.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
Lot Essay
The exquisite brass sculpture of Maitreya, the Buddha of the Future, belongs to an elite category of sacred objects whose technical brilliance points directly to the highest tiers of royal patronage. In the tenth- and eleventh-century West Tibet, the production of high-quality metalwork went through a dramatic shift in style demonstrated by the gifted Kashmiri artists of the time. These commissions were supported by the ruling elite of the Purang-Guge Kingdom in the Ngari region. Small, highly refined portable sculptures of this extraordinary caliber were intentionally commissioned for private royal chapels and elite collections, serving as premier examples of this tenth-century transition which continued almost unchanged through the eleventh century.
This specific Maitreya shares its sophisticated craftsmanship with a rare corpus of Kashmiri bronzes that once belonged to the private collection of Prince Nagaraja. Nagaraja was the eldest son of Yeshe-O (c. 959–1040), the influential Buddhist monarch who ruled the Purang-Guge Kingdom. Ulrich von Schroeder has meticulously identified an elite group of about twenty large, high-quality bronze objects linked to this specific prince, frequently marked by short, punched inscriptions reading na ga or lha na ga ra ja (von Schroeder, Buddhist Sculptures in Tibet, Vol. I, 2001, pp. 84-7 & 126-7, nos. 28A-D). Grander examples held in the Cleveland Museum of Art (1966.30) and the Potala Palace in Lhasa bear longer inscriptions that explicitly connect them to Nagaraja, illustrating that he and his father were principal drivers of the Chidar, the historical era known as the Later Diffusion of Buddhism to Tibet. To revive monastic and philosophical traditions, Yeshe-O invited the Indian master Atisha (982–1054) to the royal monastery of Tholing. Collaborating for three years with Tibetan scholars like Rinchen Zangpo (958–1055), Atisha developed the philosophical teachings that ultimately laid the groundwork for the Kadam school of Tibetan Buddhism.
The stylistic mastery of this sculpture reflects the complex evolution of Kashmiri art, which reached a pinnacle of international prestige by the eleventh century. Rather than developing in isolation, the Kashmiri style absorbed centuries of artistic exchange along trade routes. The visual traits of this figure, including its powerful physique, elongated proportions, thick ringlets of hair, sensuous expression, and this a nimbus, illustrated here, that developed only starting in the tenth-century.
Within the elite corpus of tenth- and eleventh-century Kashmiri-style bronzes from Nagaraja’s circle, three standing figures provide comparative examples to this sculpture. These include an Avalokiteshvara in the Museum Rietberg, Zürich (Uhlig, 1995, pp. 88–89, no. 43), an Amoghapasha in the Musée Guimet, Paris (Heller, Tibetan Art, 1984, p. 66 , no. 33), and a smaller Maitreya figure from the Western Himalayas (Pal, Himalayas: An Aesthetic Adventure, 2003, p. 140, no. 89)). Additionally, the distinctive facial typology of this sculpture is mirrored in a seated Kashmiri figure of Maitreya as a Buddha, formerly in the Pan-Asian Collection (von Schroeder, Indo-Tibetan Bronzes, 1981, pp. 128–129, no. 21C).
This specific Maitreya shares its sophisticated craftsmanship with a rare corpus of Kashmiri bronzes that once belonged to the private collection of Prince Nagaraja. Nagaraja was the eldest son of Yeshe-O (c. 959–1040), the influential Buddhist monarch who ruled the Purang-Guge Kingdom. Ulrich von Schroeder has meticulously identified an elite group of about twenty large, high-quality bronze objects linked to this specific prince, frequently marked by short, punched inscriptions reading na ga or lha na ga ra ja (von Schroeder, Buddhist Sculptures in Tibet, Vol. I, 2001, pp. 84-7 & 126-7, nos. 28A-D). Grander examples held in the Cleveland Museum of Art (1966.30) and the Potala Palace in Lhasa bear longer inscriptions that explicitly connect them to Nagaraja, illustrating that he and his father were principal drivers of the Chidar, the historical era known as the Later Diffusion of Buddhism to Tibet. To revive monastic and philosophical traditions, Yeshe-O invited the Indian master Atisha (982–1054) to the royal monastery of Tholing. Collaborating for three years with Tibetan scholars like Rinchen Zangpo (958–1055), Atisha developed the philosophical teachings that ultimately laid the groundwork for the Kadam school of Tibetan Buddhism.
The stylistic mastery of this sculpture reflects the complex evolution of Kashmiri art, which reached a pinnacle of international prestige by the eleventh century. Rather than developing in isolation, the Kashmiri style absorbed centuries of artistic exchange along trade routes. The visual traits of this figure, including its powerful physique, elongated proportions, thick ringlets of hair, sensuous expression, and this a nimbus, illustrated here, that developed only starting in the tenth-century.
Within the elite corpus of tenth- and eleventh-century Kashmiri-style bronzes from Nagaraja’s circle, three standing figures provide comparative examples to this sculpture. These include an Avalokiteshvara in the Museum Rietberg, Zürich (Uhlig, 1995, pp. 88–89, no. 43), an Amoghapasha in the Musée Guimet, Paris (Heller, Tibetan Art, 1984, p. 66 , no. 33), and a smaller Maitreya figure from the Western Himalayas (Pal, Himalayas: An Aesthetic Adventure, 2003, p. 140, no. 89)). Additionally, the distinctive facial typology of this sculpture is mirrored in a seated Kashmiri figure of Maitreya as a Buddha, formerly in the Pan-Asian Collection (von Schroeder, Indo-Tibetan Bronzes, 1981, pp. 128–129, no. 21C).