris and return to his original family home, where he had been born almost four decades earlier. Having undergone a creative crisis in the late 1920s, when he questioned his own artistic ability and then famously set out to "assassinate painting," this move to Barcelona allowed him to concentrate on his work in relative peace and isolation, away from the distractions of the French capital and the political infighting that had come to plague André Breton's Surrealist circle.
It was Miró's deep sense of connection to his native Catalonian roots that both inspired and pervaded so much of his imagery, including Peinture and the other oils in this monumental series. Indeed the artist suggested to his poet friend J.V. Foix, who was due to write an essay on his recent work, that it be brought "as near as you can to the Catalan landscape in its bright and vigorous aspects, or the national aspect of music or folklore and to the admirable people from Catalonia," adding that, "this recent period of mine has been done exclusively in Catalonia, as you know" (J. Miró, letter to J.V. Foix, 19 July 1933, in A. Umland, ed., Joan Miró: Painting and Anti-Painting, 1927-1937, exh. cat., New York, 2008, p. 121). James Johnson Sweeney, then curator of The Museum of Modern Art, New York, recognized this facet of the new paintings, observing how their color palette of olives, browns and blues related to Catalonia's early church murals, their simplified forms evoked the region's folk art, and their compositions echoed the severe rhythms of the artist's native landscape (see J.J. Sweeney, "La jeune peinture de Joan Miró" in Cahiers d'Art, 1934, vol. 9, nos. 1-4, p. 49).
To create Peinture and the other seventeen paintings in this remarkable series, Miró first clipped images—largely depicting machines and utilitarian objects—from local Catalan newspapers and sales catalogues. These were then used as materials for the eighteen preparatory collages that he proceeded to pin to the walls of his small studio. These collages, in turn, became the "models" for the paintings. He later explained this novel creative procedure as follows:
"Little by little I turned from dependence on hallucinations to forms suggested by physical elements, but still quite apparent from realism. In 1933, for example, I used to tear newspapers into rough shapes and paste them on cardboards... After the collages were finished they served me as points of departure for paintings. I did not copy the collages. I merely let them suggest shapes to me" (quoted in M. Rowell, ed., Joan Miró: Selected Writings and Interviews, Boston, 1986, p. 209).
Due to the restricted space in his makeshift studio and the grand scale of canvases like Peinture, once a painting had been finished, it was taken off its stretcher and rolled, allowing Miró to begin work on the next painting in the series (see W. Rubin, Miró in the Collection of The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1973, p. 60). In a highly systematic and methodical fashion that was characteristic of his fastidious and exacting nature, he annotated each collage with the canvas size of the finished oil and the date the preparatory work was made; the chronology of the paintings follows exactly the order in which the original collages were executed. Miró based Peinture on a collage executed on 6 February 1933, which he bequeathed to the Fundació Joan Miró in 1976.
In moving from the collage to executing Peinture itself, Miró derived, invented, and fashioned forms from the pasted images, while also employing the collages as a guide in establishing the spatial relationships between these elements on the new, much larger picture plane. “The forms of these collages suggested other forms to him,” Christian Zervos wrote, “even as clouds often suggest fantastic images to us” (quoted in exh. cat., op. cit., 1941, p. 53). The artist worked from the collages, he recalled, “as if d’après nature” (W. Rubin, Miró in the Collection of The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1973, p. 60).
While the painting loosely preserves the configuration of the elements in the collage, the small, sharp-edged, inanimate objects of modernity have been transmuted into meticulously rendered, mysterious, hypertrophied shapes that recall the rounded biomorphic forms pioneered by the Surrealist artist Jean Arp. Miró fashioned these shapes into a series of balanced and carefully orchestrated relationships with one another. Opaque primary colors contrast with the thinner washes of blended pigment in the mystically worked background where the fine weave of the canvas has been allowed to show through. There are allusions to the primordial markings in the primitive cave paintings that so fascinated Miró, which Roland Penrose pointed out in his discussion of the paintings:
"As the political atmosphere darkened, and Miró's painting became prophetic of approaching catastrophes, he found in the great compositions of 1933 the means of enveloping the spectator in an atmosphere of primeval night. We are led into vast caves inhabited by magic animals, a twilight in which creatures of darkness float and dance, not on the ground but among the stars" (Miró, London, 1970, p. 186).
Between October and November later that year, the complete series of collage-based paintings was then exhibited at the prestigious Galerie Georges Bernheim in Paris. While the ongoing economic depression prevented the show from being a commercial success, the works were nonetheless much admired. The distinguished art critic André Warnod remarked that these paintings "denote an uncommon temperament. The hand that drew these lines, the mind who spawned these singular figures, are not any old hand and mind, and those harmonies coloured, orchestrated with a steadfastness, and authority, a delightful fantasy are those of a great painter" (ibid., p. 365).
When ten of the eighteen paintings travelled to New York for an exhibition at the Pierre Matisse Gallery that winter, Sweeney referred to their "ripe individuality and assured rhythms," seeing them as the fruit of all that had gone before; they were "easily the most mature distillation of sensibility he had yet offered" (op. cit., pp. 48-49). Miró himself was in no doubt whatsoever about the importance of these paintings, whose conception and exhibition heralded "a great success that might mark a red letter day in my career" (Miró, letter to P. Matisse, 5 November 1933, in E. Turner and O. Wick, exh. cat., op. cit., Basel, 2004, no. 27, p. 82).
The significance of Peinture and the other great canvases of 1933—and the dramatic impact they made—can be attributed to the intriguing working procedure Miró used to generate them, their originality and grand scale and, as Dupin has noted, the "spellbinding power" of their remarkably refined and balanced compositions (Miró, Barcelona, 1993, p. 178). In Peinture, Miró shows not only the extent to which he had absorbed ideas from Dada and Surrealism, but how far he had moved beyond them to create a work of unique visual poetry whose roots still remained in ancient art forms and the land of his birth. The complex web of influences and associations, and its relationships to his past work, make Peinture a signal work in the artist's oeuvre and, by extension, the whole canon of Modernism. Representing the pinnacle of an intensive and systematic exploration by Miró of two-dimensional form and space, these canvases, as well as suggesting to him a style that he would explore in the murals and tapestries that followed, were to influence future generations of artists—the present work was in fact owned by the Alexander Calder.
Ten of the eighteen paintings in this landmark series are now housed in major public collections, including The Museum of Modern Art, New York; The Philadelphia Museum of Art; the Kunstmuseum Bern; The National Gallery, Prague, and The Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.

More from ONE: A Global Sale of the 20th Century

View All
View All