.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
拍品专文
This animated bronze gamecock ranks among the most accomplished surviving zoomorphic metalworks from the eastern Islamic world. Conceived as an incense burner but executed with uncommon sculptural sophistication, it occupies an important position within the development of animal-shaped incense vessels in Greater Iran.
The sculptor achieved an unusual sense of animation through a series of subtle interventions resulting in a lively naturalism rarely encountered in surviving eastern Islamic bronzes. Although the body remains stable and compact, vivacity is channeled into its outstretched neck and head; its head is alert, its eyes and beak sharp. The beak is fractionally open, while the elaborate comb adds a further note of flamboyance. Above all, though, this was a practical object - an incense burner whose function is evident externally and internally. The incense smoke is allowed out through rows of eight-petal rosette piercings on the lower body and neck, as well as the mouth. Inside the belly a small metal bowl held the incense, accessed by sliding one of the wings upwards. This was a highly unusual arrangement demonstrating that here practicality was secondary to the sculptor's aesthetic.
The greater emphasis on naturalism and vivacity of our incense burner shares more with a distinct group of Early Abbasid bronze birds attributed to Iraq and Egypt (for example see a rooster in the Lavra Monastery, Mount Athos and another in San Isidoro in León, Spain). These western Abbasid birds appear to have served no practical function and are purely sculptural. Nevertheless, they share with the present gamecock a similarly conveyed vitality. Beyond their stylistic significance, these comparisons help establish the chronological position of the present piece. The manner in which animation is achieved recalls the Abbasid bronzes of the late 8th and 9th centuries, yet the gamecock also anticipates later Iranian incense burners. It occupies an intermediary position between the naturalistic Abbasid birds and the increasingly stylised incense vessels of the Seljuq period. The unusual wing-access mechanism likewise suggests an early experimental stage before the introduction of more practical solutions seen on later examples.
Unlike the naturalistically modelled domestic cocks of the Abbasid tradition, our bird's lean body, upright posture, oval eye, reduced wattles, distinctive comb suggest that the sculptor was portraying an Asil (Aseel) gamecock. This creature originated in the Indian subcontinent, but spread westwards several millennia ago, and remains a favoured bird for cockfighting in Afghanistan and, even though illegal, in Iran. The sculptor has admirably captured both the Asil's form and uncompromising character. A further distinctive detail captured by the sculptor is the oval eye, incised below, which captures the oval eyering and typical soft stretchy flesh below the eyes found on some Asil birds. But the craftsman was not aiming at the sort of naturalism aspired to by the maker of the Mount Athos rooster. Instead he was creating a practical object that necessitated openwork for the incense smoke to rise through. He has achieved this by piercing neck and body with a highly decorative design — a half-drop repeat of ajouré rosettes. The result is a work that maintains a fine tension between realism and decoration.
From Greater Iran the closest published comparisons are three rooster-shaped incense burners. The first is in the Aga Khan Museum, Toronto (AKM602); the second in the Khalili Collection (MTW823); and the third in the Hermitage Museum (Loukonine and Ivanov, Lost treasures of Persia: Persian Art in the Hermitage Museum, Washington D.C., 1996, cat.no.103, p.125). All appear to be later than the present work and reveal progressively more utilitarian solutions to the problem of accessing the incense chamber. The Khalili rooster employs a hinged neck that folds forward to expose the interior, while the Aga Khan example utilizes a filling aperture in the back closed by a peacock-shaped stopper. Both solutions are mechanically more convenient than the present lot, yet aesthetically less integrated. They reflect a broader evolution from naturalism towards functionality. The present incense burner preserves an earlier stage in that development, when technical ingenuity remained subordinate to artistic effect.
Further evidence is provided by the kufic inscription arranged on a band above the breast. Its placement closely parallels inscriptional panels found on several Abbasid bronze birds and related animal sculptures. The script itself, however, appears later than the rounded kufic associated with those works. It incorporates angular letter forms, oblique strokes and early ornamental flourishes characteristic of developments that became widespread during the 10th century. At the same time, it lacks the elaborate floriated extensions, angled terminals and highly decorative treatments common in 10th and 11th-century monumental and metalwork inscriptions. The inscription therefore occupies a transitional stage that is most comfortably placed in the 9th or 10th century.
A useful point of comparison is provided by the celebrated bronze feline incense burner excavated at Hulbuk in present-day Tajikistan, which is generally dated to the mid 11th century (Loukonine and Ivanov, op.cit., cat.100, p.122, 124). The sophisticated and highly embellished kufic inscription on that piece represents a significantly later stage of epigraphic development than the comparatively restrained script found on the present rooster. The difference suggests a chronological gap of at least several generations and supports a substantially earlier date for the rooster. More broadly, the object belongs to a moment before the widespread popularity of feline incense burners in eastern Islamic lands. During the 11th and 12th centuries, large zoomorphic burners increasingly took the form of lions or, more probably, hunting caracals. Their stability and suitability for openwork construction rendered birds less attractive as models. The present gamecock therefore appears to precede this shift in taste.
Taken together, the sculptural treatment, concealed incense mechanism, inscriptional evidence, and relationship to both Abbasid animal bronzes and later Iranian incense burners strongly support a date in the 9th or 10th century. The gamecock thus stands as the earliest known avian incense burner from Greater Iran and one of the earliest surviving Islamic animal-shaped incense burners, occupying a pivotal position in the history of medieval Islamic bronze casting.
