Frans Francken II (Antwerp 1581-1642)
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VA… Read more THE DUCHY SAXE-MEININGEN AND THE DUCAL HOUSE 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Saxe-Meiningen, a possession of the Ernestine branch of the House of Wettin, became a separate duchy in 1681 under Duke Bernhard I (1649-1706). He chose Meiningen as his capital and commissioned the construction of Elisabethenburg Castle. The Ducal House of Saxe-Meiningen was sovereign until 1918, when the German Empire became a Republic and Duke Bernhard III (1851-1928) had to resign. In 1920 Saxe-Meiningen became part of the newly established state of Thuringia. In the 19th Century, between 1821 and 1866, Duke Bernhard II (1800-1882) ruled Saxe-Meiningen. Bernhard guided his duchy into prosperity and continued to increase the Ducal art collection, purchasing important works of art. In addition he commissioned the construction of the first theatre in Meiningen and Landsberg Castle. Bernhard's sister Princess Adelaide (1792-1849), married the Duke of Clarence, the future King William IV, in 1818. Bernhard's broadminded son, the Hereditary Prince (from 1866 Duke) Georg II (1826-1914) continued the ancestral tradition of support and patronage of the arts. Meiningen became a centre of European music: composers, such as Johannes Brahms, who dedicated his Gesang der Parzen op. 89 to Georg II, Richard Wagner, Richard Strauss and Max Reger performed in Meiningen. The Meiningen Court Theatre under the direction of Duke Georg II - who was also known as 'Theatre Duke' - had important influence on the development of the European and German theatre. Georg's love of fine arts is manifested in his commission of paintings by Italian and German masters. Georg's extraordinary artistic talent was passed on through the family, continued most notably by the line of the Barons von Saalfeld, established by his son Prince Ernst. After the Second World War, Thuringia was in the Communist controlled part of Germany. The property of Prince Ernst and his nephews, Prince Georg and Prince Bernhard, was confiscated; Prince Georg himself died in a Soviet Union prison camp in 1946. The family of Prince Georg and Prince Bernhard had to leave their ancestral home and a return was not possible until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. After the reunification of Germany in 1990, the family was faced with a completely altered political situation. In the ancestral tradition of support and patronage of the arts, the family waived its rights to large portions of the art collection for the benefit of the Cultural Foundation of Meiningen (Kulturstiftung Meiningen) and will participate in the future cultural development of Meiningen by holding a permanent seat on the Board of Trustees of the Foundation. As compensation for waiving its claim to the Ducal property, the following 11 paintings from the Ducal Gallery, among other works, were returned to the family. 2. THE ART COLLECTION AND THE DUCAL LIBRARY Various members of the family formed the Ducal art collection over the centuries. It contains important Old Master paintings from Dutch, Flemish, Spanish and Italian masters, as well as other important works of art. The most important have been preserved in Elisabethenburg Castle and much of the collection has been on public display since the 19th Century. In future it will be the responsibility of the Cultural Foundation of Meiningen to take care of the preservation and presentation of the Ducal collection, which is now once again open to the public. The collection of Old Master Paintings was officially published for the first time in 1865 in the Catalogue of the Ducal Gallery of Paintings in Meiningen. However, the acquisitions of Duke Georg II - with Duke Anton Ulrich (1687-1763) one of the two main collectors of the Ducal House - do not appear in that volume. In contrast with Anton Ulrich, who preferred Dutch, Flemish and German artists, Georg acquired in particular works by the Italian Masters and Schools for the collection. Due to theft, looting and the confiscation of the Ducal property after 1945, portions of the collection were dispersed or destroyed: indeed, to this day the whereabouts of fifty-two prominent paintings have yet to be established. Besides art, the Ducal collection also included an extraordinary library founded by Duke Bernhard I in the late 17th Century. Successive generations, and especially Duke Anton Ulrich (1687-1763), continued to add to the collection well into the 20th Century. It was one of the most significant Ducal libraries in Germany and was taken with a few exceptions to the Soviet Union by the occupying forces.
Frans Francken II (Antwerp 1581-1642)

The Idolatry of Solomon

Details
Frans Francken II (Antwerp 1581-1642)
The Idolatry of Solomon
signed 'D·j ffranck · IN f.' (lower left, on the pedestal)
oil on panel
21¼ x 29 7/8 in. (54 x 75.8 cm.)
Provenance
In the collection of the Gallery of the Dukes of Saxe-Meiningen, and by descent.
Literature
C.F. Foster, Katalog der Herzoglichen Gemäldegalerie zu Meiningen, Meiningen, 1865, p. 47, no. 103, as 'Franz D.G.'
Special notice
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VAT at 17.5% will be added to the buyer's premium which is invoiced on a VAT inclusive basis

Lot Essay

This picture has been apparently unpublished and unrecorded since its inclusion in the 1865 Sachsen-Meiningen inventory, although even then the identity of the artist was not recognised.

The subject is taken from 1 Kings XI, vv. 1-8: 'But king Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites; Of the nations concerning which the LORD said ... Ye shall not go in to them ... for surely they will turn away your heart ... after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love. And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart after other gods: Then did Solomon build an high place for [the gods] Chemosh ... and for Molech ... And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.'
The subject was popular in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, although for the most part in Protestant countries, where Solomon's heresy was used to comment upon the perceived idolatry of the Catholic church. Francken, by contrast was painting in the Spanish Netherlands, and so it might be suggested that his motive for depicting the subject owed as much to any religious undercurrent as to the opportunity to depict the lavishness of Solomon's court and, perhaps in particular, a few of his seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines (a supposition that may be somewhat substantiated by Francken's depiction of them with only a very passing nod to any idolatry in a picture in the Musée Massey, Tarbes, inv. no. 855.3.14).

Ursula Härting, in her 1989 monograph on Francken (Frans Francken der Jüngere, Freren, 1989, pp. 246-7, nos. 73-81), lists nine depictions by Francken of the present subject, including that in the J. Paul Getty Museum, California (inv. no. A71 P-42), whilst two further examples have been more recently sold: at Christie's, Amsterdam, 1 November 1996, lot 151; and Sotheby's, New York, 30 January 1998, lot 224 (the latter, which has been cut on the right hand side, painted in collaboration with Cornelis de Baellieur). The evident richness of the compositions - in part afforded by the subject matter - makes it unsurprising that of those versions, five are in museums: the J. Paul Getty Museum, California; the Palais des Beaux-Arts, Brussels; the Musée des Beaux-Arts, Clermont-Ferrand; the Musée des Beaux-Arts, Liège; and the Museum Brukenthal.

The present picture relates closest in composition to the version sold in these Rooms, 26 May 1975, lot 125 (dated by Härting, op. cit., no. 73, to circa 1615), and to that executed in collaboration with de Baellieur. All three are of particular interest in including, standing on the left of the composition in a red gown, a self-portrait of the artist (fig. 1). We are grateful to Dr. Ursula Härting for suggesting on the basis of photographs that the present work probably precedes her no. 73; if so, then its evident quality strongly suggests that it is the prime version of the subject.

More from OLD MASTER PICTURES

View All
View All