Wim Schuhmacher (1894-1988)
Christie's charge a buyer's premium of 20% (VAT in… Read more
Wim Schuhmacher (1894-1988)

Vrouw in duinen (Melitta)

Details
Wim Schuhmacher (1894-1988)
Vrouw in duinen (Melitta)
signed lower right W. Schuhmacher
oil on canvas
100 x 81 cm
Executed between 1939-1950
Provenance
Screeno Tex BV, Amsterdam
S.L. Tjoa, Amsterdam
Literature
Jan van Geest, Wim Schuhmacher - De Meester van het Grijs, Spanbroek 1997, cat.no. 221, pp. 183 (ill.) and 234.
Exhibited
Amsterdam, Stedelijk Museum, De Groep, 1 October-15 November 1948
Amsterdam, Stedelijk Museum, Wim Schuhmacher 1894-1954, 29 April-30 May 1954, cat.no. 56
Arnhem, Gemeentemuseum Arnhem, Portrettisten, 22 March-14 June 1959, cat.no. 84
Rotterdam, Museum Boymans-van Beuningen, Wim Schuhmacher, 8 December 1974-19 January 1975, cat.no. 57
Amsterdam, Stedelijk Museum, Wim Schuhmacher, 1 February-23 March 1975, cat.no. 57
Special notice
Christie's charge a buyer's premium of 20% (VAT inclusive) for this lot.

Lot Essay

Until 1926 portraits and landscapes were two strictly separate painting tasks for Wim Schuhmacher. In that year he first combined the two in Oude vrouw in Italiaans landschap (Jan van Geest, cat.no. 102, pp. 121 and 216), where a hilly landscape forms the background for a portrait of an old lady. After being almost emphatically absent in his earlier landscapes the human figure from then on plays a role in some of them. Through art history the combination of figures and nature can be found, from the early romantic work of Johann Tischbein to the late 19th century portraits by Henri Rousseau, all possible sources of inspiration to Schuhmacher. The initial scarcity of human figures in Schuhmacher's landscapes may be explained by the fear of losing some of the timelessness of his vast landscapes. If the figures did appear they were diminutive within nature. Their presence almost casual, like a branch or a stone. The present lot shows Melitta, the wife of the artist, in a contemplating pose, seemingly unaware of the dunes surrounding her. Unlike his other woman's portraits in nature, f.i. Portret van mevrouw D.(Van Geest, cat.no. 164), Portret van Adine Mees (cat.no. 153) and even Vrouw met rode mantel (cat.no. 130) from 1930, where the sitters sometimes seemed 'lost' in their landscape, the role of the sitter in the present lot is much more modest. Painted in the same subtle colour scheme as her surrounding, Melitta almost naturally seems to make part of it.

More from TWENTIETH CENTURY ART

View All
View All