Lot Content

Global notice COVID-19 Important notice
Lee Krasner (1908-1984)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more The Defining Gesture: Modern Masters from the Eppler Family Collection
Lee Krasner (1908-1984)

Shattered Light

Lee Krasner (1908-1984)
Shattered Light
signed twice and dated 'Lee Krasner KRASNER 1954' (on the reverse)
oil and paper collage on Masonite
34 x 48 in. (86.4 x 121.9 cm.)
Executed in 1954.
Estate of Lee Krasner
Robert Miller Gallery, New York
Acquired from the above by the present owner, 1986
W. Zimmer, "Of Interest," New York Times, 17 October 1986, p. C28.
J. Bell, "New York Reviews—Lee Krasner: Robert Miller," ARTnews, March 1987, p. 147.
Abstract Expressionism: The Critical Developments, exh. cat., Buffalo, Albright-Knox Art Gallery, 1987, p. 86, fig. 7 (illustrated).
S. Naifeh and G. W. Smith, Jackson Pollock: An American Saga, New York, 1989, p. 898.
R. Hobbs, Lee Krasner, New York, 1993, pp. 56-57, fig. 47 (illustrated).
E. G. Landau, Lee Krasner: A Catalogue Raisonné, New York, 1995, pp. 139-140, no. 278 (illustrated in color).
New York, Stable Gallery, Lee Krasner Collages, September-October 1955.
East Hampton, Signa Gallery, Lee Kranser: Paintings 1947-59, July-August 1959.
London, Whitechapel Art Gallery, Lee Krasner: Paintings, Drawings and Collages, September-October 1965, p. 25, no. 72.
Mexico City, embassy of the United States, Art in Embassies, organized by the Museum of Modern Art, New York, February 1968-August 1969.
Peoria, Lakewood Center for the Arts and Sciences, American Women: 20th Century, September-October 1972, p. 51, no. 46 (illustrated).
Washington D.C., Corcoran Gallery of Art; University Park, Museum of Art, Pennsylvania State University; Waltham, Rose Art Museum, Brandeis University, Lee Krasner: Collages and Works on Paper 1933-1974, January-October 1975, p. 17, no. 44.
Basel, Galerie Beyeler, Autres Dimensions, June-September 1976, n.p., no. 36.
Houston, Museum of Fine Arts; San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; Norfolk, Chrysler Museum; Phoenix Art Museum; New York, Museum of Modern Art, Lee Krasner: A Retrospective, November 1983-February 1985, pp. 82-84, fig. 81 (illustrated).
New York, Robert Miller Gallery, Lee Krasner Collages, October-November 1986, n.p. (illustrated inverted in color).
Special Notice

On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee.

Where Christie's has provided a Minimum Price Guarantee it is at risk of making a loss, which can be significant, if the lot fails to sell. Christie's therefore sometimes chooses to share that risk with a third party. In such cases the third party agrees prior to the auction to place an irrevocable written bid on the lot. The third party is therefore committed to bidding on the lot and, even if there are no other bids, buying the lot at the level of the written bid unless there are any higher bids. In doing so, the third party takes on all or part of the risk of the lot not being sold. If the lot is not sold, the third party may incur a loss. In most cases, Christie’s compensates the third party in exchange for accepting this risk with remuneration based on a fixed fee if the third party is the successful bidder or, if the third party is not the successful bidder, either a fixed fee or an amount calculated against the lot’s hammer price. The third party may also bid for the lot above the written bid. Where the third party is the successful bidder, Christie’s will report the final purchase price net of the fixed financing fee for taking on the guarantee risk.

Third party guarantors are required by us to disclose to anyone they are advising their financial interest in any lots they are guaranteeing. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, if you are advised by or bidding through an agent on a lot identified as being subject to a third party guarantee you should always ask your agent to confirm whether or not he or she has a financial interest in relation to the lot. This is a lot where Christie’s holds a direct financial guarantee interest that is backed by a third party’s irrevocable bid.

Brought to you by

Sara Friedlander
Sara Friedlander

Lot Essay

“Shattered Light is another example of Krasner’s efforts to integrate her present and past. Here the collaged elements (again, remnants of her destroyed drawings) are woven into a work in which the paint itself resembles shards. Shattered Light may thus be interpreted as dealing with destruction. Interspersed throughout the work are egg forms, both broken and whole, which may relate to the iconography of Gorky’s Liver Is the Cock’s Comb, in which he combined allusions to eggs, feathers, and viscera as evocations of the modern soul.”
—Robert Hobbs

Executed in 1954, Lee Krasner’s Shattered Light marks a milestone in the development of both painting and collage. Vibrant energy pulses throughout as colorful shreds of paper and quick strokes of oil paint push and pull the composition, creating a spatial tension so skillful that it could have only come from Krasner’s hand. Swaths of white, blue, and varying earthy brown hues swirl around each other, punctuated by spots of red and yellow, all of which continually overlap to create the kind of all-over composition that came to be synonymous with the Abstract Expressionist movement to which Krasner belongs.

