Hendrick Goltzius 
(Mülbracht 1558-1617 Haarlem)
These lots have been imported from outside the EU … 显示更多 PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATE OF JOHN MICHAEL MONTIAS Born in Paris in 1928, John Michael Montias—or Michael Montias to those who knew him—was one of the most distinguished historians of the Dutch Golden Age in the second half of the twentieth century. Though he studied economics and received his PhD with a dissertation on Soviet bloc economics from Columbia University in 1958, by the mid-1970s his research came to focus largely on the economic underpinnings of artistic production in the Netherlands during the seventeenth century. His interest in the field had been piqued many years earlier when, as a teenager, he came across a copy of Wilhelm von Bode’s multi-volume study of Rembrandt.Montias’ first academic foray into Dutch art came in 1975 following a successful application for a summer grant to study the guild system in Holland, where his research focused on the Delft City Archives. This experience led to a lifelong fascination with the city and resulted in a number of publications that, for the first time, integrated statistical inquiries with a nuanced approach to cultural history, including the ground-breaking Artists and Artisans in Delft: A Socio-Economic Study of the Seventeenth Century (1982). The Delft archives also provided an opportunity for him to make indispensable contributions to the study of the city’s most famous resident: Johannes Vermeer.It would be difficult to overstate the impact of Montias’ research on Vermeer, the culmination of which was his seminal Vermeer and his Milieu: A Web of Social History (1989). Through the accumulation of more than 450 archival documents drawn from some 17 Dutch and Belgian archives, Montias made numerous discoveries about the artist and his family, the most substantive of which was his identification of Pieter van Ruijven as Vermeer’s principal patron for much of his career. Never one to sit still, Montias next turned his attention to the Amsterdam City Archives, paying particular attention to the long-ignored records relating to a series of auctions held by the city’s Orphan Chamber in the first half of the seventeenth century. These documents provided the basis for his final book, Art at Auction in seventeenth-century Amsterdam (2002). Having systematically analysed the records, Montias identified patterns in which buyers clustered in groups based on their familial relations, occupation, religion and interests; analysed the relative value of works based on subject matter and attribution; and isolated several case studies of art dealers and buyers who maintained special connections with artists, notably Rembrandt. Taken together, these studies provide a multifaceted picture of the activities of Amsterdam’s elite in the seventeenth century.This overarching interest in the mechanisms of art’s production and consumption naturally led Montias to acquire works of art for himself. Despite the constraints of a comparatively modest professor’s salary, he came to make a number of notable acquisitions, including in 1968 a Penitent Magdalene with an Angel by the great Haarlem Mannerist Hendrick Goltzius (offered here as lot ) and, while attending a preview at Christie’s in New York in 1979, a then-unattributed painting depicting an Allegory of the Love of Virtue. Though subsequently attributed to Valentin de Boulogne by Pierre Rosenberg and included as such in his seminal exhibition France in the Golden Age: Seventeenth-Century French Paintings in American Collections (1982), Montias remained convinced that it was instead by Giovanni del Campo based on his knowledge of a description of a painting with this subject in an archival document he had previously found in the Delft City Archives (sold Christie’s, New York, 30 October 2018, lot 70). Such was his memory that he could recall the slightest detail at the drop of a hat.
Hendrick Goltzius (Mülbracht 1558-1617 Haarlem)

The Penitent Magdalene with an Angel

细节
Hendrick Goltzius
(Mülbracht 1558-1617 Haarlem)
The Penitent Magdalene with an Angel
signed with monogram and dated 'HG. / 1610' (lower right, on the side of the stone)
oil on canvas
49 3/8 x 37 ½ in. (125.4 x 95.3 cm.)
来源
(Possibly) Anonymous sale [Property of a gentleman]; Foster, London, 16 April 1828, lot 53, as 'Magdalen and Angel' (4 gns. to Lawrence).
Edward Joseph Lowe (1825-1900), Shirenewton Hall, Chepstow (according to the RKD, The Hague).
Anonymous sale; Sotheby's, London, 15 January 1969, lot 63 (£400 to Betts, on behalf of the following).
with Duits, London.
with H. Schickman, New York, 1969, from whom acquired by the following,
John Michael Montias (1928-2005), New Haven, and by descent to the present owner.
出版
M. van der Vlist, Goltzius als Schilder, Ph.D. dissertation, 1974, pp. 36-37, no. 13.
C. Whitfield, Discoveries from the Cinquecento, London and New York, 1982, p. 40.
L.W. Nichols, '"Job in Distress," A Newly-discovered Painting by Hendrick Goltzius', Simiolus, XIII, 1983, p. 182, note 2.
H. Dauer, Staatliches Museum Schloß Mosigkau: Katalog der Gemälde alter Bestand, Dessau, 1988, p. 22, where incorrectly stated that L. Nichols attributed the painting to Willem Willemsz. van der Vliet.
P.C. Sutton, 'Recent Patterns of Public and Private Collecting of Dutch Art', in Great Dutch Paintings from America, B. Broos, ed., exhibition catalogue, The Hague and San Francisco, 1990-1991, p. 114, fig. 15.
E.J. Sluijter, 'Venus, Visus en Pictura', Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, XLII-XLIII, 1991-1992, p. 385, note 82.
P.J.J. van Thiel, Cornelis Cornelisz. van Haarlem, 1562-1638: A Monograph and Catalogue Raisonné, Doornspijk, 1999, p. 128.
'Onder den Oranje Boom': Niederländische Kunst und Kultur im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert an deutschen Fürstenhöfen, H. Lademacher, ed., exhibition catalogue, Krefeld, Oranienbaum and Apeldoorn, 1999-2000, p. 356, note 3.
S. Slive, 'Collecting 17th-century Dutch art in the United States: the current boom', Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum, XLIX, 2001, p. 92.
L. Nichols, The Paintings of Hendrick Goltzius, 1558-1617: A Monograph and Catalogue Raisonné, Doornspijk, 2013, pp. 122-123, no. A-24, pl. 25.
展览
Poughkeepsie, Vassar College Art Gallery, Dutch Mannerism: Apogee and Epilogue, 15 April-7 June 1970, no. 48.
New Haven, Yale University Art Gallery, Dutch Religious Art of the Seventeenth Century, 1975, no. 29.
New Brunswick, The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, Haarlem: The Seventeenth Century, 20 February-17 April 1983, no. 60.
New Haven, Yale University Art Gallery, 1977-1979 and 1988-2002, on loan.
New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, December 2004-2015, on loan.
注意事项
These lots have been imported from outside the EU for sale using a Temporary Import regime. Import VAT is payable (at 5%) on the Hammer price. VAT is also payable (at 20%) on the buyer’s Premium on a VAT inclusive basis. When a buyer of such a lot has registered an EU address but wishes to export the lot or complete the import into another EU country, he must advise Christie's immediately after the auction.

