LEIBNITZ, Gotffried Wilhelm von (1646-1716) & Jean BERNOULLI. Commercium Philosophicum et Mathematicum, Lausanne & Geneva: sumpt. Marci-Michaelis Bousquet & Socior., 1745, 2 volumes in one, 4°, FIRST EDITION, titles in red and black with engraved vignette, 23 folding engraved plates (lacking the engraved portrait of Leibnitz, perforation affecting one letter of title to vol. I, stamp on verso of title and accession number at foot of dedication leaf, small, neat repair to plate IV, perforation repeated on A3 in vol. II, light crease marks in the same vol.), library buckram. [Babson 196; Sotheran I, 2532; Honeyman 1975; Wallis 250]

Details
LEIBNITZ, Gotffried Wilhelm von (1646-1716) & Jean BERNOULLI. Commercium Philosophicum et Mathematicum, Lausanne & Geneva: sumpt. Marci-Michaelis Bousquet & Socior., 1745, 2 volumes in one, 4°, FIRST EDITION, titles in red and black with engraved vignette, 23 folding engraved plates (lacking the engraved portrait of Leibnitz, perforation affecting one letter of title to vol. I, stamp on verso of title and accession number at foot of dedication leaf, small, neat repair to plate IV, perforation repeated on A3 in vol. II, light crease marks in the same vol.), library buckram. [Babson 196; Sotheran I, 2532; Honeyman 1975; Wallis 250]

Lot Essay

"Important for containing the evidence, as embodied in the correspondence between Leibnitz and Jean Bernoulli, on the question of the rival claims to superiority in the invention of the calculus between Newton and Leibnitz," states Babson. "It was the only serious claim published in Leibnitz's favour and a tardy answer to the Commercium Epistolicum, which gave the evidence in Newton's favour." Nevertheless, as Babson adds, Leibnitz's notation was undoubtedly superior to Newton's fluxional one.

More from University of Chicago Rare Science Duplicates, Part 1

View All
View All