.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
Lot Essay
‘… in the present portrait, [Ib] seems able to silently share her inner life with her father’ (Catherine Lampert)
Tender and intimate, Ib (1990) is a jewel-like portrait of Lucian Freud’s daughter Isobel Boyt. Her features are sculpted from thick impasto, marbled with rich tones of ivory, peach, bronze and umber. Freud captures the delicate flush of her cheeks and the play of light across her brow, his brushwork alive with the newfound expressive freedom that came to define his works of the 1990s. Ib was the third of four children that Freud shared with his former lover and muse Suzy Boyt. She became one of his most treasured subjects and sat for a total of six major paintings—two of which are held in museum collections—as well as a further unfinished portrait. A successor to the 1983-1984 masterpiece of the same title, the present example belongs to the celebrated body of portrait heads that flourished at the height of Freud’s powers. It featured in his landmark touring exhibition at the Whitechapel Gallery, London in 1993, as well as his major retrospective at Tate Britain, London in 2002.
As Freud’s celebrity and ambition reached new heights throughout the 1980s, he found himself drawn increasingly back to his family. His relationships with his adult children grew stronger and deeper over hours in the studio, often making up for years of childhood absence. Suzy Boyt had met Freud while studying at the Slade School of Art during the 1950s, and sat for the pivotal portrait Woman Smiling (1958-1959). Ib, born in 1961, featured as a seven-year-old in the 1968-1969 masterwork Large Interior, Paddington (Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid). Following a wild escapade to Trinidad with their mother, the Boyt siblings reconnected with their father during adolescence, with Ib sitting for a full-length portrait now held in the Cleveland Art Museum, Ohio. Other offspring—including Bella and Esther Freud, daughters of Bernardine Coverley—would also feature with increasing intensity throughout the 1970s and 1980s. ‘If you’re not there when they are in the nest you can be more there later’, said Freud (L. Freud, quoted in W. Feaver, Lucian Freud, London 2002, p. 20).
By the time of the present work, Ib was a successful teacher on the brink of her thirties. It was the fourth painting she sat for, and was followed by the large-scale canvases Ib and her Husband (1992) and Ib Reading (1997). Sitting for Freud, she explains, was ‘a way of having a relationship with my dad’. She sees ‘each picture as representing a period in my life. It is more than a snapshot—[it] is a substantial enough period to have had to see how you felt that time, your state of mind, your concerns and what you were going through encapsulated’ (I. Boyt, quoted in J. Auerbach and W. Feaver, Sitting for Freud, BBC 2004). In her commentary on the present work, Catherine Lampert notes that ‘Here, her head fills the frame, and partly because she is more awake than in other paintings, drawings and etchings where she is the subject, in the present portrait she seems able to silently share her inner life with her father’ (C. Lampert and T. Treves, Lucian Freud: Catalogue Raisonné of the Oil Paintings, Vol. 4, London 2025, p. 26).
While the lessons of the Old Masters continued to run deep in Freud’s blood, his practice evolved in bold new directions as he approached his seventieth birthday. The 1990s saw the advent of Leigh Bowery and the ‘benefits supervisor’ Sue Tilley, their voluptuous forms precipitating ever-more complex brushwork. His palettes became increasingly sophisticated, with new colours mixed for each stroke; his textures became thicker and more pliable, each gesture alive with the visceral properties of flesh. In the intimate portrait heads of this period—including the magnificent Leigh Bowery (1991, Tate, London), Kai (1991-1992) and Esther (1992), as well as the present work—these developments were placed under a magnifying lens. Ib’s skin is layered with strokes of mauve and gold, and animated by near-sculptural painterly textures. Her hair tumbles in loose, abstract waves, ribboned with fluid strands of russet and ochre. Words strain at her lips and flicker behind her eyes, every inch of her face riddled with untold expression.
The early 1990s was also a time of unprecedented professional triumph for Freud. Following his major touring retrospective of 1987, which saw the critic Robert Hughes name him the ‘greatest living realist painter’, the artist entered a new partnership with the American gallerist William Acquavella in 1992. The relationship would propel his reputation onto the global stage. His Whitechapel Gallery show the following year, which went on to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, became an international sensation, with critics labelling it the ‘hottest ticket in town’ and one newspaper comparing Freud’s fame to that of Madonna (P. Hoban, Lucian Freud: Eyes Wide Open, London 2014, p. 132). Amid the extravagant new canvases that dominated the exhibition, however, the present work stood as a quiet reminder of the values that lay at the core of his art. In the smallest of painted gestures, Freud seals his daughter’s living, breathing presence on canvas, capturing—and, in doing so, strengthening—the unique bond between them.
