Lot Essay
This charming painting of Cézanne's Aixois friends, the artist Fortuné Marion (1846-1900) and the writer Antony Valabrègue (1844- 1900) is one of the few early pictures by Cézanne that can be securely dated. Lawrence Gowing observes in Cézanne: The Early Years, "One more picture can be documented to 1866, Marion and Valabrègue setting out for the Motif, a sketch from nature on the theme of friendship, showing Valabrègue and Marion setting out to look for a landscape motif, the latter with an easel on his back - a picture which was to be painted outdoors. The months of intensive effort in the studio left Cézanne with the belief that pictures painted indoors would never be as good as those done in the open air; it was the nucleus of the convictions about painting from nature that he acted on five years later'.
Cézanne referred to this picture in a letter to Emile Zola of about 19 October 1866, "I have already spoken to you about a picture I want to attempt, it will represent Marion and Valabrègue setting out to look for a motif. The sketch which Guillemet considers good and which I did after nature makes everything else seem bad." In the margin of the letter (see W. Andersen, Cézanne's Portrait Drawings, Cambridge, Mass., 1970, no. 241) Cézanne makes a small pen and ink 'thumbnail' drawing of the present picture. The painter Antoine Guillemet had obviously visited Cézanne's studio and seen the picture and expressed his approval which in turn excited Cézanne's own pleasurable reaction in the letter to Zola. A less happy participant was Antony Valabrègue who, in turn, had written to Zola on 2 October 1866, "At the present time Marion and I are posing for him. We are arm in arm, and have hideous shapes. Paul is a horrible painter as regards the poses he gives people in the midst of his riots of colour. Every time he paints one of his friends it seems as though he were revenging himself on him for some hidden injury".
Cézanne's intention to work up a large composition from this small picture was obviously too ambitious and he added a postscript to Guillemet's letter to Zola on 2 November 'I must tell you, however, that as you feared, my big picture of Valabrègue and Marion has not been done'. A brief pencil drawing for the present smaller version is in the Kunstmuseum, Basle (see W. Andersen, op.cit., no. 242).
Marion et Valabrègue partant pour le motif demonstrates the preoccupation of Cézanne and the trend of his development at this crucial stage in his self-discovery. Moving from the early studio based, violent palette-knife pictures, he now indicates a desire to escape the studio and get out into the open countryside and to tone down the earlier vehemence of his technique. Roger Fry in his early appreciation of the pictures in the Pellerin collection wrote, "It is generally in small works thrown off by the way that an artist reveals the underlying trend of his nature...In them the profounder and more unconscious needs have full play..." and of this picture, "The colour is here of importance. Black still plays a large part, in the tall hats and clothes of the men. The tree has still the heavy dark tones of this period, but in the landscape viridians, cadmium greens and oranges appear, and these announce a new orientation towards a richer, more varied, more modulated harmony, one less reminiscent of "museum pictures", one more influenced by a direct outlook on nature. One feels here the evidence of a more curious observation, a more alert vision" (Cézanne, a study of his development, London, 1927, p. 28). This move to a lighter palette was noticed at the time by Guillemet who observed to Pissarro in a letter of 23 October 1866, "Cézanne has done some very beautiful paintings. He is painting in light tones again".
When, 33 years later, the Jas de Bouffan was sold and the studio cleared "Cézanne is said to have burned a number of large canvases which were figure compositions executed with the knife - pictures which, if they were correctly described, are quite hard to imagine, unless Marion and Valabrègue was among them" (L. Gowing, in Cézanne, The Early Years, London, 1988, p. 11).
Marion and Valabrègue were two of Cézanne's closest companions in these early Aix days. Marion is said to have followed Cézanne's example and used the palette knife to execute a series of paintings in imitation of Cézanne's style. A view of Aix of circa 1866 is in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge and indeed a painting of the Church of St. Jean-de-Malte in Aix formerly ascribed to Cézanne (Venturi 49) was, upon being cleaned, discovered to carry the signature of Marion. Marion was later to turn to science and became a director of The Natural History Museum in Marseilles. In Cézanne's painting he is depicted on the left wearing a Barbizon hat and with an easel and canvas roll strapped on his back.
