Lot Content

Global notice COVID-19 Important notice
Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more The Defining Gesture: Modern Masters from the Eppler Family CollectionAcross their more than sixty years together, Heinz and Ruthe Eppler were devoted partners in family, philanthropy, and a shared love of art and culture. Born in Germany, Heinz Eppler (d. 2012) escaped the looming Nazi threat to begin a new life in the United States. With great business acumen, Heinz co-founded a housewares distributing business that later acquired The Miller-Wohl Company, and built the firm into a national chain. At the same time, the Epplers created a lasting legacy in art, education, healthcare, and Jewish causes. As president and chair of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Heinz provided a strength of leadership that impacted countless lives around the globe, notably in Jewish communities in Central and Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union, and Ethiopia. The Epplers’ philanthropic focus also extended to the arts. The Epplers decided to build their own collection in the early 1980s, and began a friendship with Edward B. Henning (d. 1993), the Cleveland Museum of Art’s Chief Curator of Modern Art. The many correspondences between Henning and Heinz Eppler, often funny and personal, reveal an ongoing dialogue on family, the history of art, and the evolution of the Eppler Family Collection. Henning became a trusted advisor, relating his enthusiasm or hesitation on potential acquisitions. “Once again, let me simply state that when I see things that I think are very good I will mention them to you,” Henning wrote in 1981, “and depend on you to see whatever you think might be of interest to you.” The Epplers, for their part, were inquisitive and deliberate in their purchases. “Ruthe and I are very patient collectors,” Heinz Eppler explained to Henning in 1982, “and are not impulsive with respect to acquiring a specific rare work from an existing collection.” Rather than following the heady Contemporary fashions of the art world in the eighties, the Epplers turned to the artists that had spoken to them more directly in their formative adult years. What motivated the Epplers was the thrill of finding works of visual and intellectual resonance—paintings, sculpture, and works on paper by such legendary figures of Modernism as Franz Kline, Hans Hofmann, Lee Krasner, Arshile Gorky, David Smith, Milton Avery, Pablo Picasso, and Henri Matisse. Like Heinz, many of the artists were also émigrés who found their voice and freedom in America. Throughout the 1980’s, Henning was not only an important advisor, but he and the Epplers developed a close friendship and a shared vision about collecting “When you have an important collection, no matter how large or small,” the curator wrote, “it is a serious responsibility as well as a great pleasure.” Of Motherwell’s Je t’aime No. III with Loaf of Bread, he noted, “My feeling is that it is very important as well as being beautiful,” and he lauded the collectors for having chosen a “superb” painting by William Baziotes. Henning went to great lengths to commend the art historical significance of Abstract Expressionists such as Motherwell, Franz Kline, and Jackson Pollock. Upon hearing that the Epplers had purchased Kline’s Light Mechanic in 1985—a work Henning had suggested some two years earlier—the curator wrote to express his congratulations. “You now have an excellent, representative collection of American Abstract Expressionist art,” he enthused, “and that is the most important art of the twentieth century and the most important of all American art.” The Epplers’ connection with Henning is indicative of their personal, heartfelt approach toward art—one that culminated in an inspired collection of works extending across the twentieth century. As Henning observed to the couple in December 1986: “For the past four years, each year I have thought that your collecting might be coming to a conclusion, and each year I’m surprised when we find something important.” Ultimately, the Epplers collected art that they loved to live with and share with others, both through loans to exhibitions and by opening their home to museum groups and fellow collectors. In 1986, the Epplers were asked to loan works to the Cleveland Museum exhibition The Art of Collecting Modern Art: An Exhibition of Works from the Collections of Clevelanders. As Henning wrote, “Collecting art intelligently involves much more than having enough money. Collecting art successfully requires knowledge, taste and judgment. It may not require the same skills used to create works of art, but it does depend on a comparable level of taste and judgment.” The Eppler Family Collection is an enduring testament to the personal vision and discernment with which Heinz and Ruthe carefully built their collection.
Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)

Buste de femme au chapeau (Dora Maar)

Details
Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
Buste de femme au chapeau (Dora Maar)
signed ‘Picasso’ (upper left)
oil on canvas
28 7/8 x 23 5/8 in. (73.3 x 59.9 cm.)
Painted on 28 May 1943
Provenance
Galerie Louise Leiris (Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler), Paris.
Galerie Tarica, Paris.
Galleria Internazionale, Milan.
Davlyn Gallery, New York (by 1978).
Acquired from the above by the present owner, 18 January 1980.
Literature
C. Zervos, Pablo Picasso, Paris, 1962, vol. 13, no. 21 (illustrated, pl. 9).
Exhibited
The Cleveland Museum of Art, The Art of Collecting Modern Art An Exhibition of Works From Clevelanders, February-March 1986 (illustrated in color, fig. 3; titled Portrait de Femme).
Special Notice

On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee. This is a lot where Christie’s holds a direct financial guarantee interest.