Tender and intimate, Ib (1990) is a jewel-like portrait of Lucian Freud’s daughter Isobel Boyt. Her features are sculpted from thick impasto, marbled with rich tones of ivory, peach, bronze and umber. Freud captures the delicate flush of her cheeks and the play of light across her brow, his brushwork alive with the newfound expressive freedom that came to define his works of the 1990s. Ib was the third of four children that Freud shared with his former lover and muse Suzy Boyt. She became one of his most treasured subjects and sat for a total of six major paintings—two of which are held in museum collections—as well as a further unfinished portrait. A successor to the 1983-1984 masterpiece of the same title, the present example belongs to the celebrated body of portrait heads that flourished at the height of Freud’s powers. It featured in his landmark touring exhibition at the Whitechapel Gallery, London in 1993, as well as his major retrospective at Tate Britain, London in 2002.
As Freud’s celebrity and ambition reached new heights throughout the 1980s, he found himself drawn increasingly back to his family. His relationships with his adult children grew stronger and deeper over hours in the studio, often making up for years of childhood absence. Suzy Boyt had met Freud while studying at the Slade School of Art during the 1950s, and sat for the pivotal portrait Woman Smiling (1958-1959). Ib, born in 1961, featured as a seven-year-old in the 1968-1969 masterwork Large Interior, Paddington (Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid). Following a wild escapade to Trinidad with their mother, the Boyt siblings reconnected with their father during adolescence, with Ib sitting for a full-length portrait now held in the Cleveland Art Museum, Ohio. Other offspring—including Bella and Esther Freud, daughters of Bernardine Coverley—would also feature with increasing intensity throughout the 1970s and 1980s. ‘If you’re not there when they are in the nest you can be more there later’, said Freud (L. Freud, quoted in W. Feaver, Lucian Freud, London 2002, p. 20).
By the time of the present work, Ib was a successful teacher on the brink of her thirties. It was the fourth painting she sat for, and was followed by the large-scale canvases Ib and her Husband (1992) and Ib Reading (1997). Sitting for Freud, she explains, was ‘a way of having a relationship with my dad’. She sees ‘each picture as representing a period in my life. It is more than a snapshot—[it] is a substantial enough period to have had to see how you felt that time, your state of mind, your concerns and what you were going through encapsulated’ (I. Boyt, quoted in J. Auerbach and W. Feaver, Sitting for Freud, BBC 2004). In her commentary on the present work, Catherine Lampert notes that ‘Here, her head fills the frame, and partly because she is more awake than in other paintings, drawings and etchings where she is the subject, in the present portrait she seems able to silently share her inner life with her father’ (C. Lampert and T. Treves, Lucian Freud: Catalogue Raisonné of the Oil Paintings, Vol. 4, London 2025, p. 26).
While the lessons of the Old Masters continued to run deep in Freud’s blood, his practice evolved in bold new directions as he approached his seventieth birthday. The 1990s saw the advent of Leigh Bowery and the ‘benefits supervisor’ Sue Tilley, their voluptuous forms precipitating ever-more complex brushwork. His palettes became increasingly sophisticated, with new colours mixed for each stroke; his textures became thicker and more pliable, each gesture alive with the visceral properties of flesh. In the intimate portrait heads of this period—including the magnificent Leigh Bowery (1991, Tate, London), Kai (1991-1992) and Esther (1992), as well as the present work—these developments were placed under a magnifying lens. Ib’s skin is layered with strokes of mauve and gold, and animated by near-sculptural painterly textures. Her hair tumbles in loose, abstract waves, ribboned with fluid strands of russet and ochre. Words strain at her lips and flicker behind her eyes, every inch of her face riddled with untold expression.
The early 1990s was also a time of unprecedented professional triumph for Freud. Following his major touring retrospective of 1987, which saw the critic Robert Hughes name him the ‘greatest living realist painter’, the artist entered a new partnership with the American gallerist William Acquavella in 1992. The relationship would propel his reputation onto the global stage. His Whitechapel Gallery show the following year, which went on to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, became an international sensation, with critics labelling it the ‘hottest ticket in town’ and one newspaper comparing Freud’s fame to that of Madonna (P. Hoban, Lucian Freud: Eyes Wide Open, London 2014, p. 132). Amid the extravagant new canvases that dominated the exhibition, however, the present work stood as a quiet reminder of the values that lay at the core of his art. In the smallest of painted gestures, Freud seals his daughter’s living, breathing presence on canvas, capturing—and, in doing so, strengthening—the unique bond between them.