Richard Prince (B. 1949)
Richard Prince (B. 1949)
1 更多
These lots have been imported from outside the EU … 顯示更多
Richard Prince (B. 1949)

Grassy Knoll

細節
Richard Prince (B. 1949)
Grassy Knoll
signed, titled and dated 'R. Prince 1992 Grassy Knoll' (on the reverse)
silkscreen and acrylic on two attached canvases
68 ¼ x 47 7/8in. (173.2 x 121.5cm.)
Executed in 1992
來源
Barbara Gladstone Gallery, New York.
Acquired from the above by the present owner in 1992.
展覽
Zurich, Kunsthalle Zürich, Richard Prince, 2002, p. 175 (illustrated in colour, p. 10). This exhibition later travelled to Wolfsburg, Kunstmusem Wolfsburg.
注意事項
These lots have been imported from outside the EU for sale using a Temporary Import regime. Import VAT is payable (at 5%) on the Hammer price. VAT is also payable (at 20%) on the buyer’s Premium on a VAT inclusive basis. When a buyer of such a lot has registered an EU address but wishes to export the lot or complete the import into another EU country, he must advise Christie's immediately after the auction.

拍品專文

Beginning with his introduction to the art world as part of the Pictures Generation in the 1970s, Richard Prince has built a career out of turning the conventions of art back on themselves to examine aspects of contemporary culture. Grassy Knoll is a classic example of Richard Prince’s Joke paintings, which emerged in 1985, when Prince was living in the back room of New York’s 303 Gallery. The jokes derived from newspapers and magazines like The New Yorker, or joke books. Dryly presented with a deadpan sensibility, the Joke paintings consist of visual expressions of humour that are disarmingly immediate and resonant, yet abstract in their presentation.
In Grassy Knoll, layered and juxtaposed silkscreened images of various plants are set amongst sinuous lines of type and decorative patterns that break up the composition. These tell a fragment of a joke about a visit to a psychiatrist—one of Prince’s favoured subjects. In the curious arrangement of content Prince’s Joke paintings are related to the work of his good friend Christopher Wool. While Wool’s work contains less explicit subject matter than Prince’s, there is a similar ambiguity around exact meaning, and a refusal of any easy, centralized narrative. Prince’s works also hark back to the Pop-inflected conceptualism of Ed Ruscha’s use of language in his word paintings, and John Baldessari’s text and image paintings, which sometimes strike a similar note in terms of humour, if using aesthetic and art historical terminology rather than the mass cultural material Prince favours.