Brought to you by

Max Carter
Max Carter

Lot Essay

The jaggedly angular and disjointed facial schematic in this Buste de femme au chapeau, cast in an austere, grisaille tonality, declares its wartime provenance. In a wicker chair, which has been assembled as if from steel coils and grating, sits Dora Maar, Picasso’s lover and muse. Grimly tight-lipped, defiant, and determined, she is all the more formidable and indestructible in the cut and welded metal Cubism in which Picasso appears to have constructed her upper body and head. Her angry, piercing gaze is that of a primitive, demonic idol, like one of the striated tribal masks that Picasso—as a much younger man, thirty-six years earlier—impressed upon the heads of the two women on the right-hand side in Les Demoiselles dAvignon.
The large, striking hat, as Brigitte Léal declared, is Dora’s “most provocative emblem... In its preciousness and fetishistic vocation, the feminine hat was, like the glove, an erotic accessory highly prized by the Surrealists. Thus Paul Eluard [declared], ‘A head must dare to wear a crown.’” Dora’s hats resemble the “great wings of a voracious insect” (Picasso and Portraiture, exh. cat., The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1996, pp. 387, 389 and 392). During the Second World War, her headwear often took on an especially belligerent aspect, appearing like the propellers of warplanes that could rain death from the skies, as the Germans had used them at Guernica in 1937, and in their Blitzkrieg defeat of France in 1940.
The deepening intimacy of Picasso’s liaison with Dora during the late 1930s coincided with the fascist uprising and ensuing Civil War in Spain. In fact, the entire history of their relationship was tragically and inescapably set against the backdrop of violence and war. Dora’s darkly intense, but inscrutably impassive countenance seemed to reflect the ominous and troubled mood in Europe during the years that preceded the Second World War. Picasso began to subject Dora’s visage in his paintings to unsparing savagery; like some mad surgeon he would take her features under his knife and, in the course of his experiments, contrive some shocking new pictorial identity for her. “After World War II broke out,” John Richardson has written, “Picasso came to portray Dora more and more frequently as a sacrificial victim, a tearful symbol of his own pain and grief at the horrors of tyranny and war” (“Pablo Picasso’s Femme au chapeau de paille,” Christie’s New York, sale catalogue, 4 May 2004, p. 113).
“It seems that Picasso could feel his emotions only through the intermediary of a mirror,” Brigitte Baer has explained. “He discovered his feelings in the mirror of other people’s faces, or at least what he projected there, even into those bodies at rest or convulsed—in short, through the intermediary of painting... He had another mirror, like himself somewhat inclined toward catastrophe: Dora Maar. She reacted intensely to all the news, followed it closely, and belonged to a relatively well-informed intellectual milieu. She was, like Picasso, melancholic and high strung. He had only to watch her reactions to know what his were, although hers were stronger and dramatized...whereas he, a Latin man who owed it to himself to be ‘macho’ in the good sense of the word, could not show his feelings” (Picasso and the War Years, exh. cat., Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, 1998, pp. 83, 85 and 86).
Living conditions in Paris became ever more harsh and difficult to bear during 1943 as the German Occupation was nearing the end of its third year. “One might describe this period as a long winter,” Baer has written. “This cold drove people into themselves, into a total silence... Curfew, glacial winter, and fear were the only items on the menu” (ibid., p. 85). Parisians had to deal with shortages of every kind, and each new year was sure to become a more trying ordeal than the one before.
While Picasso was permitted to paint, he had been forbidden to exhibit. His studio at 7, rue des Grands-Augustins, which he now made his wartime residence as well, had been subjected to a Gestapo search. Picasso also had to put up with unwelcome visits by German officers and ordinary soldiers who professed to an interest in art, even if Picasso’s painting had been officially condemned as “degenerate” according to aesthetic and ideological dictates of the Third Reich.
All sorts of rumors surfaced and spread about Picasso: he had been sent to concentration camp, he was working with the Resistance, or conversely the Germans were protecting the artist and even extending special treatment to him. Picasso soon discovered that he had perniciously hostile detractors among his fellow Parisians, who took advantage of the back-biting, scapegoat-seeking, and treacherous climate of the Occupation to cast aspersions on him and his art. In June 1942, the artist Vlaminck published an article in a collaborationist journal in which he blamed Picasso “for having led French painting into a deadly impasse, having led it into negation, helpless and finally to its death” (quoted in A. Baldassari, Picasso: Life with Dora Maar, Paris, 2006, p. 246).
By 1943, the German authorities had come to an agreement among themselves that Picasso, the creator of the anti-fascist mural Guernica, could be intimidated to keep him in line, but short of some major transgression on his part, he would not be touched. Doing harm to Picasso, then the world’s most famous living artist, would have handed the Allies a propaganda victory that the Nazi architects of the New Order in Europe could ill afford.
The most gripping wartime Doras date from the first four most desperate years of the war, between 1939 and 1943. In these dislocated faces and body configurations we read the intensity of Picasso’s own deepest fears and his most profound agony under the stress of events in real-time history, about which he, like everyone else, could obtain precious little information, and even less that might be credible. There is in this powerful Buste de femme of 28 May 1943 compelling evidence of Picasso’s strength and resolution to resist, to endure, and to go on. He had risked a great deal by simply staying put in Paris, even if his decision, as he later claimed, had stemmed as much from a sense of inertia as from any assertion of personal courage.

More from Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale Including Property from The Collection of Nancy Lee and Perry R. Bass

View All
View All