A PAINTING OF A PRINCE CLIMBING TO HIS BETROTHED
A PAINTING OF A PRINCE CLIMBING TO HIS BETROTHED
A PAINTING OF A PRINCE CLIMBING TO HIS BETROTHED
2 More
PROPERTY FROM A DISTINGUISHED WEST COAST COLLECTION
A PAINTING OF A PRINCE CLIMBING TO HIS BETROTHED

INDIA, PROVINCIAL MUGHAL, SECOND HALF OF THE 18TH CENTURY

Details
A PAINTING OF A PRINCE CLIMBING TO HIS BETROTHED
INDIA, PROVINCIAL MUGHAL, SECOND HALF OF THE 18TH CENTURY
folio 13 1/8 x 8 1/2 in. (33.3 x 21.6 cm.)
image 12 1/8 x 8 1/8 in. (30.8 x 20.6 cm.)
Provenance
Sotheby's London, 24 April 2013, lot 91.
Literature
K. Kalista and C. Rochell, Classical Indian Paintings, New York, 2015, pp. 24-27, no. 7.
Exhibited
Carlton Rochell Asian Art, New York, "Classical Indian Paintings," 13-20 March 2015, no. 7.

Brought to you by

Tristan Bruck
Tristan Bruck International Specialist, Head of Sale, Asian Art

Lot Essay

Lit by a young maiden’s candle light, a handsome prince clandestinely ascends a thin, knotted rope to reach his betrothed. The prince has removed his shoes in order to wade through the palace’s moat, which reflects the full moon in its misty waters, as his horse and groomsmen keep watch in the rocky foreground. The dramatic night scene is illustriously heightened with gold, from the large onion dome, to the intricate accents seen in the interior architecture, the prince’s jama, and the bejeweled horse-shaped saddle pommel.
While this isn’t an especially common theme in Indian painting, several other examples are known. Of the Mughal examples, the present lot certainly stands out in quality. Compare the painting, for example, to a provincial Mughal album page from Lucknow at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (acc. no. M.2013.178), drafted with far less consideration to the detail of the architecture, the subtly of the water, and modeling of the figures and vestments. Also compare the present work to a more closely related provincial Mughal composition, sold at Christie’s South Kensington, 7 October 2011, lot 384, for 15,000 GBP; while the painting style can be considered more rudimentary, the close similarities between the two paintings brings into question whether the referenced lot might have been commissioned as a copy after the present work.
Other paintings of this subject were commissioned in Rajput courts as well. See, for example, a nineteenth-century example from Kotah, published by S.C. Welch in Gods, Kings, and Tigers: The Art of Kotah, London, 1997, pp. 208-9, no. 67. The subject was also popular in the Kishangarh school of painting, see for example a painting sold at Sotheby’s New York, 21-22 March 1990, lot 91.
;

More from Indian, Himalayan and Southeast Asian Works of Art

View All
View All