Philip Guston (1913-1980)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more VISIONARIES: WORKS FROM THE EMILY AND JERRY SPIEGEL COLLECTION
Philip Guston (1913-1980)

Painter at Night

Philip Guston (1913-1980)
Painter at Night
signed, titled and dated 'Philip Guston Painter At Night 1979' (on the reverse)
oil on canvas
68 x 80 in. (172.7 x 203.2 cm.)
Painted in 1979.
Estate of the artist
David McKee Inc., New York
Acquired from the above by the present owner, 1984
R. Storr, Philip Guston, New York, 1986, pp. 104-105 (illustrated in color).
T. Maloon, "'Bad' paintings the board chairman would never hang in his office,” Sydney Morning Herald, 12 November 1984.
J. Gallego, "El gusto de Guston," ABC, 02 March 1989, p. 13.
A. Ottevanger, "Philip Guston," Metropolis M, April-May 1989, p. 45.
R. Oxlade, "Father was brilliant," Modern Painters, vol. 4, no. 2, Summer 1991, p. 102 (illustrated).
H. Jacobson, Seeing with the Ear, St Albans, 1993 (illustrated in color on the cover).
Picasso, Guston, Miró, de Kooning, Painting for themselves: Late Works, exh. cat., Neues Museum Weserberg Bremen, 1996, p. 102.
XVI Bienal de São Paulo; Mexico City, Museo de Arte Moderno; Guadalajara, Centro de Arte Moderno and Bogota, Museo de Arte Moderno, Philip Guston: Sus Último An~os, October 1981-August 1982, p. 210 (São Paulo); p. 18, no. 16 (San Francisco) (illustrated in color).
Melbourne, National Gallery of Victoria; Perth, Art Gallery of Western Australia and Sydney, Art Gallery of New South Wales, Philip Guston: The Late Works, August-December 1984, pp. 20, 50 and 64, no. 35 (illustrated in color).
Madrid, Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Philip Guston: Retrospectiva de Pintura, March-May 1989, p. 142, no. 66 (illustrated in color).
Saint Louis Art Museum and Dallas Museum of Art, Philip Guston: 50 Years of Painting, September 1989-January 1990.
Special notice
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee. Where Christie's has provided a Minimum Price Guarantee it is at risk of making a loss, which can be significant, if the lot fails to sell. Christie's therefore sometimes chooses to share that risk with a third party. In such cases the third party agrees prior to the auction to place an irrevocable written bid on the lot. The third party is therefore committed to bidding on the lot and, even if there are no other bids, buying the lot at the level of the written bid unless there are any higher bids. In doing so, the third party takes on all or part of the risk of the lot not being sold. If the lot is not sold, the third party may incur a loss. The third party will be remunerated in exchange for accepting this risk based on a fixed fee if the third party is the successful bidder or on the final hammer price in the event that the third party is not the successful bidder. The third party may also bid for the lot above the written bid. Where it does so, and is the successful bidder, the fixed fee for taking on the guarantee risk may be netted against the final purchase price.

Third party guarantors are required by us to disclose to anyone they are advising their financial interest in any lots they are guaranteeing. However, for the avoidance of any doubt, if you are advised by or bidding through an agent on a lot identified as being subject to a third party guarantee you should always ask your agent to confirm whether or not he or she has a financial interest in relation to the lot.

Brought to you by

Sara Friedlander
Sara Friedlander

Lot Essay

“...I have an uneasy suspicion that painting really doesn’t have to exist at all... unless it questions itself constantly.” Philip Guston

Painted in 1979, Painter at Night is a self-portrait of the artist at the height of his career yet still challenged by the search for inspiration and the process of artistic realization. In this absorbing canvas, the artist depicts himself deep in thought, with a paintbrush in his hand, thinking pensively as if searching for artistic inspiration. The closely cropped composition is populated by objects and artists paraphernalia that are often depicted in Guston’s paintings from this period, as if to direct our attention to the single-minded focus of the artist and his pursuit of the act of creation. Rendered in a series of painterly brushstrokes, the emptiness acts as a pictorial metaphor for the frustrations of the artist’s life; days, and particularly night, spent striving for creativity only to be following by the disappointment that often comes with the physical process of realization.

