Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680)
Christie's charges a Buyer's premium calculated at… Read more
Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680)

Vertumnus

Details
Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680)
Vertumnus
signed (strenghtened) ferdinand . b.. f lower left
oil on panel
69.4 x 53.3 cm
Provenance
William Drury-Lowe, Locko Park, Derbyshire, circa 1850.
Captain P.J.B. Drury-Lowe, Locko Park, Derbyshire.
Anon. Sale, Sotheby's, London, 19 May 1965, lot 2, as 'a fortune-teller'.
Literature
J.P.Richter, Catalogue of Picures at Locko Park, 1901, no.128, as French School, early 19th Century, depicting a fortune-teller A.Blankert, Ferdinand Bol, 1976, p.166, no.A 35.
A.Blankert, Ferdinand Bol, 1982, no.35, plate 1. J.Bruyn, in Oud Holland, 1983, no.97, p.209, p.215, note 1, as an old woman.
Exhibited
Leyden, Stedelijk Museum De Lakenhal, Rondom Rembrandt, 1968, no.2, ill.
Special notice
Christie's charges a Buyer's premium calculated at 20.825% of the hammer price for each lot with a value up to €90,000 (NLG 198.334). If the hammer price of a lot exceeds €90,000 then the hammer price of a lot is calculated at 20.825% of the first €90,000 plus 11.9% of any amount in excess of €90,000. Buyer's Premium is calculated on this basis for each lot individually.

Lot Essay

As noted by Blankert, 1982, loc. cit., this is probably Bol's earliest surviving work, datable to circa 1635. The spelling and format of the signature correspond with that on signed documents by Bol of 1635 and 1640. Stylistically, the picture is close to Jacob Gerritsz. Cuyp, to whom Bol is thought to have been apprenticed, as well as to artists of the Utrecht school, such as Abraham Bloemaert. The latter executed a series of paintings of old women during the 1630s, for example that, signed and dated 1632, in the Harrach collection, Austria (M.G. Roethlisberger, Abraham Bloemaert, 1993, I, no.518; II, fig.702). The influence of Utrecht is further illustrated by comparison with Moreelse's picture of Vertumnus and Pomona of circa 1630 (see the catalogue of the exhibition, God en de goden, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, 1980-1, no.18), in which Vertumnus is depicted making the same gesture as in the present work.
The iconography has been the subject of debate: Blankert believes the subject to be Vertumnus, and regards the picture as originally having been one of a pair, with a now lost Pomona; however Bruyn, loc. cit., rejected that view, regarding the subject as being an unidentified old woman. More recently, J. Hoogstraten, in a letter of 4 September 2001, has reconfirmed the identification as Vertumnus.

More from OLD MASTER PICTURES

View All
View All