Nature was a primary subject matter for Krasner throughout the course of her career, beginning as early as her student days at both Cooper Union and the National Academy, and Shattered Light maintains that proclivity. Here, paint and collage coalesce to produce poetic naturalistic forms that recall the feeling of sweeping wind barreling through the air. Yet these indications of nature are not only relegated to the forms themselves, but are corroborated by her choice of title. The idea of “shattered light” not only conjures up the idea of natural forms merely from its usage of the term light, a natural phenomenon, but the phrase itself recalls beams of light breaking through trees in a forest.

Both the titles and the depictions which occur in the final work are not immediately known to Krasner at the outset. Instead, she begins with a gesture, and uses that as a jumping off point to create a more fully complete canvas. As she says, “I make the first gesture, then other gestures occur, then observation. Something in the abstract movement suggests a form. I’m often astonished at what I’m confronted with when the major part comes through. Then I just go along with it; it’s either organic in content, or quite abstract, but there’s no forced decision. I want to get myself something via the act of painting…I sustain my interest in it through spontaneity” (L. Krasner, quoted in M. Tucker, Lee Krasner: Large Paintings, exh. cat., Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 1973, n.p). The beauty of Krasner’s work lies in part in her utter expertise in handling her spontaneous impulses; there is a physicality to the gestures she creates that illustrate an internal lyrical rhythm that is both striking and entirely her own.

The naming of Krasner’s paintings, in a similar fashion to that of her husband, Jackson Pollock, was a process that came after the work was completed and was often quite collaborative. Krasner often turned to art dealer John Bernard Myers to aid her in this process. Recalling this activity, Myers said, “She took a keen interest in how she titled her pictures, but like many artists she sometimes ran out of ideas as to what to call what. ‘Come for dinner,’ she would say, ‘I’ve some new things I want you to see. And I knew we would be having a delicious and hilarious conversation about naming the latest work’” (J.B. Myers, “Naming Pictures: Conversations between Lee Krasner and John Bernard Myers,” ArtForum, November 1984, p. 69).

In the mid-twentieth century, the cultural tides shifted as the uniquely American school of Abstract Expressionism eclipsed the popular, but stagnant, Parisian aesthetic. Krasner found herself on the crest of a great wave that would demolish and rebuild the common understanding of what art was supposed to do, and how it could do it. However, unlike many of her peers, who fashioned themselves as romantic iconoclasts or misanthropic outcasts, Krasner adopted an approach to art-making devoid of ego, in that it was essentially opposed to objectified individuality. While so many Abstract Expressionists would eventually develop a signature style, inevitably becoming static and predictable, Krasner remained committed throughout her artistic career to exploration, permutation and pure freedom.

Emblematic of this commitment is the artist’s recollection of how she began making collage: “It started in 1953—I had the studio hung solidly with drawings... floor to ceiling all around. Walked in one day, hated it all, took it down, tore everything and threw it on the floor, and when I went back—it was a couple of weeks before I opened that door again—it was seemingly a very destructive act. I don’t know why I did it, except I certainly did it. When I opened that door and walked in, the floor was solidly covered with these torn drawings that I had left and they began to interest me and I started collaging. Well, it started with drawings. Then I took my canvases and cut and began doing the same thing, and that ended in my collage show in 1955” (L. Krasner quoted in B. Diamonstein, Inside New York’s Art World, New York, 1979, p. 205).

Moreover, the use of collage is the culmination of numerous influences throughout her artistic career. On the one hand, her time studying with famed artist Hans Hofmann plays a crucial role, who taught his students much about Cubism, and Picasso in particular, who championed the use of collage and was one of the biggest influences on Krasner’s art. On the other, the choice can be traced back to her time working for the WPA, where she had first used the technique. Regardless of why exactly Krasner turned to this practice, it allowed her to combine the two poles of Abstract Expressionism: the energetic physicality of action painting with the optical vibrancy of color-field painting.

Although Lee Krasner’s career has historically been overshadowed by that of her more famous husband, the decades since Pollock’s death have revealed Krasner as a tour de force behind the New York School of painting that dominated Post-War American art. Speaking of her art, curator Robert Hobbs has said, “In her art, Krasner dramatizes a change of enormous import as she moves from the monolithic definition of individual identity evident in the single-image compositions prevalent in the mature works of many Abstract Expressionists toward a more open-ended perception of the self as a dynamic constellation of forces” (R. Hobbs, “Lee Krasner,” Lee Krasner, exh. cat., Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1999, p. 28).

More from Post-War & Contemporary Art Evening Sale

View All
View All