Lot Essay
On his death in 1917, approximately 150 wax sculptures were found in Degas' studio. His heirs drew up a contract with the Hébrard foundry in Paris authorizing seventy-four figures, including Cheval franchissant un obstacle, to be cast in bronze, each in an edition of twenty-two. One complete set was reserved for the Artist's heirs, marked HER, another for the founder, marked HER.D and the remaining twenty sets were numbered from A to T. The present work bears the inscription '48H' where the '48' refers to the subject's number in the inventory made of the wax models.
"Cheval franchissant un obstacle is the most spatially sophisticated of all Degas'horses. Related to a pose seen in Muybridge's photographs, it combines forward, backward, rising, and twisting motions in the closest approximation of a centripetal spiralling movement possible with a four-legged animal. The turning of the head, the spreading of the rear legs, and the fact that from the side one sees both forelegs (they are not parallel) all discourage a planar reading of the piece by de-emphasizing its profile. The fact that the horse rises on its hind legs has allowed Degas to bring the front and the hind legs into greater proximity than in any other of his horses, thereby permitting him to make infinitely finer adjustments of the sculptural spaces. (Charles W. Millard, The Sculpture of Edgar Degas, Princeton, 1976, p. 100)
"Cheval franchissant un obstacle is the most spatially sophisticated of all Degas'horses. Related to a pose seen in Muybridge's photographs, it combines forward, backward, rising, and twisting motions in the closest approximation of a centripetal spiralling movement possible with a four-legged animal. The turning of the head, the spreading of the rear legs, and the fact that from the side one sees both forelegs (they are not parallel) all discourage a planar reading of the piece by de-emphasizing its profile. The fact that the horse rises on its hind legs has allowed Degas to bring the front and the hind legs into greater proximity than in any other of his horses, thereby permitting him to make infinitely finer adjustments of the sculptural spaces. (Charles W. Millard, The Sculpture of Edgar Degas, Princeton, 1976, p. 100)