Bart van der Leck (1876-1958)
Artist's Resale Right ("Droit de Suite"). Artist's… 顯示更多 PROPERTY FROM A SWISS COLLECTOR
Bart van der Leck (1876-1958)

Aaronskelken; arums

細節
Bart van der Leck (1876-1958)
Aaronskelken; arums
signed with initials and dated 'BvdL/'29' (on the reverse) and signed and dated again and inscribed with title (on a label attached to the stretcher)
oil on canvas
58.5 x 33.5 cm.
Painted in 1929.
來源
The artist's studio.
Acquired from the above by H.P. Bremmer, The Hague, 1929.
Acquired from the above by Mr. and Mrs. J.G. Dusser de Barenne-Snellen, Utrecht/New Haven, 1929-1940 (bought for fl. 2.000).
By descent from the above to the previous owner, 1940.
Anonymous sale, Christie's, Amsterdam, 26 May 1988, lot 205.
Acquired at the above sale by the present owner.
注意事項
Artist's Resale Right ("Droit de Suite"). Artist's Resale Right Regulations 2006 apply to this lot, the buyer agrees to pay us an amount equal to the resale royalty provided for in those Regulations, and we undertake to the buyer to pay such amount to the artist's collection agent. '' ! '' Lots Imported from outside the EU. The buyer's premium is 48.75% incl. VAT over the first €20,000, plus 42.8% incl. VAT of the hammer price between €20,001 and €800.000, plus 33.28% incl. VAT of any amount in excess of 800.000.

榮譽呈獻

Else Valk
Else Valk

查閱狀況報告或聯絡我們查詢更多拍品資料

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

In 1916 Bart van der Leck met Piet Mondriaan (1872-1944) who, with his strict ordering of horizontals and verticals, his abstraction and rhythmic system of lines and planes, made a great impression on him. This meeting led to an abrupt and fundamental change in Van der Leck's style, who became co-founder of De Stijl in 1917. Although the neo-plastic idea must have helped Bart van der Leck to execute his artistic ideas, Piet Mondriaan's and Theo Van Doesburg's (1883-1931) radical and philosophically based method of abstraction did, in the end, not satisfy Van der Leck. By the end of 1918 he decided not to sign the De Stijl manifest. After 1921 Van der Leck no longer made totally abstract paintings. It is very likely that financial considerations played a role in this decision. Mrs. Kröller-Müller, one of his main supporters in the early years, did not welcome his move towards total abstraction.

From 1922 until 1931 Van der Leck mainly depended on the allowance he received on a regular basis from the art critic Hendricus Petrus Bremmer. In those years nearly every painting he produced was sent to Bremmer who in his turn tried to find a buyer among his rich art pupils. Often Bremmer did suggestions about sizes and subject matters, stating for instance that '(...) large dimensions are difficult to hang and to sell'. In a letter from 26 May 1922 Bremmer suggests Van der Leck: '(...) eens iets te maken naar aanleiding van witte lelies of van Aronskelken' (see: C. Hilhorst, Vriendschap op afstand. De correspondentie tussen Bart van der Leck en H.P. Bremmer, Bussum, 1999, p. 125). In his reply of 2 June 1922, Van der Leck takes up the challenge and writes his patron 'Van lelies of kelken maak ik zeker iets; een opgaaf is me altijd welkom; als ik eens voor zoo'n opgaaf niks voel zeg ik het wel of ik maak er niets voor, maar ik geloof ook dat ik alles kan maken' (see: Hilhorst, p. 126). And so he did, according to the paintings of lilies and arums Van der Leck made in the 1920's. The preliminary study for a similar composition (Abstract composition, 1927, now in the Museum of Modern Art, New York) shows a realistic image of flowers (fig. 1)(sold in these rooms on 4 December 2001, lot 212). Van der Leck would abstract the content, form and composition of the arums. The colours are no longer derived from the real world; the colour fields are distributed over the white background in such way that they, colour by colour, form the vertices of floral tangrams. The flower paintings rapidly became a financial success for Van der Leck, a success which he fairly shared with his patron Bremmer.

更多來自 <strong>印象派及現代藝術</strong>

查看全部
查看全部