A MASSIVE TABRIZ CARPET
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VA… Read more
A MASSIVE TABRIZ CARPET

NORTH WEST PERSIA, DATED AH 1309/1891-2 AD

Details
A MASSIVE TABRIZ CARPET
North West Persia, dated AH 1309/1891-2 AD
The shaded tomato-red field with delicate scrolling leafy tendrils terminating in daisy flowerheads around a large cusped indigo medallion with bold polychrome palmette design, radiating from a blood-red and apricot flowerhead and arabesque centrepiece, a similar smaller medallion above and below with pendants divided by pale grey inscription cartouches, the indigo spandrels similar, in a shaded tomato-red turtle-palmette and flowering leafy vine border, between lemon-yellow floral meander and indigo flowerhead minor stripes with shaded tomato-red outer border of continuous nasta'liq inscription overlaying delicate leafy vine, original short kilim strip and fringes at both ends, overall excellent pile, one area of light surface dying
32ft.8in. x 19ft.11in. (995cm. x 608cm.)
Provenance
By verbal tradition presented by Nasir al-Din Shah during his reign (1848-96) to a German Royal Family on his European visit in 1896. Thence by decent to the previous owner.
Special notice
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VAT at 17.5% will be added to the buyer's premium which is invoiced on a VAT inclusive basis

Lot Essay

The inscription cartouches flanking the central medallion contain a Persian couplet followed by the commissioning inscription which translates:
"Commissioned by Qalichi Tabrizi in one thousand and three hundred of hijra, the year 13[00]".

The verbal tradition within the German royal family though which this carpet has descended is that it was received as a gift from Nasir al-Din Shah. The date on the carpet, about which there can be no doubt as it is spelled out in letters as well as being in figures, means that it could either have been given as the result of an encounter in the Shah's second visit to Europe in 1878, or brought with him as an intended present on his third and last visit in 1889. The absence of any mention of a royal commission in the inscriptions on it makes the second of these two options the more probable.

More from Oriental Rugs and Carpets

View All
View All