GIOVANNI BATTISTA RUOPPOLO (NAPLES 1629-1693)
GIOVANNI BATTISTA RUOPPOLO (NAPLES 1629-1693)
GIOVANNI BATTISTA RUOPPOLO (NAPLES 1629-1693)
2 More
A Lifelong Pursuit: Important Italian Paintings from a Distinguished Private Collection
GIOVANNI BATTISTA RUOPPOLO (NAPLES 1629-1693)

Still life of fish with char, bass, rockfish, sea bream and shells

Details
GIOVANNI BATTISTA RUOPPOLO (NAPLES 1629-1693)
Still life of fish with char, bass, rockfish, sea bream and shells
oil on canvas
39 5⁄8 x 27 7⁄8 in. (100.6 x 70.7 cm.)
Provenance
with Alessandro Morandotti, Rome, by 1962.
Francesco Queirazza, Monte Carlo.
with Galerie Canesso, Paris, where acquired in 2006 by the present owner.
Literature
G. de Vito, 'Paolo Porpora e la nascita di un genere a Napoli', Ricerche sul'600 napoletano, Naples, 2000, pp. 8-41, fig. XVI.

Brought to you by

Taylor Alessio
Taylor Alessio Junior Specialist, Head of Part II

Lot Essay

Giovanni Battista Ruoppolo was among the leading still-life painters in seventeenth-century Naples, celebrated by Bernardo de' Dominici for his virtuosic naturalism and refined handling of light. While best known for his lavish compositions of fruit, Ruoppolo also produced a smaller but distinguished body of fish still lifes following the example of Giuseppe Recco. Giuseppe De Vito published this painting in his foundational study on the Neapolitan fish still-life tradition (G. de Vito, op. cit., pp. 30, 40, fig. XVI), situating it within Ruoppolo's mature production and noting its affinity with the artist's signed fish still life in the Museo di Capodimonte, Naples, and the Still life with fish and a crab in the Pagano collection, Naples.

The composition presents the day's catch—a silvery bass, a speckled char, a curving sea bream, and a brilliant red rockfish—suspended from iron hooks against a warm, umber ground, with opened oysters and a whelk shell completing the arrangement below. De Vito characterized Ruoppolo's approach to marine subjects as 'impressionistic' (op. cit., p. 30), noting his ability to capture the varied surface textures of scales, flesh, and shell through a refined sensitivity to reflected light. The restrained, pyramidal arrangement and the Caravaggesque naturalism of the present work distinguish it from the more decorative compositions Ruoppolo would develop in the 1680s under the influence of Abraham Brueghel, placing it securely within the artist's earlier, more austere production.

More from Old Master Paintings and Sculpture Part II

View All
View All