Philip Guston navigated through four distinct idioms in a career that spanned half a century. Like others of his generation who came to be known as Abstract Expressionists, Guston was inspired by the muralists Gabriel Orozco, David Alfaro Siqueiros, and Diego Rivera. He produced his earliest works in this format, and was part of the New Deal / W.P.A. (Works Progress Administration) Art Project. The shift to easel painting took place in the realm of Social Realism, a logical segue from the deeply political arena of the mural. From there to abstraction was a more complicated transition, but one which earned Guston a reputation among the finest painters of that moment. Clement Greenberg identified Guston, alongside Gorky, as personifying the “romantic idea of the artist” (R. Storr, Philip Guston, Abbeville Press, 1986, p. 83).

Living a relatively isolated life in upstate New York, over the next decade Guston grew troubled by the inappropriateness of his art amidst the increasingly traumatic political climate in America. “I was feeling split, schizophrenic,” he recalled. “The war, what was happening to America, the brutality of the world, what kind of man am I, sitting at home, reading magazines, going into a frustrated fury about everything—and then going to my studio to adjust a red to blue. I wanted to be complete again, as I was when I was a kid...wanted to be whole between what I thought and what I felt...I knew that I would need to test painting all over again in order to appease my desires for the clear and sharper enigma of solid forms in an imagined space, a world of tangible things, images, subjects, stories, like the way art always was...I have an uneasy suspicion that painting really doesn’t have to exist at all... unless it questions itself constantly” (P. Guston, quoted in Philip Guston: Paintings 1969-1980, exh. cat, London, 1982. p. 50).

Radically altering course, the artist moved away from his painstakingly ordered nonobjective painting by attempting to paint, without thinking, whatever he could see. Beginning by painting all the flotsam lying around his attic, Guston soon recognized, like René Magritte, Giorgio de Chirico and Max Beckmann before him, the bizarre metaphysical power of reality and the objective world. “The more I painted,” he remarked, “The more mysterious these objects became. The visible world, I think, is abstract and mysterious enough, I don’t think one needs to depart from it in order to make art” (K. Stiles and P. Selz, eds., Philip Guston Talking. Theories and Documents of Contemporary Art, Berkeley, 1996, p. 250).

Following what he described as a “powerful desire... to paint things as if one had never seen them before, as if one had come from another planet,” Guston’s new-found obsession with the mysterious unreality of the physical world he had discovered soon developed into a profound existential awareness that started to manifest itself in his increasingly strong figurative paintings (P. Guston, op. cit, London, 1982, p.52). Guston’s new paintings began to depict the world as a sparse and often desolate, Beckett-like landscape, translating the raw ordinariness of the everyday into fascinating and troubling metaphors of the absurd. By miraculously and asserting the unnerving, and stubborn facticity of objects Guston used the realism of the ordinary and the banal as the foundation of a new art.

Rendered by Guston, in an unaffected and raw way that, materially and abstractly, employed all the painterly precision, accuracy and painstaking care that he had lavished on his earlier abstract paintings, Guston’s ordinary forms outlined a potent new vision that bridged realism and abstraction. “Where Guston’s clue images used to be masked by paint,” Thomas B. Hess wrote, “now his equally important pictorial intentions—his delight in virtuoso handling, in translucencies and viscosities—are masked by narrative” (T.B. Hess, in R. Storr, Philip Guston, New York 1986, p. 66). In Painter at Night, by placing himself between the foreground and the background, Guston becomes “trapped” in his composition and in doing so begins to question his own mortality. Painted in the last few years of his long and productive career, this painting becomes the artist’s very personal allegory of the vanity of the struggle for human artistic endeavor.

More from Post-War and Contemporary Art Evening Sale

View All
View All