Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VA… Read more
Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn

Faust (B., Holl. 270; H. 260)

Details
Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn
Faust (B., Holl. 270; H. 260)
etching with drypoint and engraving, circa 1652, the rare first state (of three), with burr to the left sleeve of his gown, with thread margins, two small thin patches at the right sheet edge where previously hinged verso, pale scattered foxing, otherwise in good condition
P. 211 x 160 mm., S. 214 x 163 mm.
Special notice
No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VAT at 15% will be added to the buyer's premium which is invoiced on a VAT inclusive basis. On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in lots consigned for sale which may include guaranteeing a minimum price or making an advance to the consignor that is secured solely by consigned property. This is such a lot. This indicates both in cases where Christie's holds the financial interest on its own, and in cases where Christie's has financed all or a part of such interest through a third party. Such third parties generally benefit financially if a guaranteed lot is sold successfully and may incur a loss if the sale is not successful.

Lot Essay

This is one of Rembrandt's most puzzling prints, and has been the subject of debate for over 300 years. The subject is clearly a scholar, surrounded by the tools of his trade - books, papers and an astrolabe. What is less clear is the significance of the apparition by which he is transfixed. A ghostly figure, surrounded by clouds, holds a mirror in its left hand, pointing to it with its right hand. To the left is a floating disc bearing an indistinct inscription, with the letters INRI at the centre. Whilst the current title was only coined in the early 18th century, it seems fairly safe to assume that this print is based on the legendary magician and alchemist: it is known that Christopher Marlowe's Tragical History of Doctor Faustus was performed in Amsterdam about 1650. One possible explanation is that the print shows the moment when a good angel, in the shape of the shimmering apparition, warns Faust not to enter into a pact with the devil. Another interpretation is that the print is meant to demonstrate that scholars, and mankind in general, no matter how keenly they search after knowledge, can only perceive the truth as if in a glass darkly - in other words indirectly and distorted. Human knowledge is limited, and it is only through Christ that we can partake of perfect knowledge hereafter.

Later impressions of the first state reveal that the plate was considerably worn. It is therefore likely that the subsequent work had been applied in order to rectify this problem, but research on the watermarks shows that the later states were almost certainly not by Rembrandt, and that this is the only state completely by the hand of the master.

More from Rembrandt 400

View All
View All