Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VA… Read more
Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn

The goldweigher's field (B., Holl. 234; H. 249)

Details
Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn
The goldweigher's field (B., Holl. 234; H. 249)
etching and drypoint, 1651, with part of a Pascal Lamb watermark (cf. A. & F., p. 153, A.a.), a very good, atmospheric impression, with burr, printed with a delicate tone, with vertical scratches throughout, with thread margins, slightly pale at the extreme right edge of the subject, the lower right corner skilfully made-up, an old vertical drying fold and two soft and unobtrusive diagonal creases noticeable on the reverse, otherwise in very good condition
(FPR 33)
P., S. 120 x 319 mm.
Provenance
Christie's, London, 30 November 1993, lot 178
Special notice
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VAT at 15% will be added to the buyer's premium which is invoiced on a VAT inclusive basis.

Lot Essay

This magnificent landscape represents a view from the dune Het Kopje near Haarlem. It is framed by the spires of Saint Bavo on the left and the church of Bloemendaal on the right, and in the left centre appears the Saxenburg estate of Rembrandt's creditor Cristofel Thijsz, from whom he borrowed money to buy his house in St. Anthoniesbreestraat. His failure to repay this debt would eventually lead to his bankruptcy. Perhaps this etching was done to appease his creditor, or it might record the frequent journeys he made to make his repayments.

Whatever the explanation, The goldweigher's field is one of the finest panoramas in Dutch 17th century art. Fields, trees, grasses and buildings are reduced to their most basic forms and yet imbued with a wonderful sense of movement and understanding of the underlying structure of the land. It resembles Rembrandt's drawing style more than any other of his landscape etchings. His precision and economy of technique is breathtaking, as is his use of blank areas to suggest distance and atmosphere. The representation is so accurate as to have prompted the idea that he worked on it out in the open, up on one of the dunes west of Haarlem.

The traditional title, used by Gersaint in 1751, is misleading. He was clearly under the mistaken belief that the estate was owned by the Amsterdam Receiver-General Jan Uytenbogaert, whose portrait Rembrandt etched under the title The goldweigher (B. 281).

More from A COLLECTOR'S VISION:THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF GAH BUISMAN JZN

View All
View All