AN EXTREMELY RARE MING CINNABAR LACQUER 'DRAGON AND PHOENIX' MIRROR BOX AND COVER

細節
明嘉靖 剔紅龍鳳紋執鏡盒 填金《大明嘉靖年製》直款

鏡盒呈扁平狀,圓首長柄。蓋面與周壁黃漆素地上雕朱漆紋飾。蓋面圓首部飾龍鳳戲珠紋,中間火珠上作一篆書「萬」字,纏枝靈芝穿插期間並延伸至柄部,柄末端雕海水江崖紋;周壁飾牽牛花、菊花、山茶、牡丹等花卉。盒裏及外底均髹紅漆,底中央刀刻填金楷書「大明嘉靖年製」直款。

此鏡盒以龍鳳、萬字、靈芝和海水江崖為紋飾,體現了嘉靖帝篤信道教的思想意識。嘉靖皇帝為禳災祛病,延年長生,不僅迷信方士,而且對各種祥瑞之物尤為喜愛,由此形成了嘉靖時期器物上的裝飾特色。

此盒被著錄於福建美術出版社出版的《中國漆器精華》第210號;《中國漆器全集‧第五卷‧明》第105號。
來源
Fritz Low Beer
出版
Zhongguo Qiqi Quanji, vol. 5, Ming, Fujian meishu chubanshe, 1995, no. 105 Zhongguo Qiqi Jinghua, Fujian meishu chubanshe, 2003, no. 210
Im Zeichen Des Drachen, Linden-Museum, Stuttgart, 2006, p. 154, no. 70
展覽
Tokugawa Art Museum and Nezu Institute of Fine Arts, 1984, Carved Lacquer, p. 132, no. 190
The Museum of East Asian Art, Cologne, 1990, Dragon and Phoenix, Chinese Lacquer Ware, The Lee Family Collection, Catalogue, no. 60
Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1990/91
The Shoto Museum of Art, Shibuya, Japan, 1991, Chinese Lacquerware, Catalogue, no. 63
2000 Years of Chinese Lacquer, Oriental Ceramic Society of Hong Kong and the Art Gallery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993, no. 65

榮譽呈獻

Carrie Li
Carrie Li

查閱狀況報告或聯絡我們查詢更多拍品資料

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

The vast majority of surviving Chinese bronze mirrors are of circular, foliate or, occasionally, square shape with a raised, pierced, boss in the centre of the back, through which a cord could be threaded. They had no handles and were normally used on specially designed mirror stands, which could rest on, or be part of dressing tables. Relatively few hand-mirrors have survived from the period prior to the Qing dynasty when mirrors with separate cylindrical or elaborate handles became the fashion. The current mirror case was designed to hold one of the earlier bronze hand-mirrors on which a flat rectangular handle was cast as part of the original mirror. A Tang dynasty bronze hand-mirror of this type is illustrated in Les Miroirs de Bronze Anciens Symbolisme & Tradition, Paris, 1989, pp. 302-3. A Song dynasty handled mirror of this type is preserved in the collection of the National Palace Museum, Taipei (illustrated in Catalogue of the Special Exhibition of Bronze Mirrors in the National Palace Museum, Taipei, 1986, pp. 236-7. pl. 143), while another dated to the period 12th-14th century and a Liao dynasty foliated example is in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (illustrated by R. Kerr in Later Chinese Bronzes, London, 1990, p. 102, no. 88, and p. 97, no. 81 right, respectively).

It is interesting to note that in the late Ming dynasty the collecting of mirrors had become fashionable, and a self-appointed arbiter of good taste Wen Zhenheng (1585-1645) in his Treatise on Superfluous Things, commended undecorated mirrors from the Qin dynasty [221-206 BC] and mercury-coloured mirrors with archaistic floral designs, but declared those with ornate inlaid decoration and hand-mirrors with handles to be vulgar (Zhang wu zhi jiaozhu revised edition with notes by Chen Zhi, Nanjing, 1984, juan 7, p. 274). Clearly his view did not deter the majority of late Ming mirror collectors.

Circular lacquer mirror cases with painted decoration have been found in Warring States and in Western Han tombs, such as that of the consort of the Marquis of Dai, where a lacquered mirror case was found in the upper compartment of a magnificent two-tiered painted lacquer toilet box (illustrated in Mawangdui yihao Han mu, vol. 1, Beijing, 1973, no. 168). However, to date, the earliest excavated and published carved lacquer mirror case with a handle is from the Song dynasty. A mirror case with a scrolling pattern carved into polychrome layered lacquer, of the type sometimes known by the Japanese term guri lacquer, was excavated from a Southern Song tomb in Wujian, Jiangsu province (illustrated in Zhongguo qiqi quanji 4 Sanguo-Yuan, Fuzhou, 1998, p. 134, no. 124).

A similar Jiajing-marked carved lacquer mirror case with rectangular handle, decorated with a design of dragons is in the collection of the Museum fur Ostasiatische Kunst, Cologne, Germany, and is illustrated in Oriental Lacquer Arts, Tokyo National Museum, 1977, no, 532.

As mentioned in the catalogue description, each dragon is missing one of the five claws from each foot. According to J. Watt and B. Ford, East Asian Lacquer; The Florence and Herbert Irving Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1991, p. 96, in the entry for no. 34, the removal of one claw from each foot of five-clawed dragons on lacquer and porcelain of the Wanli and Jiajing periods was quite common. This may have been done when a 'palace piece was given by the emperor to a member of the nobility or a senior official and thus "downgraded"'.

更多來自 千文萬華 ─ 李氏家族重要漆器珍藏(II)

查看全部
查看全部