.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
.jpg?w=1)
Lot Essay
“It is in his roses that Fantin has no equal” - Jacques-Émile Blanche
Among the titans of 19th-century still life painting, few could rival Henri Fantin-Latour's mastery of flowers. Though also accomplished in portraiture—his 1864 Homage à Delacroix, portraying himself alongside his friend Édouard Manet and other notable members of the Parisian artistic and literary circles, was presented at the Paris Salon that same year—it was in his sensitive treatment of florals that Fantin-Latour would earn his broadest acclaim. As critic Pierre Courthion declared, "not since the great Flemish masters has any artist been more capable of endowing flower painting with so much brilliance, so many shadings and so vivid a use of color than Fantin-Latour (P. Courthion, "Fantin-Latour, Painter of Flowers" in Henri Fantin-Latour, exh. cat., Acquavella Galleries, Inc., New York, 1966).
Gros bouquet de roses exemplifies the artist’s singular command of the floral still life in a delicately artful composition. Here, roses burst from their vessel in a symphony of peach, pale pink, and vivid red; some reach towards the upper bounds of the canvas while others gather below, arching over the rim of a glass vase that recedes almost entirely in the presence of the radiant flowers. A lone, wayward bloom rests on the table below, a subtle nod to the realist tendencies that distinguish the artist from earlier Romantic still life painters.
Fantin-Latour’s floral paintings had come to command widespread admiration among his contemporaries, a response eloquently captured by the painter Jacques-Émile Blanche in 1912: “The rose—so complicated in its design, contours and color, in its rolls and curls… no one understood it better than Fantin. He confers a kind of nobility on the flower… He bathes it in light and air… He captures the physiognomy of the flower he is copying; it is that particular flower and not another on the same stem: he draws and constructs the flower, and does not satisfy himself with giving an impression of it through bright, cleverly juxtaposed splashes of color” (J.-E. Blanche, Essais et Portraits, Paris, 1912, p. 45).
Such works had also been met with notable commercial success, particularly in England, where Fantin-Latour encountered a particularly strong appetite for his floral still lifes. His rose compositions were especially prized, the flower itself a longstanding national emblem that resonated strongly with English taste. Supported by the patronage of British collectors Edwin and Ruth Edwards, Fantin-Latour would gain considerable prominence across the channel, a success that soon translated into heightened recognition and success back in France. By the time he executed the present work in 1884, Fantin-Latour had firmly established himself as the foremost painter of the floral still life, realizing what the critic Zacharie Astruc had already discerned in 1863: “Delicacy of expression being the essence of his art, Fantin seems to be the visual poet of flowers” (quoted in D. Druick and M. Hoog, Fantin-Latour, exh. cat., National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa, 1983, p. 114).
Among the titans of 19th-century still life painting, few could rival Henri Fantin-Latour's mastery of flowers. Though also accomplished in portraiture—his 1864 Homage à Delacroix, portraying himself alongside his friend Édouard Manet and other notable members of the Parisian artistic and literary circles, was presented at the Paris Salon that same year—it was in his sensitive treatment of florals that Fantin-Latour would earn his broadest acclaim. As critic Pierre Courthion declared, "not since the great Flemish masters has any artist been more capable of endowing flower painting with so much brilliance, so many shadings and so vivid a use of color than Fantin-Latour (P. Courthion, "Fantin-Latour, Painter of Flowers" in Henri Fantin-Latour, exh. cat., Acquavella Galleries, Inc., New York, 1966).
Gros bouquet de roses exemplifies the artist’s singular command of the floral still life in a delicately artful composition. Here, roses burst from their vessel in a symphony of peach, pale pink, and vivid red; some reach towards the upper bounds of the canvas while others gather below, arching over the rim of a glass vase that recedes almost entirely in the presence of the radiant flowers. A lone, wayward bloom rests on the table below, a subtle nod to the realist tendencies that distinguish the artist from earlier Romantic still life painters.
Fantin-Latour’s floral paintings had come to command widespread admiration among his contemporaries, a response eloquently captured by the painter Jacques-Émile Blanche in 1912: “The rose—so complicated in its design, contours and color, in its rolls and curls… no one understood it better than Fantin. He confers a kind of nobility on the flower… He bathes it in light and air… He captures the physiognomy of the flower he is copying; it is that particular flower and not another on the same stem: he draws and constructs the flower, and does not satisfy himself with giving an impression of it through bright, cleverly juxtaposed splashes of color” (J.-E. Blanche, Essais et Portraits, Paris, 1912, p. 45).
Such works had also been met with notable commercial success, particularly in England, where Fantin-Latour encountered a particularly strong appetite for his floral still lifes. His rose compositions were especially prized, the flower itself a longstanding national emblem that resonated strongly with English taste. Supported by the patronage of British collectors Edwin and Ruth Edwards, Fantin-Latour would gain considerable prominence across the channel, a success that soon translated into heightened recognition and success back in France. By the time he executed the present work in 1884, Fantin-Latour had firmly established himself as the foremost painter of the floral still life, realizing what the critic Zacharie Astruc had already discerned in 1863: “Delicacy of expression being the essence of his art, Fantin seems to be the visual poet of flowers” (quoted in D. Druick and M. Hoog, Fantin-Latour, exh. cat., National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa, 1983, p. 114).