Lot Essay
Pieter Claesz was, with Willem Claesz. Heda, the leading painter of still lifes in Haarlem in the first half of the 17th century. Claesz’s paintings of the 1640s tend to display an increased interest in the depiction of the smooth, reflecting surfaces of costly objects like the soaring, upright roemer in this painting. Moreover, they are frequently enlivened by luxury foodstuffs like the oysters, commonly held to be an aphrodisiac, that appear on the pewter plate at right. The theme of sexual arousal and intoxication is further underscored by the white wine in the upright roemer, the tobacco wrapped in local newsprint, and the overturned glass in the background.
While Vroom considered this and a number of other paintings bearing Claesz’s monogram to be by Franchoys Elaut (op. cit.), there is no compelling reason to doubt the traditional attribution to Claesz. Indeed, Elaut had already died in 1635, seven years before this painting was executed.
While Vroom considered this and a number of other paintings bearing Claesz’s monogram to be by Franchoys Elaut (op. cit.), there is no compelling reason to doubt the traditional attribution to Claesz. Indeed, Elaut had already died in 1635, seven years before this painting was executed.