.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
拍品专文
Painted in 1896, Meule et vaches dans le pré à Eragny, soleil couchant captures the warm glow of the late afternoon sun across the meadows surrounding Camille Pissarro’s home at Eragny-sur-Epte, signaling the quiet close of a summer day’s labors in the fields. A rural hamlet located in the Vexin region on the border of Normandy and roughly two hours north of Paris by train, Eragny and its surrounding environs became one of Pissarro’s most enduring subjects from 1884, when he and his family moved to the village, until the end of his life. Over the course of the following two decades, the artist produced one of the largest and most significant bodies of landscape painting in his oeuvre there, devoting himself to capturing the countryside and its inhabitants through shifting light at varying times of day and the seasonal rhythms of rural life.
In 1884, after thirteen years living on the outskirts of Paris in Pontoise, Pissarro sought a change of scenery, desiring a more modest setting in the countryside in which to paint and raise his children. He found it in Eragny, a town of fewer than five hundred inhabitants nestled along the banks of the Epte River, whose surrounding fields would become the subject of many of his most celebrated landscapes. Pissarro described his enthusiasm in a letter to his son Lucien that year: “Yes, we’ve made up our minds on Eragny -sur-Epte. The house is superb and not expensive; a thousand francs, with a garden and meadows. It is two hours from Paris. I found the region much more beautiful than Compiègne. Gisors is superb; we’d seen nothing” (quoted in J. Pissarro and C. Durand-Ruel Snollaerts, Camille Pissarro: Catalogue critique des peintures, 2005, vol. I, p. 499). Renting the property for their first eight years, Pissarro and his family purchased the house in 1892—with the help of his friend Claude Monet, who lived in nearby Giverny—establishing what would become the artist’s permanent home for the remainder of his life.
The paintings Pissarro executed at Eragny during the 1890s reflect the mature synthesis of Impressionist observation and the chromatic lessons that he absorbed during his engagement with Neo-Impressionism in the late 1880s. Between 1885 and 1890, the veteran artist surprised many of his fellow Impressionists by embracing the principles of Neo-Impressionism after meeting the younger painters Paul Signac and Georges Seurat, both proponents of the movement. Intrigued by their divisionist theories of color, Pissarro experimented extensively with the method, separating pigments into small-scale touches intended to achieve a heightened optical brilliance, and standing alone among his Impressionist peers in advocating the new style to the dealer Paul Durand-Ruel.
Yet, the highly systematic application of paint soon proved increasingly laborious and restrictive for the artist, who was always an Impressionist at heart. By the early 1890s Pissarro had begun to move away from strict Pointillism, asking himself “what to do to have the purity and simplicity of dots as well as the full-bodied, supple, free, spontaneous and fresh feel of our impressionist art?” (quoted in Correspondance de Camille Pissarro, Paris, 1980, vol II, p. 251).
Pissarro was devoted to searching, a stranger to any kind of formula, ever ready to evolve. He never wanted to stop his explorations, he never hesitated to reinvent himself to the point of changing his style. In this, he proved the boldest of the Impressionists. Anka Muhlstein
This reevaluation marked a decisive shift in the artist’s facture. By the time Pissarro painted the present work, he had succeeded in reconciling the chromatic clarity of Pointillism with the freedom and immediacy that had characterized his earlier Impressionist practice. In the present work, this synthesis is immediately apparent. The surface of the canvas is dappled with small, staccato strokes of color that form a cohesive mosaic. Rather than dissolving the image into the rigid points of the pointillist technique, Pissarro deployed these touches with greater flexibility, allowing warm ochres, greens, and russet tones to interlock across the landscape to create a composition both intricate in detail and harmonious in handling. The resulting surface retains the luminosity of pointillist color while restoring the spontaneity and observational immediacy that lie at the heart of Impressionism.
