Lot Essay
Rembrandt's landscapes were etched in two fairly distinct periods - 1640-45 and 1650-52, with this print acting as a bridge between the two. In contrast to his first group (cf. lots 41, 42 and 46) where the focal building was isolated against a distant background, here he has begun to integrate the cottage into the landscape. In the later group (cf. lots 40, 43-4 and 48) the buildings are completely assimilated by their surroundings.
It is the only print in Rembrandt's work for which a direct, closely related preparatory study is known. One significant difference between the drawing and the etching is the presence here of a skull in the foreground. It endows the print with a broader meaning, suggesting the transitory nature of this idyllic rural scene. This type of overt symbolism is rare in Rembrandt's landscapes.
Reproduced actual size
It is the only print in Rembrandt's work for which a direct, closely related preparatory study is known. One significant difference between the drawing and the etching is the presence here of a skull in the foreground. It endows the print with a broader meaning, suggesting the transitory nature of this idyllic rural scene. This type of overt symbolism is rare in Rembrandt's landscapes.
Reproduced actual size