We are grateful to Julian Raby for his assistance in the writing of this note.
The sculptor achieved an unusual sense of animation through a series of subtle interventions resulting in a lively naturalism rarely encountered in surviving eastern Islamic bronzes. Although the body remains stable and compact, vivacity is channeled into its outstretched neck and head; its head is alert, its eyes and beak sharp. The beak is fractionally open, while the elaborate comb adds a further note of flamboyance. Above all, though, this was a practical object - an incense burner whose function is evident externally and internally. The incense smoke is allowed out through rows of eight-petal rosette piercings on the lower body and neck, as well as the mouth. Inside the belly a small metal bowl held the incense, accessed by sliding one of the wings upwards. This was a highly unusual arrangement demonstrating that here practicality was secondary to the sculptor's aesthetic.
The greater emphasis on naturalism and vivacity of our incense burner shares more with a distinct group of Early Abbasid bronze birds attributed to Iraq and Egypt (for example see a rooster in the Lavra Monastery, Mount Athos and another in San Isidoro in León, Spain). These western Abbasid birds appear to have served no practical function and are purely sculptural. Nevertheless, they share with the present gamecock a similarly conveyed vitality. Beyond their stylistic significance, these comparisons help establish the chronological position of the present piece. The manner in which animation is achieved recalls the Abbasid bronzes of the late 8th and 9th centuries, yet the gamecock also anticipates later Iranian incense burners. It occupies an intermediary position between the naturalistic Abbasid birds and the increasingly stylised incense vessels of the Seljuq period. The unusual wing-access mechanism likewise suggests an early experimental stage before the introduction of more practical solutions seen on later examples.
Unlike the naturalistically modelled domestic cocks of the Abbasid tradition, our bird's lean body, upright posture, oval eye, reduced wattles, distinctive comb suggest that the sculptor was portraying an Asil (Aseel) gamecock. This creature originated in the Indian subcontinent, but spread westwards several millennia ago, and remains a favoured bird for cockfighting in Afghanistan and, even though illegal, in Iran. The sculptor has admirably captured both the Asil's form and uncompromising character. A further distinctive detail captured by the sculptor is the oval eye, incised below, which captures the oval eyering and typical soft stretchy flesh below the eyes found on some Asil birds. But the craftsman was not aiming at the sort of naturalism aspired to by the maker of the Mount Athos rooster. Instead he was creating a practical object that necessitated openwork for the incense smoke to rise through. He has achieved this by piercing neck and body with a highly decorative design — a half-drop repeat of ajouré rosettes. The result is a work that maintains a fine tension between realism and decoration.
From Greater Iran the closest published comparisons are three rooster-shaped incense burners. The first is in the Aga Khan Museum, Toronto (AKM602); the second in the Khalili Collection (MTW823); and the third in the Hermitage Museum (Loukonine and Ivanov, Lost treasures of Persia: Persian Art in the Hermitage Museum, Washington D.C., 1996, cat.no.103, p.125). All appear to be later than the present work and reveal progressively more utilitarian solutions to the problem of accessing the incense chamber. The Khalili rooster employs a hinged neck that folds forward to expose the interior, while the Aga Khan example utilizes a filling aperture in the back closed by a peacock-shaped stopper. Both solutions are mechanically more convenient than the present lot, yet aesthetically less integrated. They reflect a broader evolution from naturalism towards functionality. The present incense burner preserves an earlier stage in that development, when technical ingenuity remained subordinate to artistic effect.
Further evidence is provided by the kufic inscription arranged on a band above the breast. Its placement closely parallels inscriptional panels found on several Abbasid bronze birds and related animal sculptures. The script itself, however, appears later than the rounded kufic associated with those works. It incorporates angular letter forms, oblique strokes and early ornamental flourishes characteristic of developments that became widespread during the 10th century. At the same time, it lacks the elaborate floriated extensions, angled terminals and highly decorative treatments common in 10th and 11th-century monumental and metalwork inscriptions. The inscription therefore occupies a transitional stage that is most comfortably placed in the 9th or 10th century.
A useful point of comparison is provided by the celebrated bronze feline incense burner excavated at Hulbuk in present-day Tajikistan, which is generally dated to the mid 11th century (Loukonine and Ivanov, op.cit., cat.100, p.122, 124). The sophisticated and highly embellished kufic inscription on that piece represents a significantly later stage of epigraphic development than the comparatively restrained script found on the present rooster. The difference suggests a chronological gap of at least several generations and supports a substantially earlier date for the rooster. More broadly, the object belongs to a moment before the widespread popularity of feline incense burners in eastern Islamic lands. During the 11th and 12th centuries, large zoomorphic burners increasingly took the form of lions or, more probably, hunting caracals. Their stability and suitability for openwork construction rendered birds less attractive as models. The present gamecock therefore appears to precede this shift in taste.
Taken together, the sculptural treatment, concealed incense mechanism, inscriptional evidence, and relationship to both Abbasid animal bronzes and later Iranian incense burners strongly support a date in the 9th or 10th century. The gamecock thus stands as the earliest known avian incense burner from Greater Iran and one of the earliest surviving Islamic animal-shaped incense burners, occupying a pivotal position in the history of medieval Islamic bronze casting.
We are grateful to Julian Raby for his assistance in the writing of this note.