荣誉呈献

Clementine Sinclair
Clementine Sinclair

拍品专文

Painted with the bold colours, subtle brushwork and dramatic use of light and shadow which typify the artist’s mature style, The Penitent Magdalene with an Angel is a beautiful example of the work of Hendrick Goltzius, a pivotal figure in the transition from Dutch Mannerism to Classicism. Having begun his career as one of the most significant engravers of late-sixteenth century Europe - Goltzius worked in Haarlem, a prosperous city in the Northern Netherlands, where his animated and popular designs established the Mannerist aesthetic across Northern Europe - in 1600, Goltzius turned to painting, rapidly reaching the same level of accomplishment which he had attained with his graphic works.
Revered as a model for contemplative devotion and an icon of redemptive piety, Mary Magdalene’s significance had grown in Europe since the early Middle Ages and the saint rapidly became a popular figure in devotional painting. Goltzius himself seems to have favoured the subject, in addition to producing numerous graphic works (see for example fig. 1), he executed at least two other individual paintings of the saint - a Magdalene of circa 1612-15 in Lillington Church, Leamington Spa, and a Penitent Magdalene of 1614 in Museum Schloss Mosigkau, Dessau - and included her at the foot of the Cross in his Crucifixion of circa 1605 in the Staatliche Kunsthalle, Karlsruhe. For the majority of these depictions, Goltzius adopted the traditional iconography of the Magdalene as a penitent sinner, withdrawn from the material world following Christ’s Passion, as popularised by medieval accounts of the saint’s life.
In this painting, which is dated 1610, the Magdalene is shown in a rocky landscape, reminiscent of the cave to which she withdrew after Christ’s death and Resurrection, kneeling in a state of tearful penitence. Her richly coloured blue cloak and lustrously patterned dress beneath refer to her former life as a sinner. Unique among Goltzius’ representations of the Magdalene, an angel is included beside her, guiding her devotions through a large, open book, in which the numbers ‘140’ and ‘143’ are clearly visible, referencing Psalm numbers (Nichols, op. cit., p. 123, note 6). Psalms 140-143 all consist of pleas for salvation from God; Psalm 141, to which the angel gestures, begins: ‘I cried unto the Lord with my voice; with my voice unto the Lord did I make my supplication…O Lord: I said, Thou art my refuge’. The Madgalene’s attribute of an ointment jar, to anoint Christ’s body, is beautifully rendered on the grass in front her, while the skull prominently positioned in the foreground symbolises her contemplation on worldly vanity and death. The twisting vine of ivy which grows over the rock before her was often used as an emblem of both death and of immortality, while the dandelion carefully depicted at the lower right of the picture was frequently used as a symbol of Christ’s Passion and Resurrection.
Goltzius was clearly aware of the visual precedents for depicting the Penitent Magdalene. His most direct and obvious source seems to have been Cornelis Cort’s engraving after Titian of this subject (fig. 2). The positioning of the Magdalene’s arms, one crossed over her body to hold her striped cloak and the other using her hair to cover her breast, as well as the rocky outcrop, which gives way to a distant mountainous landscape in this painting, all clearly evidence Goltzius’ knowledge of Titian’s example. That the Venetian painter’s Magdalene was known in Haarlem can be seen in an even more pronounced way in Goltzius’ later Penitent Magdalene at Dessau, which very closely follows Titian’s composition.

更多来自 古典大师及英国绘画 (晚间拍卖)

查看全部
查看全部