Attributed To THÉODORE GÉRICAULT (1791-1824)

Details
Attributed To THÉODORE GÉRICAULT (1791-1824)

Homme nu à mi-corps

signed (?) 'Géricault'--oil on canvas
39 x 32in. (99 x 81.2cm.)
Provenance
Baron de Quinto-Valdelomar Montoya; Lepke, Berlin, April, 16 1912, no.47
Otto Ackermann
Hans E. Bühler; Christie's, November 15, 1985, Lot 6 (35,000 as by Théodore Géricault)
Literature
P. Dubaut, Les Romantiques au Musée des Beaux-Arts de Poitiers, Dibutade I, Poitiers, 1954, pp.45-7
L. Eitner, Géricault at Winterthur, Burlington Magazine, August 1954, p.257
P. Dubaut and P. Nathan, Géricault 1791-1824, Sammlung Hans E. Bühler, Winterthur, 1956, no.4
P. Grunchec, Tout l'Oeuvre peint de Géricault, Paris, 1978, no.61 L. Eitner, Review of Grunchec's 'Tout l'Oeuvre ... ', Burlington Magazine, March 1980, p.206, no.61
G. Bazin, Théodore Géricault, 1987, II, no.128 (Illus)
Exhibited
Winterthur Kunstmuseum, Winterthurer Privatbesitz, 1942
Winterthur Kunstmuseum, Théodore Géricault, 1953, no.4

Lot Essay

Grunchec points out that the model shown here posed in this attitude in 1813 for a prize competed for by twenty pupils at the École des Beaux-Arts won by A. Pagnest (1790-1819). His sketch shows the model from an appreciably different position. It is difficult to confirm definitely that Géricault took part in this competition as the archives are deficient. Professor L. Eitner (1954) accepts the picture as a 'reasonable attribution' but later expresses doubts (1980), although admitting that it is qualitatively the best of the group of studies of this model.
In a recent letter, dated July 30, 1995, Eitner states that he is now inclined to accept the attrubution, though with some reservations. Grunchec, who in 1979 fully accepted this picture, more recently (1991) began to share Eitner's doubts. 'The Painting is of high quality, but there is something in its rather dry realism that does not entirely square with what I know of Géricault's work between the Charging Chasseur of 1812 and the Wounded Cuirassier of 1814. The signature is a curious feature: studies submitted in the concours de torse were unsigned, as Grunchec points out; it is of course possible that a signature was added at some later date'. Technical investigation of the signature at the time of the Bühler sale in 1985 showed the signature to be contemporary.
We are grateful to Professor Eitner for his help in cataloguing this picture.

More from Nureyev

View All
View All