ACCUM, Friedrich Christian (1769-1838). A Treatise on the Adulterations of Food, and culinary Poisons, London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, 1820, 12°, FIRST EDITION, engraved vignette in red and black to title, illustrations (title lightly spotted, otherwise clean with good margins), contemporary half calf and marbled boards (joints cracked but cords holding, light wear to extremities). [cf. Austin 16; Bitting, p. 2; Duveen, p. 3; GM 1604.2; Wellcome II, p. 11]

细节
ACCUM, Friedrich Christian (1769-1838). A Treatise on the Adulterations of Food, and culinary Poisons, London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, 1820, 12°, FIRST EDITION, engraved vignette in red and black to title, illustrations (title lightly spotted, otherwise clean with good margins), contemporary half calf and marbled boards (joints cracked but cords holding, light wear to extremities). [cf. Austin 16; Bitting, p. 2; Duveen, p. 3; GM 1604.2; Wellcome II, p. 11]

来源
J. Seacome, Chester, bookseller's ticket; W. A. Silvester, stamp to endpaper; Samuel Davies, 12 Bridge Street Row, Chester, bookplate.

拍品专文

This was the first systematic and "thoroughly dispassionate" survey of the growing problem of food adulteration. Among the many frauds Accum exposed were the use of alum for whitening inferior grades of flour; the use of cheap substitutes, sometimes poisonous, for malt and hops in the brewing of beer; tea that was manufactured from native English hedgerows; the poisonous pickles which owed their green colour to copper; the nutty flavour in wines produced by bitter almonds, the rind of Gloucester cheese coloured with vermillion and red lead; and the pepper adulterated with the sweepings of the warehouse floors. His book attracted immediate public attention. The first edition of a thousand copies sold out in less than a month, and a fourth edition had appeared within two years. "Yet the book had no immediate effect in reducing adulteration - indeed, it is quite possible that in exposing the techniques of fraud Accum instructed others in the very art he wished to suppress ... In April 1821 he was indicted by the managers of the Royal Institution for mutilating books in their library ... and he chose to leave the country rather than face public trial and disgrace ... public opinion swung sharply against the man who had been for a time London's most popular scientist, friends deserted and his old publishers refused to handle any more of his work" (John Burnett, Plenty and Want, 1966, pp. 76-77).