.jpg?w=1)
Lot Essay
The present sheet is an outstanding example of this very famous etching of a quintessentially Netherlandish building and landscape. Without much evidence at all and probably out of romantic sentiment, the windmill depicted here was long thought to be Rembrandt’s birthplace at Katwijk; he was indeed the son of a miller. In 1915, however, Frits Lugt identified the building as the ‘Little Stink Mill’ on De Passeerder bulwark outside of Amsterdam, owned by the Leathermakers Guild – the use of cod liver oil in the treatment of tanned leather explains its nickname.
The precise description of the construction, the mechanics of the mill and the details of the nearby cottage suggest that Rembrandt may have etched the plate en plein-air. The main body of the structure, cap, sails and platform are rendered with great accuracy, as are the anecdotal elements, such as the tiny figure of the miller about to climb the stairs into the mill with a sack on his back and the woman, possibly washing clothes, in front of the house. To achieve this level of precision, the artist may have used an etching needle thinner than usual. The buildings and the landscape is certainly rendered with an abundance of detail not found in his later ‘economically etched landscapes’ (M. Royalton-Kisch in: Hinterding, 2000, p. 187-88).
Yet the artist’s attention is not limited to the intricate description of the buildings . Rembrandt took great interest in the atmospheric qualities of the scenery: the wide empty flatlands to the right, put into perspective by the two tiny figures standing on the bulwark; the deep, dark shadows under the platform of the mill; and the cloudy, windswept sky indicated by the irregular striations and tonal areas, presumably created by sulphur tint being brushed directly onto the plate, causing a superficial and localised corrosion of the plate. As characteristic of early impressions, the craquelure above the cottage is very pronounced – an accidental effect of fine cracks in the etching ground - which, although hardly descriptive of any meteorological phenomenon, adds substance and ambiance to the sky.
The precise description of the construction, the mechanics of the mill and the details of the nearby cottage suggest that Rembrandt may have etched the plate en plein-air. The main body of the structure, cap, sails and platform are rendered with great accuracy, as are the anecdotal elements, such as the tiny figure of the miller about to climb the stairs into the mill with a sack on his back and the woman, possibly washing clothes, in front of the house. To achieve this level of precision, the artist may have used an etching needle thinner than usual. The buildings and the landscape is certainly rendered with an abundance of detail not found in his later ‘economically etched landscapes’ (M. Royalton-Kisch in: Hinterding, 2000, p. 187-88).
Yet the artist’s attention is not limited to the intricate description of the buildings . Rembrandt took great interest in the atmospheric qualities of the scenery: the wide empty flatlands to the right, put into perspective by the two tiny figures standing on the bulwark; the deep, dark shadows under the platform of the mill; and the cloudy, windswept sky indicated by the irregular striations and tonal areas, presumably created by sulphur tint being brushed directly onto the plate, causing a superficial and localised corrosion of the plate. As characteristic of early impressions, the craquelure above the cottage is very pronounced – an accidental effect of fine cracks in the etching ground - which, although hardly descriptive of any meteorological phenomenon, adds substance and ambiance to the sky.