Lot Essay
Pieter Claeissens I was part of an enigmatic group of artists — including Adriaen Isenbrandt, Ambrosius Benson, Pieter Pourbus and Lancelot Blondeel — who forged a new artistic identity in Bruges. In the sixteenth century, the city underwent a period of economic downturn, in part due to political pressures following the death of Mary of Burgundy in 1482 and the protectionist policies of the guilds, which discouraged international trade. Despite these headwinds, many of the city’s elite continued to patronize the arts. Bruges’ painters fulfilled local commissions, while also producing works for the commercial art market at the 'pand' and for export, particularly to Spain. Claeissens is first recorded as an apprentice of the cleerscriver (canvas painter) Adriaen Becaert in August of 1516. In January of 1530 he was admitted as master in the Guild of Saint Luke and within a decade he was overseeing a productive workshop on the Oude Zak.
There is scant documentary evidence of Claeissens’ artistic production and since 2013 only five signed paintings have been identified, around which his oeuvre has been reconstructed. One such work also depicts Saint John on the island Patmos (fig. 1, private collection). The composition of both the present right wing and the later singular panel derive from Hans Memling’s painting of the same theme (Memlingmuseum, Bruges), with the saint seated on a rocky outcrop, an open book on his lap. His visions appear in the sky at upper left, and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse trailing a winding path into the background. Here, Claeissens distills the saint’s vision, focusing on Revelation chapters 6:1-8, and 12-13, which describe the release of the Four Horsemen, and the apparition of the woman ‘clothed with the sun, with the moon at her feet’, and the red dragon with seven heads.
Claeissens’ stylistic kinship with Benson has caused confusion between the two artists' oeuvres, as exemplified by the present triptych, which was long considered to be by Benson. It is possible that Claeissens worked in Benson’s workshop between 1520 and 1530, before becoming a master in his own right. Here Claeissens adopts Benson’s palette of warm ochres, dark reds and greens; yet, unlike Benson’s sparsely populated panels, Claeissens expands the crowds of people witnessing Christ’s miracle and the preachings of Saint John.
Till-Holger Borchert, to whom we are grateful for proposing the attribution on the basis of photographs, has suggested dating this painting to the mid-1530s, immediately after Claeissens left Benson’s workshop but before he set up his own on the Oude Zak in 1540 (private communication, 2026).
There is scant documentary evidence of Claeissens’ artistic production and since 2013 only five signed paintings have been identified, around which his oeuvre has been reconstructed. One such work also depicts Saint John on the island Patmos (fig. 1, private collection). The composition of both the present right wing and the later singular panel derive from Hans Memling’s painting of the same theme (Memlingmuseum, Bruges), with the saint seated on a rocky outcrop, an open book on his lap. His visions appear in the sky at upper left, and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse trailing a winding path into the background. Here, Claeissens distills the saint’s vision, focusing on Revelation chapters 6:1-8, and 12-13, which describe the release of the Four Horsemen, and the apparition of the woman ‘clothed with the sun, with the moon at her feet’, and the red dragon with seven heads.
Claeissens’ stylistic kinship with Benson has caused confusion between the two artists' oeuvres, as exemplified by the present triptych, which was long considered to be by Benson. It is possible that Claeissens worked in Benson’s workshop between 1520 and 1530, before becoming a master in his own right. Here Claeissens adopts Benson’s palette of warm ochres, dark reds and greens; yet, unlike Benson’s sparsely populated panels, Claeissens expands the crowds of people witnessing Christ’s miracle and the preachings of Saint John.
Till-Holger Borchert, to whom we are grateful for proposing the attribution on the basis of photographs, has suggested dating this painting to the mid-1530s, immediately after Claeissens left Benson’s workshop but before he set up his own on the Oude Zak in 1540 (private communication, 2026).
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
