Lot Essay
Giovanni Battista Ruoppolo was among the leading still-life painters in seventeenth-century Naples, celebrated by Bernardo de' Dominici for his virtuosic naturalism and refined handling of light. While best known for his lavish compositions of fruit, Ruoppolo also produced a smaller but distinguished body of fish still lifes following the example of Giuseppe Recco. Giuseppe De Vito published this painting in his foundational study on the Neapolitan fish still-life tradition (G. de Vito, op. cit., pp. 30, 40, fig. XVI), situating it within Ruoppolo's mature production and noting its affinity with the artist's signed fish still life in the Museo di Capodimonte, Naples, and the Still life with fish and a crab in the Pagano collection, Naples.
The composition presents the day's catch—a silvery bass, a speckled char, a curving sea bream, and a brilliant red rockfish—suspended from iron hooks against a warm, umber ground, with opened oysters and a whelk shell completing the arrangement below. De Vito characterized Ruoppolo's approach to marine subjects as 'impressionistic' (op. cit., p. 30), noting his ability to capture the varied surface textures of scales, flesh, and shell through a refined sensitivity to reflected light. The restrained, pyramidal arrangement and the Caravaggesque naturalism of the present work distinguish it from the more decorative compositions Ruoppolo would develop in the 1680s under the influence of Abraham Brueghel, placing it securely within the artist's earlier, more austere production.
The composition presents the day's catch—a silvery bass, a speckled char, a curving sea bream, and a brilliant red rockfish—suspended from iron hooks against a warm, umber ground, with opened oysters and a whelk shell completing the arrangement below. De Vito characterized Ruoppolo's approach to marine subjects as 'impressionistic' (op. cit., p. 30), noting his ability to capture the varied surface textures of scales, flesh, and shell through a refined sensitivity to reflected light. The restrained, pyramidal arrangement and the Caravaggesque naturalism of the present work distinguish it from the more decorative compositions Ruoppolo would develop in the 1680s under the influence of Abraham Brueghel, placing it securely within the artist's earlier, more austere production.
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
