Lot Essay
The attribution of the present painting to Rembrandt went unquestioned until it was challenged by Horst Gerson in 1969. While Jakob Rosenberg (op. cit.) considered it an 'incisive study', Gerson (op. cit.) found it 'much harder in execution'.
Dr. Werner Sumowski, in a letter dated March 4, 1996, attributes the present painting, from a transparency, to Govaert Flinck. In another letter, dated Feb. 2, 1996 he compares the painting to two other imaginary portraits of old men by Flinck: one sold at Christie's, London, Dec. 11, 1992, lot 79 (£60,000), (W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 1983, VI, p. 3708, no. 22796, illustrated p. 3869); and the other in the Gemäldegalerie, Cassel (Sumowski, op. cit., V, p. 3100, no. 2084, illustrated p. 3216).
Dr. Werner Sumowski, in a letter dated March 4, 1996, attributes the present painting, from a transparency, to Govaert Flinck. In another letter, dated Feb. 2, 1996 he compares the painting to two other imaginary portraits of old men by Flinck: one sold at Christie's, London, Dec. 11, 1992, lot 79 (£60,000), (W. Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 1983, VI, p. 3708, no. 22796, illustrated p. 3869); and the other in the Gemäldegalerie, Cassel (Sumowski, op. cit., V, p. 3100, no. 2084, illustrated p. 3216).