REMBRANDT HARMENSZ. VAN RIJN (1606-1669)
REMBRANDT HARMENSZ. VAN RIJN (1606-1669)

Jan Antonides van der Linden

細節
REMBRANDT HARMENSZ. VAN RIJN (1606-1669)
Jan Antonides van der Linden
etching, drypoint and engraving
1665
on laid paper, countermark PCMB (Hinterding A.a.)
a fine, early impression of the artist's last print
the very rare third state (of seven)
printing strongly and clearly, with great contrasts and depth
with touches of burr in places, a light plate tone and selectively wiped highlights
trimmed to or just inside the platemark on three sides, lacking the lower blank border
some minor defects
generally in good condition
Sheet 126 x 103 mm.
來源
Alexander John Godby (1853-1934), Baltimore (Lugt 1119b); his sale, Sotheby's, London, 29-30 January 1935, lot 191.
With Theodore B. Donson, New York.
Sam Josefowitz (Lugt 6094); acquired from the above in 1984; then by descent to the present owners.
出版
Bartsch, Hollstein 264; Hind 268; New Hollstein 314 (this impression cited)
Stogdon p. 323

榮譽呈獻

Stefano Franceschi
Stefano Franceschi Specialist

拍品專文

This is a fine and very pleasing impression of Rembrandt's last print, created four years after he had stopped making prints in 1661 with his final valiant work the great Woman with the Arrow (B. 202; New Holl. 313). The present print shows the medical professor Jan Antonides van der Linden (1609-1664) and was intended as a frontispiece to his posthumously published version of the writings of the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates. As the story goes, Rembrandt's son Titus had bumped into the publisher and, upon hearing that an engraved portrait of van der Linden was needed, recommended his father, probably in the hope of bringing him back into business. Titus seems to have glossed over the fact that his father was an etcher, not an engraver. The commission was thus bound to fail from the beginning, as Rembrandt made the print in the way he knew and had always done, in a mixed technique of etching, engraving and drypoint. The publisher must have realised that Rembrandt's plate would not last for a large print-run, and it was never included in the book. Rembrandt however must have hoped he would, as he left a large blank margin on the plate below the portrait to be engraved with text. In the present impression, this border has been trimmed off.

The print was to be based on a painted portrait by Abraham van den Tempel (1622⁄23-1672), which may explain why the portrait does not quite look like 'a Rembrandt', although he still mastered the play of light on the garments and face as he always had - effects which can only be appreciated in early impressions, such as the present one: the face, hands and the background were etched in a very sensitive, wispy manner, which wore very quickly. The unusual placement of the professor standing in a landscape may have been a reference to his role as the founder of the botanical gardens at the university of Franeker, but also points to a burgeoning fashion in outdoor portraits.

更多來自 塞繆爾‧約瑟夫維茲珍藏:倫勃朗圖像傑作(第三部分)

查看全部
查看全部