Valabrègue evidently did not enjoy posing for Cézanne as he reported in a letter to Zola, "luckily I had to pose for only one day, but the uncle serves as a model more often." In fact Cézanne made three portraits of Valabrègue (Venturi 126-128). In 1866 Valabrègue was an aspiring writer producing, according to Guillemet, at least a poem a day. Valabrègue later forsook poetry and became a historian and critic. His friendship with Cézanne ceased after this early period.
Cézanne referred to this picture in a letter to Emile Zola of about 19 October 1866, "I have already spoken to you about a picture I want to attempt, it will represent Marion and Valabrègue setting out to look for a motif. The sketch which Guillemet considers good and which I did after nature makes everything else seem bad." In the margin of the letter (see W. Andersen, Cézanne's Portrait Drawings, Cambridge, Mass., 1970, no. 241) Cézanne makes a small pen and ink 'thumbnail' drawing of the present picture. The painter Antoine Guillemet had obviously visited Cézanne's studio and seen the picture and expressed his approval which in turn excited Cézanne's own pleasurable reaction in the letter to Zola. A less happy participant was Antony Valabrègue who, in turn, had written to Zola on 2 October 1866, "At the present time Marion and I are posing for him. We are arm in arm, and have hideous shapes. Paul is a horrible painter as regards the poses he gives people in the midst of his riots of colour. Every time he paints one of his friends it seems as though he were revenging himself on him for some hidden injury".
Cézanne's intention to work up a large composition from this small picture was obviously too ambitious and he added a postscript to Guillemet's letter to Zola on 2 November 'I must tell you, however, that as you feared, my big picture of Valabrègue and Marion has not been done'. A brief pencil drawing for the present smaller version is in the Kunstmuseum, Basle (see W. Andersen, op.cit., no. 242).
Marion et Valabrègue partant pour le motif demonstrates the preoccupation of Cézanne and the trend of his development at this crucial stage in his self-discovery. Moving from the early studio based, violent palette-knife pictures, he now indicates a desire to escape the studio and get out into the open countryside and to tone down the earlier vehemence of his technique. Roger Fry in his early appreciation of the pictures in the Pellerin collection wrote, "It is generally in small works thrown off by the way that an artist reveals the underlying trend of his nature...In them the profounder and more unconscious needs have full play..." and of this picture, "The colour is here of importance. Black still plays a large part, in the tall hats and clothes of the men. The tree has still the heavy dark tones of this period, but in the landscape viridians, cadmium greens and oranges appear, and these announce a new orientation towards a richer, more varied, more modulated harmony, one less reminiscent of "museum pictures", one more influenced by a direct outlook on nature. One feels here the evidence of a more curious observation, a more alert vision" (Cézanne, a study of his development, London, 1927, p. 28). This move to a lighter palette was noticed at the time by Guillemet who observed to Pissarro in a letter of 23 October 1866, "Cézanne has done some very beautiful paintings. He is painting in light tones again".
When, 33 years later, the Jas de Bouffan was sold and the studio cleared "Cézanne is said to have burned a number of large canvases which were figure compositions executed with the knife - pictures which, if they were correctly described, are quite hard to imagine, unless Marion and Valabrègue was among them" (L. Gowing, in Cézanne, The Early Years, London, 1988, p. 11).
Marion and Valabrègue were two of Cézanne's closest companions in these early Aix days. Marion is said to have followed Cézanne's example and used the palette knife to execute a series of paintings in imitation of Cézanne's style. A view of Aix of circa 1866 is in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge and indeed a painting of the Church of St. Jean-de-Malte in Aix formerly ascribed to Cézanne (Venturi 49) was, upon being cleaned, discovered to carry the signature of Marion. Marion was later to turn to science and became a director of The Natural History Museum in Marseilles. In Cézanne's painting he is depicted on the left wearing a Barbizon hat and with an easel and canvas roll strapped on his back.
Valabrègue evidently did not enjoy posing for Cézanne as he reported in a letter to Zola, "luckily I had to pose for only one day, but the uncle serves as a model more often." In fact Cézanne made three portraits of Valabrègue (Venturi 126-128). In 1866 Valabrègue was an aspiring writer producing, according to Guillemet, at least a poem a day. Valabrègue later forsook poetry and became a historian and critic. His friendship with Cézanne ceased after this early period.