MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)
MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)
MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)
1 More
MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)
4 More
PROPERTY FROM A EUROPEAN PRIVATE COLLECTION
MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)

A portrait of the artist in his studio

Details
MICHIEL VAN MUSSCHER (ROTTERDAM 1645-1705 AMSTERDAM)
A portrait of the artist in his studio
signed and dated 'M. v. Musscher Pinxit . / 1670.' (lower centre, on the easel)
oil on canvas
29 ¼ x 25 in. (74.4 x 63.5 cm.)
Provenance
The artist's estate sale; Jan Pietersz Zomer, Amsterdam, 12 April 1706, lot 11, as 'a Painter in his room, very beautiful' (f 100).
Anonymous sale; Amsterdam, 21 January 1733, lot 22.
Anonymous sale; Haring v.d. Land, Amsterdam, 2 April 1734, lot 22.
H. Esser; De Ruelles, Amsterdam, 19 October 1774, lot 17.
Daniel Marsbag; Ploos van Amstel a.o., Amsterdam, 30 January 1775, lot 74 (f 20 to van der Schley), catalogued as on panel and with dimensions of 15 x 22 in.
Anonymous sale; Ploos van Amstel a.o., Amsterdam, 19 October 1778, lot 133.
Private collection, Basel, between at least 1919 and 1974.
Anonymous sale; Phillips, London, 12 August 1992, lot 39, as dated 1690.
with Noortman Master Paintings BV, Amsterdam and London, where acquired on 8 February 1993 by the father of the present owners.
Literature
(Probably) 1699 inventory of the collection of Michiel van Musscher and his second wife, as ‘Het pourtrait van den rendant in syn schilderkamer' (The portrait of the account holder in his studio), cited in A. Bredius, Künstler-Inventare, III, The Hague, 1917, pp. 987-99.
(Probably) 1705 inventory of the collection of Michiel van Musscher, cited in A. Bredius (ibid.).
H. Schneider, 'Ein Atelierbild des Michiel van Musscher', Monatshefte für Kunstwissenschaft, XII, 1919, pp. 130-1, pl. 47, fig. 1, erroneously dated 1690.
A.B. de Vries, Jan Vermeer van Delft, Basel, 1945, fig. 27.
H. van Hall, Portretten van Nederlandse Beeldende Kunstenaars: Repertorium, Amsterdam, 1963, p. 223, no. 9, erroneously dated 1690.
P.J.J. van Thiel, 'Michiel van Musscher's vroegste werk naar aanleiding van zijn portret van het echtpaar Comans', Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum, XVII, 1969, p. 32, no. 16, erroneously dated 1690.
P.J.J. van Thiel, 'Andermaal Michiel van Musscher: zijn zelfportretten', Bulletin van het Rijksmuseum, XXII, 1974, pp. 135, 139 and 144, fig. 7, erroneously dated 1690.
M. Russell, 'The Artist in his Studio: A Self-Portrait by Michiel van Musscher', Apollo, CXXVII, January 1988, pp. 11-12, fig. 3, erroneously dated 1690.
E.J. Sluijter, ‘Vermeer, Fame, and Female Beauty: The Art of Painting’, in Vermeer Studies, I. Gaskell and M. Jonker eds., New Haven and London, 1998, pp. 266-7, fig. 2, erroneously dated 1690.
A. Vergara, ed., Vermeer y el interior holandés, exhibition catalogue, Madrid, 2003, p. 91, fig. 18, as erroneously dated 1690.
W. Franits, Vermeer (Art & Ideas), London, 2015, p. 219.
Y. Hadjinicolaou, Denkende Körper - Formende Hände: Handeling in Kunst und Kunsttheorie der Rembrandtisten, Berlin, 2016, pp. 129-30, fig. 55.
A.E. Waiboer, ed., Vermeer and the Masters of Genre Painting: Inspiration and Rivalry, exhibition catalogue, New Haven and London, 2017, pp. 17 and 276, no. 57.
Y. Hadjinicolaou, Thinking Bodies - Shaping Hands: Handeling in Art and Theory of the Late Rembrandtists, Leiden and Boston, 2019, pp. 105-106, fig. 53.
Exhibited
Basel, Galerie M. Schulthess, Meisterwerke holländischer Malerei des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts im Kunstmuseum, 23 June-19 August 1945, no. 55.

Brought to you by

Maja Markovic
Maja Markovic Director, Head of Evening Sale

Lot Essay

Michiel van Musscher was the leading painter of portraits and genre scenes in Amsterdam in the late seventeenth century. The confidence he gained from this success is reflected in the self-portraits he painted, seven of which are known today, each employing a different formula and stemming from a different moment of his career. This painting is one of the earliest and arguably the most remarkable. It is clearly modelled after Johannes Vermeer’s famous allegory of The Art of Painting (fig. 1; Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum), which Musscher must have seen during a visit to Vermeer’s studio in Delft. It shows the self-assured twenty-five-year-old painter, dressed in a costly Japanese robe, seated at his easel, portraying a client. When van Musscher’s second wife died in 1699, an inventory was drawn up of the couple’s belongings, which lists among the paintings: ‘The portrait of the accountholder in his studio’ ('Het pourtrait van den rendant in syn schilderkamer'). It has been suggested that the shop sign depicting ‘the art of painting’, mentioned in 1705 in van Musscher’s estate, refers to this painting as well. After the artist died, in 1705, one of the appraisers of the 1699 inventory, the well-known dealer Jan Pietersz. Zomer, organised the sale in Amsterdam of 17 paintings from van Musscher’s possession, including ‘a Painter in his room, very beautiful’, no doubt the same work. This evidence indicates that the work remained with the artist until his death, suggesting that it held special significance for him, just as Vermeer never parted with his The Art of Painting.

The subject ultimately originates in sixteenth-century depictions of Saint Luke painting the Virgin and other similar themes featuring an artist painting a sitter from life, such as Apelles painting Campaspe. The seventeenth-century Netherlands produced a wealth of studio scenes, often with the artist painting, or showing a work to a potential buyer or connoisseur. Van Musscher would certainly have been familiar with those examples by Frans van Mieris and Gabriel Metsu, both of whom he clearly admired, judging from the many quotations from their work that can be found in his other paintings. Just like Vermeer’s allegory, van Musscher’s A Portrait of the Artist in his Studio contains allusions to the illusionistic power of painting, for instance the tapestry serving as a curtain, and to the supreme example set by the art of classical antiquity; note, for example, the inclusion of a cast of the famous Borghese Gladiator on the table beside the painter. Many of the props in this intriguing work recur in van Musscher’s later compositions, notably in his 1679 Self-portrait in the Rotterdam Museum. Widely published, this picture glorifies the art of painting and constitutes one of van Musscher’s early masterpieces.

More from Old Masters Evening Sale

View All
View All