He has succeeded in making the true brightness of dawns, middays, and sunsets stream through his landscapes... truly, the canvases of Pissarro are today painted with the sun. Albert Aurier
Although Pissarro would return to Rouen in the late summer months following the execution of this work, eager to apply this renewed technique to cosmopolitan subjects, the landscapes he painted at Eragny during this period proved equally successful. In a letter to Lucien dated 3 September 1896, Pissarro reported that he had sold this painting, along with three other Eragny canvases, to the Galerie Durand-Ruel, confirming both his confidence in his evolving technique and the enduring appeal of the rural scenes that had long defined his art (quoted in J. Pissarro and C. Durand-Ruel Snollaerts, op. cit., 2005, p. 715).
In 1884, after thirteen years living on the outskirts of Paris in Pontoise, Pissarro sought a change of scenery, desiring a more modest setting in the countryside in which to paint and raise his children. He found it in Eragny, a town of fewer than five hundred inhabitants nestled along the banks of the Epte River, whose surrounding fields would become the subject of many of his most celebrated landscapes. Pissarro described his enthusiasm in a letter to his son Lucien that year: “Yes, we’ve made up our minds on Eragny -sur-Epte. The house is superb and not expensive; a thousand francs, with a garden and meadows. It is two hours from Paris. I found the region much more beautiful than Compiègne. Gisors is superb; we’d seen nothing” (quoted in J. Pissarro and C. Durand-Ruel Snollaerts, Camille Pissarro: Catalogue critique des peintures, 2005, vol. I, p. 499). Renting the property for their first eight years, Pissarro and his family purchased the house in 1892—with the help of his friend Claude Monet, who lived in nearby Giverny—establishing what would become the artist’s permanent home for the remainder of his life.
The paintings Pissarro executed at Eragny during the 1890s reflect the mature synthesis of Impressionist observation and the chromatic lessons that he absorbed during his engagement with Neo-Impressionism in the late 1880s. Between 1885 and 1890, the veteran artist surprised many of his fellow Impressionists by embracing the principles of Neo-Impressionism after meeting the younger painters Paul Signac and Georges Seurat, both proponents of the movement. Intrigued by their divisionist theories of color, Pissarro experimented extensively with the method, separating pigments into small-scale touches intended to achieve a heightened optical brilliance, and standing alone among his Impressionist peers in advocating the new style to the dealer Paul Durand-Ruel.
Yet, the highly systematic application of paint soon proved increasingly laborious and restrictive for the artist, who was always an Impressionist at heart. By the early 1890s Pissarro had begun to move away from strict Pointillism, asking himself “what to do to have the purity and simplicity of dots as well as the full-bodied, supple, free, spontaneous and fresh feel of our impressionist art?” (quoted in Correspondance de Camille Pissarro, Paris, 1980, vol II, p. 251).
Pissarro was devoted to searching, a stranger to any kind of formula, ever ready to evolve. He never wanted to stop his explorations, he never hesitated to reinvent himself to the point of changing his style. In this, he proved the boldest of the Impressionists. Anka Muhlstein
This reevaluation marked a decisive shift in the artist’s facture. By the time Pissarro painted the present work, he had succeeded in reconciling the chromatic clarity of Pointillism with the freedom and immediacy that had characterized his earlier Impressionist practice. In the present work, this synthesis is immediately apparent. The surface of the canvas is dappled with small, staccato strokes of color that form a cohesive mosaic. Rather than dissolving the image into the rigid points of the pointillist technique, Pissarro deployed these touches with greater flexibility, allowing warm ochres, greens, and russet tones to interlock across the landscape to create a composition both intricate in detail and harmonious in handling. The resulting surface retains the luminosity of pointillist color while restoring the spontaneity and observational immediacy that lie at the heart of Impressionism.
He has succeeded in making the true brightness of dawns, middays, and sunsets stream through his landscapes... truly, the canvases of Pissarro are today painted with the sun. Albert Aurier
Although Pissarro would return to Rouen in the late summer months following the execution of this work, eager to apply this renewed technique to cosmopolitan subjects, the landscapes he painted at Eragny during this period proved equally successful. In a letter to Lucien dated 3 September 1896, Pissarro reported that he had sold this painting, along with three other Eragny canvases, to the Galerie Durand-Ruel, confirming both his confidence in his evolving technique and the enduring appeal of the rural scenes that had long defined his art (quoted in J. Pissarro and C. Durand-Ruel Snollaerts, op. cit., 2005, p. 715).